As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: dvr


Set-top boxes continuously run in homes who have them. Cable boxes, satellite boxes, and digital video recorders (DVRs) are designed to constantly remain on, even while no one in the household is home. According to the National Resources Defense Council, these devices cost $3 billion to run every year, and $2 billion of that cost is incurred while the boxes are not being used.

Part of the problem is the design of the boxes. Television providers want the ability to communicate with the boxes at any time, for example, to send software upgrades late at night when fewer people are watching television, and so they don’t encourage consumers to turn the boxes off. The boxes are also designed to take a long time to reboot and download programming guides, so powering down the boxes frequently could be a nuisance for customers who don’t want to wait before being able to tune into their favorite shows. Furthermore, for those with DVRs, shutting off the boxes might result in a missed recording.

Turning off the cable boxes — many households have more than one — is an easy way to reduce the power bill. The issue isn’t just affording to pay the bills, however.

In 2010, set-top boxes in the United States consumed approximately 27 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, which is equivalent to the annual output of nine average (500 MW) coal-fired power plants. The electricity required to operate all U.S. boxes is equal to the annual household electricity consumption of the entire state of Maryland, results in 16 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions…

The average new cable high-definition digital video recorder (HD-DVR) consumes more than half the energy of an average new refrigerator and more than an average new flat-panel television. Even more troubling, when not displaying or recording video content, U.S. boxes draw nearly as much power as they do when in use.

The NRDC offers suggestions for manufacturers and television providers to improve energy consumption, but it could be worthwhile for consumers to get in the habit of removing the cable box from the power source on a regular basis. Turning the power off often just results in turning the clock display off with the device remaining on to communicate with the cable or satellite company and for programming to be available immediately when the box is turned on. Unplugging or shutting off power (via a wall switch) is the best way to ensure the box is not consuming any power.

For those who use the DVR to record programs while they are away — and DVRs consumer 40% more energy than boxes without recording technology — there are more ways to view programs you missed. Many content providers offer a wider selection of shows to be viewed at a later time (like Comcast’s “On Demand”), and networks offer full episodes to be streamed from network websites.

Photo: meddygarnet
National Resources Defense Council [pdf]

{ 24 comments }

Among the more popular reasons for not ditching cable is the desire to watch live sports. ESPN is coming to the rescue of many future cable-less households by introducing live, streaming sports in HD through the Xbox.

In order to benefit, you’ll need to be an Xbox Live Gold member, which is about $50 a year, and also brings you benefits like Netflix streaming (with a separate but cheap Netflix membership). You’ll also need to be a subscriber to a limited (albeit lengthy) list of broadband providers. Big players like Cox, Comcast, Verizon and AT&T are on the list, though AT&T comes with the warning that the service is for DSL and Uverse customers only.

As for the content itself, CNET reports:

The ESPN service will offer 3,500 live events in addition to on-demand content from college football and basketball, MLB, NBA, and soccer games; though there was no direct mention of the NFL and NHL. These streaming games will also offer some DVR functionality too…

You can also sometimes find certain sporting events, like the World Cup, available streaming through services like Boxee, but you can’t always rely on that happening. It’s good to see an established, big-budgeted institution like ESPN making their content available to “broadband-only” households.

NCNET News

{ 7 comments }

HDMI Cables Are Cheap

This article was written by in Consumer. 30 comments.

On Tuesday, I asked our readers to answer a few questions about their household TV situation, and I found that 49% of respondents don’t use a DVR. I was surprised to learn that, but it says more about me than you guys: I’ve let myself get sucked inside an on-demand, time-shifting echo chamber of bleeding-edge TV watching. My house, in other words, is not normal.

What that means, though, is that there’s still plenty of time to share the things I’ve learned so that you can benefit in the future.

I learned that HDMI cables are cheap

Or at least, they should be.

When you’re in the electronics store getting the equipment to upgrade your entertainment center, you’ll be under pressure from without and within to get everything all at once. Furniture, batteries, universal remote, cables, etc. The problem is that there persists an antiquated idea that you’ll want expensive cables. If your new setup is all digital, this is simply not true. Digital signals either work perfectly, or not at all.

This comic strip reminder from the Mint.com blog summarizes the problem well:

Screen shot 2010-04-02 at 7.21.46 AM

In my quest for the perfect, cheap, digital entertainment center that spanned two years, I ordered more than a few HDMI cables of all sizes, and I can vouch that you should buy the cheapest ones you can find. I’ve had good luck with both MonoPrice and Amazon.com.

Good hunting.

{ 30 comments }

That’s a line from one of my favorites movies, Back to the Future, during the scene where Marty McFly almost has dinner with his mother and grandparents. If there ever was a commentary on consumerism, this is near the top of my list:

Lorraine Baines: Our first television. Dad just picked it up today. Do you have a television?

Marty: Well, yeah, you know, we have… two of ‘em.

Milton: Wow! You must be rich!

The joke, of course, is that thirty years in Marty’s past, it’d be ridiculous to think that people could afford two televisions. And I think it was about a year after the movie came out that my sister and I both got a black-and-white set for Christmas. (That TV was cool, not just because it was mine, but because if I plugged in the Nintendo and set it to Channel 2, the TV became a police scanner. I am not making this up.) Having a TV in my room set me free from watching whatever my parents and sister wanted to watch. As the youngest, I finally had a little bit of power.

Now in 2010 and at age 34, I have all the power in the world, at least as far as TV is concerned. We hooked up a Mac Mini to a projector ($900 used), and we blast the image onto a $75 screen. We can watch anything online, anything in the iTunes store, anything on Netflix, etc. etc.

But I think I take it for granted that with the prevalence of DVRs and high bandwidth, each of us can watch whatever we want, whenever we want. I know objectively that’s not the case. Not everybody will elect for super-high bandwidth, or even a DVR from the cable company. Those things cost extra, and some people will undoubtedly find them to cost more than they’re worth.

That’s to say nothing of the fact that using a projector in your home is rare. People are much more likely to spring for one flat-panel TV in the main viewing area. But that begs the question: what do the kids use in their rooms? I’m especially curious to find out if they forgo traditional TVs entirely and just watch stuff on their computers.

So, if you wouldn’t mind helping me escape from the echo chamber of cutting-edge entertainment technology, could you help me with a little survey? Especially if you have kids in the house, I’d like to know the following:

If you do not see a survey above, click here.

{ 17 comments }

Smithee Debt Update, February 13, 2010

by Smithee

This was a pretty good week for saving money. Last weekend, I took my strict $100 out of the bank for the next seven days, but I also ordered a small-ish present for my wife, which cost about $50. As a result, I set myself a challenge to see if I could spend $50 or ... Continue reading this article…

9 comments Read the full article →

Life Without Cable TV: Week One

by Smithee

(No, I don’t plan on writing about this on a regular basis, just when an interesting milestone occurs.) It’s been a full week since my family turned off the TV service and to summarize: we’re doing fine. As expected, I’m discovering some of the “known unknowns” of being a person without cable but who still ... Continue reading this article…

19 comments Read the full article →

No More Cable TV For Me

by Smithee

Well, we went and did it. As of today, the Verizon FiOS TV service we’d been mostly enjoying for almost three years is suspended. We’re not replacing it with cable or satellite television, either. The normal TV service is effectively turned off. I’m scared and nervous and excited all at once. It’s been nearly seven ... Continue reading this article…

23 comments Read the full article →

Alternate Ways of Rewarding Content Creators

by Smithee

I’ve been thinking a lot since the last time we talked about my ongoing internal troubles with stealing entertainment. In general, my habits are tending more toward avoiding theft, even accidentally. I want to make sure that the creators know that the thing they made was good, and I want to help them make more. ... Continue reading this article…

2 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 212