As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: high-school

Opinions are generally clear about why such a large percentage of the American population winds up in financial jeopardy. There’s no formalized way to learn how to use money properly and with the best results; most people learn by experience. It would save a lot of headaches if we could somehow warn people in advance that they’ll need to consider finances in their choices in their life in order to build wealth over time, and that lesson would have more meaning if we could somehow extol the virtues of financial independence.

Financial literacy advocacy programs try to address this problem. Encouraging good behavior with money at an early age could help increase the probability of achieving financial success in the future. With efforts conforming to this principle, some high schools offer money management classes while some companies like ING Direct offer tools to help younger students learn about money management. Neither of these approaches have been proven to have any long-term positive effect.

Kid with moneyI’ve previously discussed the limitations with money management classes in high schools. First of all, if a child doesn’t receive the first lesson with money until he or she is a teenager, the student has already formed an attitude about money that will define the relationship during the important formative years when he or she later begins earning money for living for the first time. At the age when children are forming their money personalities, they are most influenced by parents. If the parents aren’t making an effort to set a good environment and example for handling money, it will negate any effect by a money management class as a teenager.

Most teachers are not trained in personal finance, so they cannot provide the best instruction. And without mandatory money management classes, only a small percentage of students will choose this class as an elective. Those who choose this class make this choice at the expense of other possible electives, many of which enrich the mind rather than purport to enrich the wallet.

At the same time, society can’t rely solely on parents to transmit good financial habits to their children, even if the right tools are provided by outside sources to help those parents.

The problem of poor money management skills manifests itself in lower-income communities more than middle-class areas. Change, in the form of professing the opportunities that one can enjoy through financial independence, must come from within the community. It’s important for successful individuals to be involved with the community, serving as a role model, particularly when parents don’t have the skills or resources to serve in that role. Poor financial management and a lack of economic mobility can become a cycle. As a child grows up without a great financial role model, he or she will continue to be poor role models to his or her children.

The only way out is to break the cycle, and the only way to break the cycle is for successful individuals to assume the job of parents as financial role models.

Photo: Pink Sherbet Photography

{ 22 comments }

At the right age, involving children in the household financial planning process can be a good way to teach responsible money management. Children internalize best practices when they not only receive meaningful instruction, but have visible, positive role models as parents. If parents want to impart a lesson of “buy only what you can afford,” but the intended audience sees the parents struggling with debt, buying items obviously in excess of needs, the lesson won’t get through.

Involvement and modeling are the keys to passing on good financial lessons to the next generation (not financial management classes in school, which have been shown to do more harm than good). In a discussion about allowance for kids, Consumerism Commentary reader Kilae offered the following suggestion:

Another system I read about was a couple that gave their child 10% of their household income. While it sounds ludicrous, with that 10% the child had to pay an itemized bill that was 10% of the household bills: a 10% share of the mortgage, a 10% share of the utilities, a 10% share of the grocery bill, a 10% of the long-term savings and college savings, and so on. When all was said and done, the kid had around $15 left per month as play money — not a ludicrous amount, and it showed the child exactly what the parents’ money was being used on and why budgets were important.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5259/5437895492_b0e84aaf2b_b.jpgWhile there is something to be said for shielding children from the stresses of household financial management so they can concentrate on their educational priorities, this system could be very effective. With an active role in the family’s finances, a preteen or teenager can build valuable experiences that will translate directly to how he will manage finances when his responsibilities include a household of his own.

There’s a possible social drawback. Parents should try to ensure that children do not take these lessons as admonition of a family that does not, at least outwardly, appear to manage finances with the same skill and dedication. A judgmental attitude or a feeling of financial superiority are potential effects of an intense focus on effective money management. While financial lessons are important, I prioritize teaching children not to be judgmental, particularly based on appearances.

Is requiring involvement and shared responsibility a good way to teach financial lessons to children?

Photo: stevendepolo

{ 13 comments }

I always encourage parents to find interesting ways to teach their children about responsible money management. When I do, I always lean toward behavior modeling. Children who, even at an early age, see their parents engaging in a positive relationship with money will subconsciously take what they observe to heart more than any explicit lessons they attempt to impart. Teaching financial literacy in schools is mostly a lost cause, as teachers aren’t trained for it, there isn’t enough room in the curriculum, and as Ramit pointed out, most students just won’t care enough about the subject for the lessons to have an effect. The responsibilities for teaching these lessons remains with the parents, and with many parents failing with their own money management, a good solution is almost impossible to design.

Using money as a motivational tool for children is dangerous, yet it’s common for parents to reward their children for bringing home good grades on the report card. Policies range anywhere from incentives only for As to a staggered system of rewards for any passing grade, with As receiving the highest monetary prize. These types of reward system broadcasts a few messages:

  • Results are what matter, regardless of effort or method of achieving those results.
  • Good results are rewarded with money.
  • In the case of the tiered system, mediocre results are rewarded, as well.
  • Money is the best type of reward, and success and effort are only worthwhile if a monetary reward is available.

I don’t see how any of these messages reinforce a positive relationship with money.

Results are what matter, regardless of effort or method of achieving those results. Children will link good grades with money. While most students achieve good grades by studying, working hard, paying attention in class, perfecting homework, and performing well on tests, a select frustrated few might take some shortcuts. Cheating is one way to get good grades, at least until the cheater gets caught. On the other hand, for a child who excels “naturally” in a class, they might achieve an A without any effort. In this case, the student could believe they will be ale to sail through life without developing the skills that will be necessary for their success in other tasks. Results matter, but so do attitudes and values.

Good results are rewarded with money. I often hear parents say that they wish to pay students for the work they do because this is how the real world works. I have two issues with this as it pertains to grades. First of all, students will come to expect to receive money when they perform well. Anyone who has worked in an office where people receive a pay increase just for being there or where people receive promotions based on their coziness with the boss rather than performance can attest to financial rewards are not necessarily linked to good results in the “real world.” THe distribution of money is often unfair.

Mediocre results are rewarded. Any monetary reward is enough to associate money with grades, and if there isn’t much perceived difference between the rewards for receiving grades of C, B, and A, then the children subject to this system will aim for the lowest rewarded score.

Money is the best type of reward, and success and effort are only worthwhile if a monetary reward is available. The world needs people who are solely motivated by money. I don’t think this is a complete loss unless every child decides to seek a path that they believe will lead them to the most money throughout their lifetime. This is the result of an increased focus on giving only money to children as rewards. Education and performance should be its own reward. If children see parents who value the lessons taught by schools and if parents reinforce the teachers’ goals and side with the teachers when it comes to completing work on time and accurately, they might have a better chance of getting the impression that what they are learning is important and knowledge is valued in society.

Bribing children with money if they bring home good grades is often a last resort to motivate a student when nothing else seems to work. I can’t fault any parents who have tried everything possible to help their students perform well in school, including finding tutors and seeing behavioral psychologists who specialize with children. Motivating with money doesn’t always have to be bad. If it is balanced with other messages, there is a better chance of children growing up to have a healthy relationship with money.

Disclaimer: I do not have any children, so I haven’t had any practical experience with this. I’m interested in hearing readers’ thoughts, especially from those of you who have children and have considered paying or do pay rewards for report card performance.

Update: A few days after writing this article, I came across this review and summary of Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us by Daniel H. Pink. The research outlined in this book confirms some of my thoughts about motivation that can be applied to this situation, and goes much further.

{ 37 comments }

It’s hard to compare myself with my parents. When they were my age — I’ll be thirty-five years old less than a month from now — they had two children, and the four of us were living in an apartment in upstate New York. I’m not married and I have no children. My father studied to be an environmental engineer, and I studied to be a music teacher. My situation is significantly different and probably shouldn’t be compared without making these points. When you compare yourself with your parents, you might have similar variables that make the comparison uneven.

Most middle class Americans are not better off than their parents today. When you look at average income, unless you’re in the top sliver of wealth, it has stayed roughly stagnant for at least a generation. The bottom 90% of income earners, those with incomes under $380,000 a year, have not seen their real purchasing power increase. Those in the top 1%, on the other hand, have seen their income increase by 33%, after accounting for inflation, in the past 20 years.

Even if incomes haven’t changed for middle class, the standard of living certainly has. I, and much of the middle class, can watch movies in high definition on a big screen in living rooms, while my parents had a 13-inch television. Today’s middle class dines out in restaurants frequently, while the middle class of the previous generation focused much more on cooking in the home. The middle class a generation ago didn’t place the stigma on renting an apartment rather than buying a house that today’s generation does, and it’s been normal for middle class individuals and families to own houses soon after starting a career or a family.

Another income to note is the trend over the past generation is the widening income gap between college-educated individuals and those only with high-school diplomas. The increase in education and holding different types of jobs than your parents might help in creating a feeling that you are better off.

In some cases, this feeling is misleading; a generation ago, workers entering the workforce may have had less lucrative jobs, but they had much less debt. Today’s graduates are tied to their student loan payments and credit card debt. Even for those with much better jobs than their parents, there was a sacrifice to get to that point.

Do you feel better off than your parents?

CNN Money, New York Times

{ 36 comments }

How to Get Your Spouse On Your Financial Team

by Neal Frankle

This is a guest article by Neal Frankle. Neal is a Certified Financial Planner and blogs at Wealth Pilgrim. Neal writes about taking action steps to improve clients’ financial situations and finding balance at the same time. I’ve often wondered if the posts we write about personal finance are getting into the hands of the ... Continue reading this article…

2 comments Read the full article →

Basic Finances to Finally Be Taught in NJ Schools?

by Smithee

Having done all of my formal schooling in New Jersey, some of it more successful than the rest, I was excited to see a short story in NJ’s Daily Record about a bill passing through the NJ State Senate that would require basic financial skills to be taught in High Schools. This is sorely needed ... Continue reading this article…

13 comments Read the full article →

Carnival of Personal Finance #157: Third Anniversary Edition

by Flexo

Welcome to the third anniversary edition of the Carnival of Personal Finance! It’s hard to believe the Carnival has been in operation for so long, traveling to so many different locations week after week, yet here we are, starting the Carnival’s fourth year with a presentation of some excellent articles. Last year’s second anniversary was ... Continue reading this article…

22 comments Read the full article →

Real Money, Real World: A Resource for High School Personal Finance Classes

by Flexo

Last year, I asked in high schools should require money management classes. My point of view is that such classes should be optional and/or lessons in personal finance can be incorporated into other classes throughout middle school and high school. Not everyone agrees with me, however, considering the state of financial distress many in this ... Continue reading this article…

5 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 212