As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: hud

My dentist’s office is changing billing procedure. I should note that my dentist is not part of an insurance network. It may be a cliché, but I have heard people who say that any dentist who aligns his office with insurance carriers is one you want to avoid. That doesn’t mean that I have to pay the full cost of my visits; my insurance (currently Aetna with COBRA through my former employer) still covers almost all of what my dentist charges for semi-annual maintenance. I haven’t had any problems come up, but the insurance company would cover most of that cost, as well.

As long as I have been a patient of my current dentist, the office calculates what it expects my insurance to cover before I leave the office. They submit the bill to my insurance company, and I pay the estimated remainder. It’s often not much. Occasionally, the estimate is off, and the dentist credits my account or bills me for their underestimation of the insurance company’s reimbursement. This system has worked well, at least for me. It’s less money out of my pocket than if I had to pay the full bill myself and submit the claim to my insurance company after the fact.

Starting with my next visit, approaching within the next few months, this will be the new procedure. The office has decided that rather dealing with the insurance companies directly for payment, this will be the patients’ responsibility. Before leaving the office, I will need to pay the full amount on the bill, and when I get home, I’ll need to submit a claim to my insurance company. I’m not particularly happy about the change.

I’ll need to pay more out of pocket. While the dentist office has claimed that insurance payments come within just a couple weeks, now that payments are going to a patient rather than the dentist, the claims could take longer to process. If there are any disputes, I may have less leverage than a dentist, though I have more motivation to pursue the case. I don’t like the idea that more paperwork will be my responsibility, but it’s always my responsibility to ensure I’m paying no more than I need to.

I was reminded of my dentist’s procedural change by Cameron Huddleston’s article in Kipligner. She received a bill from her doctor that was higher than she expected. She called the office to confirm that the doctor did not submit a claim to her insurance. I would imagine that some patients blindly pay any bill they receive from their doctor’s office, assuming the amount listed is what they owe after the insurance company has already covered part of the bill. It’s good to be aware of the costs of services and to review the bills.

Kiplinger

{ 15 comments }

Reverse Mortgages

This article was written by in Real Estate and Home. 24 comments.

Homeowners over the age of 62 have a unique option available for accessing cash. Reverse mortgages can help seniors access home equity without having to make monthly payments to repay a loan. When a qualifying homeowner has paid off a mortgage in full, or is very close to paying off a mortgage, a reverse mortgage (or home equity conversion mortgage) can turn the equity into cash through a payment plan. The reverse mortgage is repaid from the proceeds when the owner sells the house.

For seniors who have discovered their expenses are higher than what they’ve planned, a reverse mortgage can help pay the bills. Considering you can’t take your wealth with you when you die, there’s always a case for spending down your assets while you still have time to enjoy your life.

If those are two of the benefits to reverse mortgages, they may be easily overshadowed by the drawbacks.

  • Reverse mortgages are expensive. Just like regular mortgages, you’ll have closing fees and points to pay. They’ll be rolled into the loan amount, so when you or your estate pays back the mortgage when the home is sold or when you die, you’ll owe more than the converted equity plus interest.
  • You’ll be at the mercy of the market. Reverse mortgages have interest rates, just like regular mortgages. This interest will also add to the total you’ll need to repay the mortgage after the sale, and if this interest rate is higher than inflation, you’re losing more overall value.
  • You might not qualify for Medicaid. The proceeds from a reverse mortgage increase your income. If you’ve been relying on Medicaid, you may no longer qualify.

The first point above, the fact that reverse mortgages are expensive, is an important point to consider. Here are some of the expenses associated with reverse mortgages:

  • Mortgage insurance (2% of the appraised home value)
  • Origination fee (up to $6,000)
  • Title insurance
  • Title, attorney, and county recording fees
  • Real estate appraisal ($300–$500)
  • Survey ($300–$500)

In order to qualify for a reverse mortgage, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires you to receive counseling, which helps borrowers understand the concepts of reverse mortgages and identifies the best lenders.

Wells Fargo and Bank of America have recently exited the reverse mortgage business. They say that HUD requirements go to far to limit lender’s profitability, but in all likelihood, lenders are having a harder time making money from reverse mortgages — which were very profitable during the height of the real estate market — now that home prices are low. Reverse mortgages, like traditional mortgages, are packaged and sold to investors, and if lenders are having a difficult time finding investors for these securities, they’ll stop doing business.

While Wells Fargo and Bank of America are no longer offering reverse mortgages, MetLife is increasing its reverse mortgage business.

Due to the high fees, most reverse mortgages are seen as predatory products. I can understand the appeal of getting access to cash locked away in home equity, but it comes at a high price. Many people argue that you can’t be buried with your wealth, but there are ways to make it work for you after your die if selling your house is not appealing while you’re still alive.

Photo: Warren Brown Photography

{ 24 comments }

Today’s guest on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast is Kim McGrigg, Manager of Community and Media Relations for Money Management International (MMI), which is sponsoring Financial Literacy Month. MMI is the largest nonprofit, full-service credit counseling agency in the United States.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast #104
Financial Literacy Month: S04E26 / 128

DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents

[00:00] Introduction from Bryan J Busch
[00:35] Interview with Kim McGrigg
[00:54] Financial Literacy Month
[04:04] Cleaning up financial clutter
[05:45] Start Financial Literacy Month at any time
[07:30] Stopping calls from debt collectors
[10:13] The dangers of co-signing a loan or owning any joint account
[13:07] Skipping a mortgage payment
[14:22] Depleting savings to bring down debt
[16:56] Lending to friends or relatives
[18:06] Repairing credit
[20:28] Creditors making unusual decisions about interest rates or credit limits
[22:21] What happens if borrowers don’t pay off debt
[24:39] #FinLit on Twitter
[25:15] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

Theme music by Mindcube.

Full transcript

Read the full article →

{ 0 comments }

If you purchased a house in 2008, beware of this new change on the 2010 income tax returns. Some taxpayers who claimed the first-time home buyer tax credit will be required to pay the credit back to the government this April.

The initial $7,500 tax credit was available to homeowners who purchased their first house in 2008, but it was designed as a loan rather than a gift like the later home buyer tax credits. These taxpayers, from the start, should have been aware that the benefit received from the initial credit would need to be paid back, though I am sure most taxpayers do not know this. The credit requires that taxpayers begin repaying the benefit in two years — and that starts with 2010 tax returns. Those who claimed the credit on 2008 income tax returns need to begin repaying the credit now. Use form 5405 to calculate how much should be repaid, and this amount will be included on line 59 of form 1040.

The good news is that the IRS allows the tax credit to be paid back over a 15 year period, so there is no rush to come up with the full amount right away.

The bad news is the IRS doesn’t have complete records. For many who claimed the initial $7,500 first-time home buyer tax credit, the IRS doesn’t know whether the house was purchased in 2008 or later. I expect that many taxpayers who don’t need to repay their credit will receive a notification of the IRS falsely warning of the repayment requirement, and many who do need to repay the government will not receive a notification.

Those who qualified for the later credit with a maximum of $8,000 or the long-time homeowner credit with a maximum of $6,500 do not have to repay the government. This would require having purchased a house in 2009 or 2010. In those later years, the tax credit was not a loan, it was a gift. The IRS is identifying discrepancies in their records before sending out notices, but perfection will always be a fantasy.

If you receive a notice to repay your homebuyer tax credit but you believe your credit was one of the later credits, give the IRS a call and have your HUD-1 settlement statement ready.

{ 14 comments }

Win $10,000 for Tuition or a $500 Gift Card

by Flexo

Upromise is sponsoring a contest in honor of Financial Literacy Month. There are two grand prizes of $10,000, cash that can be used for higher education expenses. We touched on the topic of the cost of education on yesterday’s podcast with financial columnist Kara McGuire. I have no children, but thinking about potential children’s projected ... Continue reading this article…

3 comments Read the full article →

Smithee’s First Week With Only $100

by Smithee

In my most recent debt update, I re-committed to spending a fixed amount of money on discretionary items during the week, instead of trusting my self-disciplined use of a credit card. I got $100.00 out of the ATM last Saturday, and the experiment began. See, I’m still not sure if $100.00 per week is reasonable. ... Continue reading this article…

10 comments Read the full article →

In Detail: How to Claim the New Home Buyer Tax Credit on 2009 Tax Returns

by Flexo

In November of last year, President Obama and Congress expanded the home buyer tax credit to cover more people who have purchased houses in 2009 and 2010 and to further stimulate the real estate industry. Earlier this month, the IRS released an updated tax form to include the new rules. If you want to claim ... Continue reading this article…

140 comments Read the full article →

The Madoff Name Premium

by Flexo

On Saturday, an auction in New York featured items once owned by Bernard Madoff. The auction raised over $900,000, beating expectations. Once combined with proceeds from another auction later this week, it’s likely that this money will go to investors who were burned by Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Here are some of the items that received ... Continue reading this article…

3 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 3123