As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: emissions


Set-top boxes continuously run in homes who have them. Cable boxes, satellite boxes, and digital video recorders (DVRs) are designed to constantly remain on, even while no one in the household is home. According to the National Resources Defense Council, these devices cost $3 billion to run every year, and $2 billion of that cost is incurred while the boxes are not being used.

Part of the problem is the design of the boxes. Television providers want the ability to communicate with the boxes at any time, for example, to send software upgrades late at night when fewer people are watching television, and so they don’t encourage consumers to turn the boxes off. The boxes are also designed to take a long time to reboot and download programming guides, so powering down the boxes frequently could be a nuisance for customers who don’t want to wait before being able to tune into their favorite shows. Furthermore, for those with DVRs, shutting off the boxes might result in a missed recording.

Turning off the cable boxes — many households have more than one — is an easy way to reduce the power bill. The issue isn’t just affording to pay the bills, however.

In 2010, set-top boxes in the United States consumed approximately 27 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity, which is equivalent to the annual output of nine average (500 MW) coal-fired power plants. The electricity required to operate all U.S. boxes is equal to the annual household electricity consumption of the entire state of Maryland, results in 16 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions…

The average new cable high-definition digital video recorder (HD-DVR) consumes more than half the energy of an average new refrigerator and more than an average new flat-panel television. Even more troubling, when not displaying or recording video content, U.S. boxes draw nearly as much power as they do when in use.

The NRDC offers suggestions for manufacturers and television providers to improve energy consumption, but it could be worthwhile for consumers to get in the habit of removing the cable box from the power source on a regular basis. Turning the power off often just results in turning the clock display off with the device remaining on to communicate with the cable or satellite company and for programming to be available immediately when the box is turned on. Unplugging or shutting off power (via a wall switch) is the best way to ensure the box is not consuming any power.

For those who use the DVR to record programs while they are away — and DVRs consumer 40% more energy than boxes without recording technology — there are more ways to view programs you missed. Many content providers offer a wider selection of shows to be viewed at a later time (like Comcast’s “On Demand”), and networks offer full episodes to be streamed from network websites.

Photo: meddygarnet
National Resources Defense Council [pdf]

{ 24 comments }

As gas prices increase, you can save some money by buying a more environmentally friendly vehicles. That may only be true when evaluating the cost of gas over time, however. Hybrid and other cars that rely on energy sources other than gasoline may cost more to own over the long-term when you consider the initial price of the car and the cost of maintenance.

Eventually, it is quite possible that green cars will be less costly to own than gasoline-based cars, but that time is not here yet. While you can certainly save money in the cost of gas over time when compared to a comparable car, money is a poor reason for choosing to buy green.

So why buy green at all? If you believe that it is important to do less damage to the environment, you may be willing to pay a little extra in order to achieve that goal. Just buying a more fuel-efficient vehicle is only part of the answer; in fact, many people will point out that in some cases buying green, due to the manufacturing process, can be more damaging overall.

However, as more people become interested in green technology, it will become more affordable for businesses to research, develop and improve this technology. Eventually, with enough momentum, green technology will be more affordable and more effective.

Kelley Blue Book has announced their choices for the top ten green cars of 2010. Here is how the editors explain their methodology:

While it would have been simple just to have ticked off the Top 10 vehicles in fuel efficiency and let it go at that, we again sought out a variety of vehicle types because not everyone who wants to get greener will have their transportation needs met by a small sedan. To be considered for the green Top 10, each vehicle was required to offer fuel economy and CO2 emissions superior to the bulk of vehicles in its class and at the same time provide all the safety, creature comforts and driving enjoyment that would make it pleasant to own.

Here is the list:

  1. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid: 22 mpg (21 city, 22 highway)
  2. 2010 Toyota Highlander Hybrid: 26 mpg (27 city, 25 highway)
  3. 2010 BMW 335d: 27 mpg (23 city, 36 highway)
  4. 2010 Honda Fit: 31 mpg (28 city, 35 highway)
  5. 2010 Ford Escape Hybrid: 32 mpg (34 city, 31 highway)
  6. 2010 MINI Cooper: 32 mpg (28 city, 37 highway)
  7. 2010 Volkswagen Golf TDI: 34 mpg (30 city, 42 highway)
  8. 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid: 39 mpg (41 city, 36 highway)
  9. 2010 Honda Insight: 41 mpg (40 city, 43 highway)
  10. 2010 Toyota Prius: 50 mpg (51 city, 48 highway)

My 2004 Honda Civic LX, not a hybrid model, is approaching 120,000 miles, so I still have several years before I’ll need to replace it. When you replace your current car, what will you purchase?

{ 11 comments }

The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) recently released an updated list of the twelve greenest cars of 2010. The council rates each car with a score, with higher scores going to those cars produce less pollution and are more fuel efficient, resulting in lower energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions.

Here are the top twelve greenest cars of 2010.

  1. Honda Civic GX automatic transmission, compressed natural gas
  2. Toyota Prius automatic transmission
  3. Honda Civic Hybrid automatic transmission
  4. Smart Fortwo Convertible/Coupe manual transmission
  5. Honda Insight manual transmission
  6. Ford Fusion Hybrid / Mercury Milan Hybrid automatic transmission
  7. Toyota Yaris manual transmission
  8. Nissan Altima Hybrid automatic transmission
  9. Mini Cooper manual transmission
  10. Chevrolet Cobalt XFE / Pontiac G5 XFE manual transmission
  11. Hyundai Accent Blue manual transmission
  12. Honda Fit automatic transmission

When shopping for a car, do you consider your effect to the environment? Most personal finance advice will guide someone to the best car for the available money or the car that is the least expensive to own. New, cleaner technology is often more expensive. Is being green a “luxury?”

American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, January 19, 2010
Photo credit: Daquella manera

{ 17 comments }

Last week I mentioned France would be seeing a new but insignificant tax on carbon emissions and considered the possibilities, including possible reactions, if a similar tax was initiated here in the United States. Both political sides are criticizing this tax and it’s not expected to be effective in terms of its goal of encouraging non-carbon-based fuels.

Meanwhile, the United Kingdom has approved a new tax that will likely be more effective at its goal: raising money for the government. Banks who have employees in the U.K. will pay a one-time tax for every employee who earns a bonus over £25,000 (about $40,000). The company, not the employee, would be required to pay 50% of the amount of the bonus that exceeds £25,000.

In the United States, despite high unemployment and a public that is not very enthused about Wall Street bankers slated to receive some of the biggest bonuses ever distributed, it’s unlikely that such a massive tax would be approved by the government. For the sake of the economy, politicians generally stay on the side of big business. It is apparent that companies want to keep their top talent and are willing to move mountains to ensure they can pay their star employees whatever the market demands.

With the United Kingdom, it’s likely we’ll see companies pay the tax and maintain their level of bonuses. I expect the same thing would happen on this side of the Atlantic; with banks making money once again, they would be willing to take the tax expense and the reduction of shareholder value if it means keeping the talent they want to keep.

Do you think the United States would see a bonus tax rate of 50%, even if it is just a one-time event?

Photo credit: damo1977

{ 9 comments }

France Introduces Carbon Tax of $25 Per Metric Ton

by Flexo

President Nicolas Sarcozy of France revealed his plans for working to reduce his country’s carbon dioxide emissions. For each taxpayer’s metric ton of carbon dioxide emission due to use of oil, gas, or coal, the government will charge that taxpayer a fee of €17 (roughly $25). This rate would rise over time. Other energy use, ... Continue reading this article…

10 comments Read the full article →

Is it Time to Add a Significant National Gas Tax?

by Flexo

Consumerism Commentary readers: Please complete this readership survey for a chance to win a $50 Amazon.com gift card! At the pump, gas prices are “low” now. Remember last May when Chrysler was offering a $2.99 gas guarantee while the price per gallon continued to climb towards $4.00? It seemed like a good deal at the ... Continue reading this article…

24 comments Read the full article →

My Electric Bill: Why I Pay More

by Sasha

I asked a few weeks back whether any of you had changed your spending behaviors based on our current recession. Some of you had cut back, while others underscored the importance of always living frugally, so no recession-time cutbacks are necessary. I, too, choose to live frugally. But sometimes, I also choose to pay more. ... Continue reading this article…

15 comments Read the full article →

Festival of Frugality #119: The Quitting My Day Job to Blog Full Time Edition

by Flexo

This morning I have the honor of hosting the 119th edition of the Festival of Frugality! I’d like to lead off with an announcement: I gave my notice yesterday. As of April 12th, I will be a full-time blogger. After months of deliberation, I have decided to take Consumerism Commentary to the next level, and ... Continue reading this article…

40 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 212