Search: deductions

TurboTax 2012 Online Review

This article was written by Flexo in Reviews, Software, Taxes. 62 comments.

This is a relatively long review of TurboTax 2012 Online, software for completing tax forms and submitting them to both the federal and state authorities. I’ve updated the review to reflect the changes to the software in 2012 (for filing 2011 tax returns).

Recently, the IRS began accepting federal tax returned filed electronically. Even before the IRS began accepting returns, you could still have completed your tax forms online through software. Programs like TurboTax, H&R Block, and Jackson Hewitt have been accepting customers and holding off on filing until now. This delay affected those who had itemized deductions, claimed the tuition and fees deduction, or claimed the sales tax deduction.

Many taxpayers are just getting started with their 2011 federal returns now. I’ve been using the services of an accountant for the past few years, and he was able to cut through the more confusing tax consequences of owning a business, saving me $15,000. Before my tax situation was complicated, however, I completed my taxes online using various software. Following a series of questions, completing and filing my 1040 form was easy.

Every year, the companies that provide tax e-filing services like TurboTax and H&R Block tweak their products, not only for the latest tax laws, but to improve features, making the process of tax filing easier. I took a look at TurboTax to see what changes the newest edition has to offer.

The first thing I noticed with TurboTax is the wide variety of products they have available. There is an option that is completely free for filing federal returns, but it is limited. This free version is for taxpayers whose returns can be completed using the 1040-EZ form, a simplified version of the 1040 form. If you have deductions, investments, a mortgage, or self-employment income, or if you want a step-by-step hand-holding guide to completing the forms, you will not be able to take advantage of the TurboTax Free Edition.

TurboTax offers several flavors in addition to the Free Edition, including Deluxe, Premier, Home & Business, and Business, each to handling more complicated tax situations above and beyond the lighter editions. The Deluxe Edition focuses on capturing all of your deductions. The Premier Edition does deductions, as well, but also includes the forms you need for investments like stocks, mutual funds, and rental properties. Home & Business covers all of the above as well as self-employment income, and the Business Edition is for anyone who is a partner in or owner of a corporation.

The editions are flexible; start with the Deluxe Edition, and as you come across features you need, TurboTax will ask if you’d like to upgrade — without charging you yet — to the edition that takes all of your needs into account. I started the Deluxe Edition to see how far I could go. I saw that for the most part none of the upgrades are needed if you are confident about your tax accounting abilities and are willing to enter your information directly into forms rather than have the software hold your hand through every decision.

Get your refund in as little as 8 days. E-file with TurboTax today. It’s Easy

Here is an overview of my entire process of completing my federal and state tax returns with TurboTax.

Read the full article →

{ 62 comments }

Fix the Tax System By Taxing Consumption

This article was written by Flexo in Taxes. 16 comments.

An elegant answer to the over-complicated tax system is to shift the basis of the system from income to spending. There have been a variety of proposals to make this happen. It’s the core of the so-called Fair Tax and Herman Cain incorporated its concept into his 9-9-9 tax plan. Other proposals have called for a value-added tax similar to the system in the United Kingdom.

Ferrari Working to earn a living contributes to society, as does investing in businesses. Taxes on income, whether wages or dividends, could discourage this type of economically-beneficial activity. Consumer spending also benefits the economy, though, and if this tax system discourages spending, it might have a negative effect on the economy initially.

Also, lower-income households and those who live paycheck-to-paycheck would bear a higher burden. When almost all of a family’s income is spent, this family would be taxed on a high percentage of their income. On the other hand, a corporate executive earning more than a million dollars does not need to spend all of his money. His tax burden is more affordable. Under today’s tax environment, someone with the means might put money into real estate, invest in businesses, and shelter assets in offshore accounts. Under the new system, a wealthy individual might stay away from buying houses if those transactions are taxed, while bringing more offshore assets back to the United States.

Rather than adding a national sales tax to determine consumption, one solution is to report all income, as is currently done, as well as all contributions to savings, just like what is done for IRA and 401(k) accounts. The difference between income and savings would be the basis on which the government levies the consumption tax. There could be a high standard deduction applied to the difference, so that lower-income families who are struggling to save do not need to pay an unaffordable tax bill, and so that the system remains progressive.

Reforming the tax system away from income tax is a tall order. Thanks to deductions for tax-advantaged savings, the income tax system has already begun to shift towards a focus on spending, but if you believe that the system could be vastly improved by focusing solely on consumption, the system has a long way to go before workers and savers aren’t punished by a tax collection system.

Would you prefer a tax system based solely on consumption?

Photo: exfordy
New York Times, Slate

{ 16 comments }

Podcast 143: Tax Law Changes in 2012

This article was written by Flexo in Podcast. 3 comments.

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Bryan J Busch talks to Kathy Pickering, Executive Director of H&R Block’s Tax Institute.

They discuss the difference between smart investments vs. emotional decisions, the importance of financial planning, and how most people are better off just buying an index fund and ignoring investment gurus.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast
Tax Law Changes in 2012: S06E13 / 169

Download – RSS – iTunes

[00:00] Introduction from Bryan J Busch
[00:34] Interview with Kathy Pickering
– [00:48] Do an annual review of life changes
– [01:26] Extending the Payroll Tax Holiday
– [02:43] Federally declared disasters and casualty losses
– [04:39] Energy efficiency credit (check the list at energystar.gov)
– [05:51] American Opportunity Credit for college students, tuition and fees deductions, and the Lifetime Learning Credit
– [08:16] Tax credits for adoption
– [11:10] Credit for some plug-in cars
– [12:10] Brokers are now required to report cost basis of the sale of stocks and securities
– [12:59] Health care reform affects on individual and small business taxes
– [17:59] Expired hiring credits
– [18:55] Changes to be aware of for 2013
– [21:31] E-filing is heavily encouraged and improved
[23:56] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

Theme music by Mindcube.

{ 3 comments }

Home Mortgage Interest Deduction

This article was written by Flexo in Featured, Real Estate and Home, Taxes. 60 comments.

Although the home mortgage interest deduction is one of the most oft-cited benefits of owning a home, most taxpayers don’t take advantage of it because it requires itemizing taxes. If itemized deductions including mortgage interest paid throughout the year exceed the standard deduction, a taxpayer can take advantage of the benefit.

The benefit isn’t as great as it sounds. If you pay interest, it certainly does help to get a tax benefit, but it rarely tips the balance of the long-term financial effects of renting vs. buying a house. Don’t let the real estate industry sway your opinion about owning a house through this faulty rationale. And certainly don’t decide to take out a mortgage if you were intending to buy with cash. Since this is a deduction, your taxes are reduced by only a percentage of the interest you pay, related to your tax bracket.

The home mortgage interest deduction is currently endangered. The Obama administration and Congress are looking for ways to cut spending, and this tax deduction is on the table for consideration. Some estimated put the cost of this deduction at $100 billion each year.

Despite the cost and its overstated effects, the tax deduction has helped convince renters to become homeowners — at least among people I have spoken with. In other words, for the cost of $100 billion, the economy has seen the benefit of a growing real estate market for many years. This law has made the National Association of Realtors, a lobbying group for the real estate industry, very happy, and they are working hard to prevent the government from eliminating the tax deduction.

There are many rules that determine whether you can claim the interest you pay on your mortgage for a tax deduction. The rules help ensure that the benefit goes to home owners rather than “investors” who earn a living from flipping houses, though due to market conditions the past few years, that activity has been less of an issue.

The interest you pay for construction, purchasing or improving your primary or secondary home, whether through a mortgage, home equity loan, or home equity line of credit, qualifies. There are limitations, though. You can deduct interest paid on up to only $1,000,000 of home acquisition debt. For home equity debt, which is any loan that was taken not to construct, purchase, or improve a house, you can deduct interest paid on up to only $500,000 of this debt or the fair market value of the home, whichever is less. For taxpayers who are married, filing separately, each of these limits is reduced by half.

Normally, the total of all of your itemized deductions are limited by income, but that income limitation was lifted in 2010. It could be lifted again if the benefit is not eliminated.

Question for homeowners: Do you take the home mortgage interest deduction? Question for everyone: Should this deduction be eliminated for the sake of reducing the national budget deficit?

Photo: Wonderlane

{ 60 comments }

Year End Reminder: Change Your 401(k) Contribution Level Now

by Flexo

At the end of the year, most people in the United States are thinking about the holidays and the potential credit card bills for gifts and family visits. One good way to control this potentially stressful month is to take some time to breathe and get your own finances in order. There are several actions ... Continue reading this article…

16 comments Read the full article →

Tax Deduction for Time Spent Volunteering

by Flexo

I recently received reader feedback from a conscious saver who is planning to move his money from Wells Fargo to a credit union. She won’t make the Bank Transfer Day November 5 goal, because the credit union’s branch is planned to open November 7. This reader plans to be one of the new branch’s first ... Continue reading this article…

4 comments Read the full article →

2012 Federal Income Tax Brackets and Marginal Rates

by Flexo

The IRS has finalized the 2012 federal income tax brackets, but most people aren’t concerned with these numbers until next year. In April 2012, you’ll need to be concerned with the 2011 tax brackets to file your 2011 income tax returns. Most taxpayers won’t need to deal with the 2012 rates until early 2013. While ... Continue reading this article…

15 comments Read the full article →

The Buffett Rule: Tax for Millionaires

by Flexo

As a continuation of President Obama’s jobs proposal (economic stimulus) for curbing spending and increasing federal government revenue, the administration is taking a cue from famous investor, Warren Buffett. On many occasions, Buffett has claimed that wealthy Americans do not pay a fair share of the tax burden relative to their means to do so. ... Continue reading this article…

38 comments Read the full article →