As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: compromises

The Saver’s Dilemma

This article was written by in Banking, Saving. 27 comments.

At Consumerism Commentary, I’ve been writing about putting money into high-yield savings accounts for as long as this website has been around. Just as people started getting the message, banks pulled the rug out from under their customers. The Federal Reserve made cash easy and cheap from banks to access, and since the low federal rates were announced, there has been no incentive for banks to pay those high yields.

High yield savings and money market accounts, alternatives to the typical savings accounts offered by primarily brick-and-mortar banks, helped savers keep their money safe while beating the average rate of inflation. You could put your money in the bank and not have to worry about your cash losing value over time or losing your deposit when a bank closes, thanks to FDIC protection.

More people than ever may be saving money. The recession coincided with a “new era of thrift,” with reports in the media about the savings rate — the amount of income saved by Americans, not the interest rate — at long-time highs. This good news came at a time when the reward for doing so wasn’t much of a benefit. To spur the economy, the Federal Reserve cut the interest rate on the money it loaned to banks, and the banks in turn didn’t seek money from depositors like you and me. The low interest rates reflect the fact that banks don’t need to attract depositors when the Federal Reserve is a better source of low-cost cash.

While high-yield savings once helped savers maintain their purchasing power and liquidity at the same time, that’s not the case today. Even with a lower-than-average official rate of inflation, the real costs of living that people experience continues to rise. The money in high-yield savings accounts isn’t going to keep pace with increasing costs.

Once the public feels more confident in other investments — and it could be years before this occurs — people will take money out of savings. When money is invested in businesses, the economy will be seen as improving enough for the government to raise the federal funds rate. Banks will want to attract more depositors and savings interest rates will increase. This may be a simplified view of saving economics, but the result is what is expected: fewer people need to be saving in order for interest rates to make saving worthwhile.

It’s easy to say that keeping a portion of your wealth liquid in a saving account is a good idea even though there’s a bigger chance of losing purchasing power, and it is true. It’s becoming a more difficult argument, though, as people are tired of supposed high yields that for the most part have a maximum of 1.5% APY.

Any alternative to high-yield savings accounts are compromises, usually in the form of risk or liquidity.

  • Certificates of deposit don’t offer rates much better than savings accounts today, and when they do, they require locking your money away.
  • A common choice is investing in municipal bonds, generally considered safer, but even Vanguard is warning investors to be wary when investing in bonds. “… Yields aren’t likely to go significantly lower, and at some point when the economy does strengthen, they’re likely to push higher. When that happens, you’ll actually have principal depreciation that will at least partially, and perhaps entirely, offset some of your yield.”
  • Peer-to-peer lending is touted online as an alternative to high-yield savings accounts but that is a bad comparison. There is a significant amount of risk when you lend money to an individual who may not be fully vetted, and you don’t have access to your money until it gets paid back.

Don’t forget the benefits of savings accounts, even if the interest rate isn’t high:

  • You have almost immediate access to all of your money at any time.
  • Your deposits are fully insured up to the FDIC limit. No one has ever lost any money in a savings account, even when their bank has failed.
  • Savings accounts simplify better financial habits like automatic transfers from checking or paycheck accounts to an account not used for spending.

Saving is a dilemma because when the practice is adopted, particularly in an economic downturn when business lending and investment slows, the interest rates are lower. As the economy improves and more money is invested in businesses, interest rates are higher but fewer people are interested in leaving money in a savings account. Those who want to use a savings account regardless of the economy are subject to the interest rates defined by the whim of the economy. When interest rates are higher, people will save less money.

{ 27 comments }

President Obama’s 2011 Tax Plan

This article was written by in Taxes. 9 comments.

President Obama offered a framework for the tax-related aspects of spurring the economy moving forward. The foundation of the proposal, which conflicts with a bill that has already passed the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives, is the full extension of the Bush-era tax cuts, even for the wealthiest taxpayers.

The proposal also calls for an extension to unemployment benefits for another thirteen months and a consolation to Republicans who wanted more favorable tax treatment for estates.

None of this proposal is automatic. Congress must still form bills based on this proposal, pass the bills through a vote, and send a compromise bill to the president to sign. All along the way, there will be more compromises. The new laws affect taxes for 2011 income, so there is enough time for more partisan debate to shape a bipartisan law before taxpayers will owe their final tax bill for the year in April 2012 (or October with an extension).

For those who need to plan for 2011 taxes ahead of time, particularly small business owners, it would be better to know the results as soon as possible.

Is Obama conceding to Republican pressure too early or is this plan the right move to boost the economy?

{ 9 comments }

When a couple marries or otherwise commits to be in a long-term relationship with each other, the question of whether to combine money usually arises. The debate about whether what could be called “his money” and “her money” should become “our money” is endless. Different arrangements work for different couples, and this article doesn’t address that question.

Those couples who do decide to combine finances often stop at the minimum. They might create a joint checking account for shared expenses like rent or mortgage payments but don’t make an effort to take co-ownership of the complete financial picture. I have not been in a situation that warranted a combination of finances, but I’ve given the issue some thought.

1. Agree on life goals. This isn’t necessarily a pure financial concept, but your money depends on what you want to do with your life. Being wealthy is not a goal because money is nothing but a tool to help you achieve accomplishments that are important to you.

It may be safe to assume that a successful relationship stems from agreement on world views and major life goals, but work out the details. For example, what will retirement look like? What is the philosophy about philanthropy? Will you leave an inheritance? Opening the communication about these larger issues, and finding compromises if necessary, enables a better decision-making process.

2. Combine basic spending and savings accounts. As mentioned above, this is usually the first and last step couples take. This is easy: open a joint checking account at your favorite bank. Even the question of whether each individual in the couple contributes the same dollar amount, the same percentage of income, or some combination, is one of the easiest questions you’ll have to consider when combining finances.

This step is easiest when each side of the couple produces roughly the same amount of income for the same amount of work. Perhaps a better way of looking at this question is considering how much each individual should keep for his or herself, making the shared account the default.

3. View investment portfolios as a whole. More difficult than an income disparity is a risk tolerance disparity. There could exist a couple wherein one individual is comfortable putting most of the family’s long-term wealth in the stock market for a better chance of growth over that period while the other would prefer the funds to be safe and less volatile. This couple will have a more difficult time finding a compromised solution.

My company offers tools to manage the risk of my 401(k) investments, but the facility of tools like these are limited. If my 401(k) was my sole investment, this automated questionnaire-based tool would be sufficient, but it takes neither my other investment accounts nor a theoretical spouse’s investments. Rather than relying on these tools, a couple should manage their risk in total and make sure they asset allocation and diversification is in line with goals and needs.

4. Work together to pay off debt. Like merged assets such as bank accounts, a committed relationship also turns “his debt” and “her debt” into “our debt.” It’s in the couple’s interest to pay off debt as quickly as possible. This can certainly not seem fair, particularly if one side of the couple worked diligently to pay off debt while the other slacked.

As long as trust, honesty, and open communication are a part of the relationship, there should be no surprises.

5. Everyone is involved. I’ve seen couples where one person handles the finances and the other prefers to have nothing to do with the details surrounding money. I understand that not everyone has an interest in personal finance, as much as I wouldn’t like to believe it because fewer people interested means fewer people reading Consumerism Commentary, and so I accept that not everyone wants to deal with the bits, bytes, cents and dollars. Each couple needs only one person in Quicken or Mint tracking finances with that level of detail. Perhaps some of the bill-paying duties, however, should be shared.

A business partnership is different than a life-long committed relationship. In a business, perhaps only one person handles the finances. In a couple, taking care of money is like taking care of children. Both will grow and develop best when everyone is involved.

How have you succeeded in combining your finances — and your life? If you have decided to keep your money separate, why was this the right choice for you? For everyone, combined or not, what obstacles have you encountered?

{ 10 comments }

The unemployment rate for young workers between the ages of 16 and 23 is 18%, and that is an increase of five points from a year ago. That age group includes high school drop-outs as well as college graduates, and for these people the future looks bleak. Adults are taking the minimum-wage jobs teenagers might be offered in other economic situations. Older workers, otherwise approaching retirement, are not leaving the workforce as quickly. The openings for younger workers aren’t there.

The bad news is starting your career in a recession is one of the worst things you can do for your long-term financial security. More bad news is that there is little any one person can do about the economy at large. Here are the numbers, from a study at Yale quoted in the cover story in today’s BusinessWeek:

For each percentage-point rise in the unemployment rate, those who graduated during the recession earned 6% to 7% less in their first year of employment than their more fortunate counterparts. Even 15 years out of school, the recession graduates earned 2.5% less than those who began working in more prosperous times.

Young adults might be destined to be a “lost generation.” Here are some suggestions for 16-to-23-year-olds who find themselves having a difficult time starting their career in this recession and want to mitigate its effects on long-term income.

1. Finish your education

It’s an issue of supply and demand. First, if you have not done so, completing your Bachelor’s degree will have two important effects. First, it will improve your marketability among entry-level employees when fewer open positions will create a competitiveness that ensures that the best qualified candidates will win. A Bachelor’s degree is a gateway to at least the middle class, and that’s going to be more important than ever.

Second, finishing college now will keep you out of the worst of the recession. This will allow you to stay out of the worst fight for jobs, but it has some drawbacks. Delaying the start of full-time income can also have detrimental effects on your long-term income — but if you wouldn’t be working anyway, this isn’t much of a disadvantage. Also, if you are relying on student loans, you will be amassing more debt that will require payoff down the road, perhaps shacking you to a job or career that is not best for you. New student loans have higher interest rates than they have in the past, adding to the pain of debt.

If you have your Bachelor’s degree, consider spending a few years to earn your Master’s or Doctorate degree. Are you worried about being overqualified? Don’t be. As we’re seeing in the recession where many workers are competing for few jobs, anything that helps you stand above the rest will be an advantage rather than a disadvantage. You might want to consider adapting your desired career to one better suited for an advanced degree, however.

2. Become an apprentice

In general, apprentices earn more throughout their careers than those who don’t hone their skills in a formal training program. Traditionally, apprenticeships are common for certain crafts and trades. Electricians, plumbers, and carpenters often get their starts through apprenticeship and there is significant income potential in these fields.

One creative answer is to become an apprentice for a career that does not traditionally fit this profile. For example, if you have musical talent and would normally consider performing or teaching in a better economy, consider composing music for films or television. You can contact a professional currently in the field and contact them about becoming an apprentice. One key to successfully finding an apprenticeship is the willingness and the ability to work for free.

3. Start your own business

I’m not talking about selling your possessions on eBay, but padding your savings account with cash rather than padding your home with useless objects is never a bad idea. Everyone has at least one marketable skill. It may require some time brainstorming to determine exactly how you can turn your skills into a service you can offer people or other businesses.

A recession is perfect timing to start a business, particularly if you can dedicate all your time to making it work (that is, you are otherwise unemployed). Many new businesses suffer because the owner needs to devote his or her time to the day job, a spouse, and perhaps even children. For young workers, the time will likely never be better for starting a business with the ability of giving it your full attention.

4. Save money

As a recent graduate or drop-out, you may have the option to move back in with your parents for a short time. After all, there is a recession and being able to save money on rent or a house payment is worth the temporary shame you might feel for going home with your tail between your legs. This is most likely the biggest opportunity for savings, but you don’t want to take advantage of the situation. Show your parents that you’re working hard to make the recession work for you, and they’re more likely to give you a break. And don’t forget to express gratitude.

Consider frugality as a way of life. In an economy where you have less control over your income thanks to fewer employment options, you can still control your expenses to a point. Take the extra time to determine what you are willing to cut back in order to help your money go farther. Occasionally, generic brands and store brands are good compromises.

Creativity leads to success

Surviving in a recession where it’s difficult to find a job relies on creative thinking. Use the opportunity to rethink your career path. If the acquisition of money has been your ultimate goal, realize that money by itself is not a goal. You may use the opportunity to break into a less popular field with a lower income potential but with a greater satisfaction potential.

Accept that the odds are against you if you want to compare yourself and your bank account against people who began their careers in the height of the economy, people who, on average, will out-earn those entering the workforce right now.

Photo credits: CarbonNYC, roland
The Lost Generation, Peter Coy, BusinessWeek, October 8, 2009

{ 12 comments }

Friday Discussion: The Need for and Cost of Health Care Reform

by Flexo

I visit a doctor once a year at the most, and I hardly require prescription medicine. The cost of my health insurance premium is about $800 this year for my HMO plan. My employer pays a larger percentage of the total premium, but the prices increase each year by a percentage much higher than inflation. ... Continue reading this article…

26 comments Read the full article →

The $700 Bailout Bill Proposed By the Senate is Not Good Enough

by Flexo

In the original version of this article, I was under the impression that the Senate had passed this bill already. It hasn’t; they have only just released the details to the public. A vote will come later. Over the weekend as I watched the Mets end a frustrating season with a disappointing final series, the ... Continue reading this article…

15 comments Read the full article →

McCain vs. Obama: Your Future Tax Bill

by Flexo

The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center released a report yesterday that explains in detail the effect that a McCain presidency and an Obama presidency would have on the tax bill for American households. The data are stratified by income range and reflect a wide difference in stated policy between the two candidates. In addition to making ... Continue reading this article…

34 comments Read the full article →

Jonathan Clements Exits: The Essence of Money

by Flexo

Jonathan Clements, a columnist for the Wall Street Journal, is leaving journalism. He published his last article on Wednesday, a reflection on fourteen years at the Journal and 26 years writing professionally about money. In the article, he looks at the essence of saving and investing. Why bother? A number of visitors touched on these ... Continue reading this article…

10 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 212