As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: federal-reserve

July 1 and August 15 are the dates consumers need to worry about. New Fed rules for bank accounts go into effect on July 1 for anyone who opens a new bank account, while current account holders should know about changes to their accounts starting August 15.

On these dates, the Federal Reserve is limiting the ability for banks to collect fees from their customers through overdraft fees, a popular income source for banks and an unpopular nuisance for account holders. In the old system, the cost of offering free products was subsidized by the small percentage of customers paying overdraft fees.

Will I do believe it is good that overdraft fees, a penalty that targets whether by design or by practice the least wealthy customers, are placed behind an opt-in barrier, it leaves the banks with two strategies, both which will likely adversely effect customers who otherwise are good citizens and can skate by without paying fees.

First, the banks will enhance their marketing approach in order to convince customers that they want overdraft protection. For new account holders this is easy. A financial associate (salesperson) at a bank can ask the new account holder in person, selling the benefits of overdraft protection while downplaying the fee. For those who apply for an account online, the bank can bury the fee in an unrelated location on the website, separating the fee from the action in the applicant’s mind.

For current customers, banks can give their overdraft protection a fancy name like TD Debit Card Advance and send marketing materials through mail, email, phone, and text message, encouraging the account holders to allow the $35 fee.

Second, services for which we have grown used to accessing for free will no longer be so. I’ve managed to pay almost no banking fees for the last decade. Almost every fee I did pay in a savings or checking account was reversed. That has become more difficult in the past few years. Some of the accounts I prefer, particularly those with brick and mortar institutions like Wachovia, require minimum balances across all my accounts held there.

I expect that towards the end of the summer, banks will begin discontinuing many of their free products. Free checking will certainly be among the first of the most popular services to gradually disappear. The most popular programs across many banks, free checking for students and free checking for seniors, may be the last to go as we see free services for average, middle-class customers decrease.

Senator Chuck Schumer has already urged the Federal Reserve to ensure banks don’t penalize customers as they seek additional revenue when the cash cow of overdraft fees disappears. It’s unlikely the Fed will stop banks from adding new fees, some we may not have considered in the past. The banking industry will take a page from the airline industry’s handbook, in which every additional service has a cost to the consumer above and beyond the fare.

Like we are charged for meals on flights, banks may charge us for a monthly paper statement. Like we are charged for baggage, banks may charge us for viewing images of cleared checks. Like we are charged for changing our flight itinerary, banks may charge us for visiting a teller in person. Airlines charge us for cashing in our miles for “free” rewards, and banks may charge us for automatic bill payment services.

Perhaps banks are justified in charging account fees rather than offering free accounts. Shouldn’t a customer pay for his own service rather than expect another customer (such as one who pays overdraft fees) to subsidize the cost of operating that account?

{ 27 comments }

Overdraft Fees: Opting In

This article was written by in Banking. 32 comments.

As we’ve addressed on Consumerism Commentary before, the Federal Reserve will be requiring banking customers to opt-in to overdraft protection. The highly publicized date of the change is July 1, but this is only the date by which new customers must be free from certain overdraft fees without opting into the service.

Most of us have existing accounts, and the date we need to be concerned about it August 15. This is the deadline for banks to refrain from charging an account holder overdraft fees without explicit consent.

Banks want their customers to opt in, so they will make it as easy as possible to do so. For example, I received a pamphlet from TD Bank, where I have a checking account with a debit card, explaining how I should proceed to let the bank know that I want to be able to use my debit card to pay for something without having the funds to cover the purchase.

TD is offering a program called “TD Debit Card Advance” which covers customers who use a debit card to overdraw their account by more than $5. The bank fronts the money, which must be paid back, and charges a $35 fee. This is the same fee that is currently charged for an overdraft.

Furthermore, the pamphlet states that an overdraft fee can be avoided by making a cash deposit or account transfer by the cutoff time of the current business day pertaining to the local branch.

This change doesn’t affect customers who link a savings account to a checking account for overdraft coverage unless that savings account does not have enough funds.

I have no plans to enroll in the program. There’s no need to introduce more fees into my life, even if they are only potential fees. If I were to use my debit card, I’d prefer the purchase to be declined. That may not have been the case over ten years ago when I had no money in any bank account and still needed to pay for food and transportation.

Do you plan to choose to maintain your overdraft protection by opting in?

{ 32 comments }

One of the best methods of reading Consumerism Commentary and staying up-to-date with the latest articles and posts is through RSS subscription. By subscribing to the Consumerism Commentary RSS feed with feed-reading software such as Google Reader or aggregators such as My Yahoo, you’ll always be aware of new content here.

If you prefer to have daily updates emailed directly to you, simply enter your address below.

Enter your email address:

Your email address will be used for nothing other than daily updates generated by Consumerism Commentary. I won’t sell your email address to any third party and I won’t send you any junk mail.

Social media

Please feel free to follow me on Twitter, a social media services based on short personal updates. My updates tend to be somewhat random non sequiturs but occasionally I might write about something pertaining to personal finance. I don’t simply duplicate my RSS feed.

If you do, however, prefer to receive notifications of new Consumerism Commentary articles on twitter, follow ConsumerismComm as well.

If you’re a member of Facebook, visit the page for Consumerism Commentary and become a “fan.” Also, feel free to view my own profile and add me as a “friend.”

Top December articles

Here are the most popular articles written in December:

  1. 9 Tips for Choosing and Achieving a Purpose in Life
  2. I am Debt Free as of Today!
  3. The Best Online Savings Accounts
  4. ING Direct Electric Orange Interest Rate Drops to 0.5% APY!
  5. Personal Income Statement, November 2008
  6. Personal Balance Sheet, November 2008
  7. The Schwab Bank Invest First Visa Signature Credit Card (by Smithee)
  8. FNBO Direct Drops Interest Rate to 2.8% APY
  9. The Federal Reserve Cut is Irrelevant
  10. Coworkers Excited About Investing

{ 5 comments }

Yesterday I mentioned that the U.S. Treasury was able to raise $40 billion in a one-day auction of 35-day Treasury bills. When you bid for these investments, you could either compete with others by offering to invest at the lowest interest rate you’re willing to accept or bid “non-competitively,” accepting whatever the Treasury Department determines the rate will be. Many people are willing to lend money to the government at a rate of 0%. That sounds like a horrible deal, but here’s a few reasons why investors will bid 0% on a short-term Treasury bill.

The stock market is likely to decline. With the media reporting to collapse of Wall Street, putting your money in an investment earning 0% is a better proposition than leaving it in stocks poised to lose money in the short term. I don’t suggest market timing or guessing what the stock market will do over the short term. Did you know on Wednesday that the S&P 500 was going to be up 4.3% on Thursday? I didn’t. Nevertheless, there are situations where not losing money (in a 0% T-bill) is a better option than probably losing money (in the stock market).

More banks are likely to fail. Washington Mutual still seems to be the bank that the media is giving a hard time. It is quite possible, however, that the next bank to fail will be a surprise. As long as your money is protected by the FDIC, you will be able to withdraw your funds. You may not be able to access your funds as quickly as you like, however. Moving your savings account to a Treasury bill might earn you less interest — or it might not — but you’re guaranteed to be able to access your funds. Accepting a low interest rate is a trade-off for much less risk in a volatile environment.

Just because you bid 0% doesn’t mean you’ll get 0%. When the Treasury bill auction ends, all winning bidders get the same interest rate. Winners are chosen from the bottom up, so a low bid helps to guarantee you’ll win. But all investors will receive the interest rate of the highest winning bid. In Wednesday’s auction for 35-day T-bills, the highest interest rate accepted was 0.3%, so this is the rate all winning bidders, even those who bid 0%, received. Now 0.3% isn’t much higher than 0%, but it does match what you might be earning in a standard brick-and-mortar savings account. Bidding 0% means you won’t be bidding too high to be excluded from the issuance.

You expect the dollar’s value to increase relative to a foreign currency. If you live in Japan, for example, and do all your banking in yen, a low interest rate in USD might be a good investment if you expect the dollar to increase against the yen. If the dollar gains an annual rate of 5% against the yen over the period of the Treasury bill and your yield on the T-bill is 0.3%, then your returns after conversion back to yen would be similar to a local bank account earning 5.3%.

Bidding 0% on a Treasury bill doesn’t sound like a bad idea right now, particularly if you think the other options available for short-term investments are worse.

{ 20 comments }

The Cost of Buying a Home, Low Cost of Living, and Fed Cover-Up

by Flexo

Has anyone been watching the HBO miniseries, John Adams? Although colonial America is not my favorite period of history, I’ve been enjoying the first episodes that have aired. However, during the slower sections of the program, you may want to take the time reading articles from Consumerism Commentary’s history. From the first half of March ... Continue reading this article…

2 comments Read the full article →

This Week in the Archives: Cost of Living, Asset/Liability, Emigrant Direct

by Flexo

As you might now, I’ve been spending some time looking back at what I’ve written on Consumerism Commentary in previous years just in case any new readers happen to come by. Here are a few from March 8-15, 2006: * Mar. 8: Move Where the Cost of Living is Low (13 comments) * Mar. 9: ... Continue reading this article…

0 comments Read the full article →

Best Of 2005

by Flexo

As the year is coming to a close, and I will be less available over the next few days, the opportunity is perfect for taking a look at Consumerism Commentary and compiling a list of “best” (or most popular) entries from the year. This will be the 570th entry in 2005, but only a few ... Continue reading this article…

3 comments Read the full article →