As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: interest-rate

While the mainstream financial industry has faced a dizzying array of government and quasi-government regulations through most of the last one hundred years, non-bank financial products have, for the most part, evaded regulations. Catering to lower-income communities, payday loan storefronts and check cashing establishments have managed to justify their business models. The more desperate you are to pay your electricity bills and your rent before your power is turned off and you’re evicted, the more likely you are to willfully ignore the fact that the companies helping you are taking advantage of you in ways that a traditional bank would never be allowed to do.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is now charged with recommending new regulations that go beyond retail banks, thrifts, investment banks, and credit unions into the murky world of non-bank financial products.

If you compare a short-term payday loan with a loan from a bank, you might see that the payday loan’s equivalent interest rate (APR) is 450% or even higher. Mortgages tend to be 3% to 7%, business and personal loans could be 5% to 10%, and credit cards are 10% to 20% unless you default. Anything higher, and the loan might be considered usurious. So how do payday lenders get away with charging 450% or more?

Well, these lenders frame what they charge as a flat or sliding fee, not interest. The loans are typically due in two weeks, the expected arrival of your next paycheck. It might not be fair to compare these fees with interest rates, because the borrower doesn’t hold onto the loan for a long time.

Or does he? There’s some evidence suggesting payday loans create a cycle; rather than paying off the loan when the next paycheck arrives, lenders offer an enticing deal to encourage borrowers to begin the next loan. The two-week cycle repeats.

The CFPB wants to hear from people who have had experiences with payday lenders. In order to get a good grasp on how non-bank financial products can and should be regulated, the organization is seeking comments from the public. What have been your experiences with payday loans? Feel free to share here on Consumerism Commentary, or tell the CFPB your story directly.

Photo: bigburpsx3

{ 7 comments }

Born in the 1970s, I didn’t get to experience the days when anyone with a bank account could earn 18% APY in their savings. When I started being aware of interest rates — something that didn’t happen for me until I was out of college, struggling to earn a living, and thinking of a savings account as something I might never afford to have — the concept of online banking had already taken off. Brick and mortar banks were offering paltry interest while NetBank and ING Direct were offering higher interest rates and sign-on bonuses. This is the reality for every generation from Generation Y on down; superior products are often available to those who wish to look past the traditional teller-based banking system.

What is the point of saving? The financial media place the strongest emphasis on interest rate — the fee banks pay depositors for the privilege of using the customers’ money. The interest rate is important, of course, but this singular focus leads to the idea that a savings account is a type of investment. Customers often chase the highest interest rates blindly and get upset when their savings, even at the highest interest rates offered today, lose purchasing power thanks to inflation.

Savings accounts were never meant to be investments. They do play a role in investing by being a super-safe (no-risk) option for investors looking to balance the riskier (and potentially more rewarding) selections in the portfolios. This safety feature drives people to savings. Besides being a foil to riskier investments, everyday savings is best for any money you think you’ll need to use in the next year, including or in addition to a good portion of your emergency fund.

How do you know which savings account is best? Since my first introduction to online saving, the number of options for banking with savings accounts, online and offline, has grown. To muddle through the myriad banks and accounts, focus on specific criteria for making your selection. There are four basic criteria for a bank account. In order of importance:

  1. Stability
  2. Accessibility
  3. Interest income
  4. Service

Stability. When it comes to savings, stability comes first. While it’s good to be a customer of a solid bank, any bank can fail. When yours does, FDIC protection will ensure your money is never lost. While you may believe that some banks are more stable than others, unless you’ve personally reviewed their balance sheets and cash flow statements, you’re relying on marketing for your judgment. Big banks are perceived as the safest, but they often have trouble in major financial crises. Small banks fail, too, and there are many more of them than large banks.

Big or well-known banks in the United States always have FDIC insurance. If you are unsure, look for the FDIC logo or use FDIC’s search engine to review the bank before you deposit. Credit unions have insurance coverage from the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and this coverage is similar and as effective as FDIC insurance.

Accessibility. If your money is in a bank that has no branches near your living or working location, you might have a delay getting your money when you need it. This is the one drawback to online-only accounts; if I want to see that money, I need to first initiate a transfer to a local brick-and-mortar bank and withdraw the funds from there. That process could result in a delay of at least two business days. That’s one reason I suggest a tiered emergency fund.

Interest income. Most savers might not profit enough from a 0.1 percentage point difference between banks, so chasing the highest interest does not always pay off. Chances are good that the interest rate you receive, especially after taxes are paid, will not exceed the rate of inflation. Over time, the purchasing power of your money in savings decreases, but it decreases much less than it would if you were leaving your savings outside of the banking system. Earning interest in your cash isn’t really investing, but compound interest will benefit your balance over time.

Service. Having good customer service, including good tools for customers like websites and mobile access, is the number one reason a saver is likely to stay with a bank. As ING Direct fell from its reigning position at the top of the interest charts, many customers stayed with the bank thanks to their easy-to-use website and friendly customer service, though inertia likely played a role as well.

ING Direct, Ally Bank, and Discover Bank have been cited recently for offering the best all-around savings accounts. I’ve been a customer of these three banks and many others, and I offer my reviews and suggestions here.

Photo: Bytemarks

{ 6 comments }

No one’s happy with savings account interest rates these days. Even so-called high-yield savings accounts are closer to zero than they have been in a long time. For me, they heyday of savings accounts was when they were earning 5% to 6% APY several years ago. Some people remember when savings accounts earned interest rates in the double digits.

In a world where debt is vilified, habitual savers feel neglected. They played by the rules and now there’s no longer a reward.

An article on Million Dollar Journey includes some reasons why low interest rates are a good thing. First, interest rates need to have inflation taken out of the picture to be meaningful. Rather than the interest rates that banks report, we should look at the spread between the rate of inflation and our interest rate. The higher the spread, with the interest rate being the higher rate, the better off savers are. If inflation is 0.5% when interest rates are 1.5%, the real interest rate is 1.0%. If inflation is 4% and interest rates are 4.5%, the real interest rate is only 0.5%. In this example, the lower interest rate of 1.5% is “better” than the higher interest rate of 4.5%.

This reasoning fails because it relies on the government-reported rate of inflation. Even in today’s low-inflation economy, costs of necessities are rising. The inflation rate may be close to zero, but real costs that people experience are going up. This increase is not going to be covered by bank accounts earning low interest. In theory, purchasing power doesn’t decrease as long as the interest rate stays about inflation, but in practice, that’s rarely the case.

The article also declares that you’re better off earning less interest in a taxable account, such as a savings account, because you’ll owe less tax. This is a crazy argument. It’s the same argument that people use when they say they want to work because hours because they’re afraid of being bumped into the next tax bracket. Almost all the time, more income is still more income.

It’s more tax, too, but not more tax than more income. If you earn $50 in interest, you may owe $10 in tax. You get to keep $40. If you earn $500 in interest, you may owe $100. You get to keep $400. Maybe you’re in a higher tax bracket, and you get to keep only $350. $350 is greater than $40, and therefore, it’s better to earn more money. This is a simplified example, but it’s rare that interest would be the cause of you owing significantly more tax to the government, and you certainly wouldn’t be owing so much that you get to keep less than you could if you had earned only $50 in interest.

The conclusion remains the same: analyze your risk, invest your money appropriately, and buy appreciating assets if they are on sale. Leave only as much as you need liquid in cash. Take the low interest rates for now for any amount of money that you may need to get to quickly. Don’t chase riskier investments just because the rates are low.

If the purpose of an interest-bearing account is to protect your purchasing power, most savings accounts fail on a personal level because the increase in our expenses never seem to follow the official inflation rates.

{ 24 comments }

Updated: The media are calling the new Wall Street Reform Law, recently signed by President Obama, the most significant reform of the financial industry since the Great Depression. It looks to tighten the reins on a industry that helped cause the recent recession by requiring the Federal Reserve to create and enforce regulations on the financial industry. The law, whose formal name is the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 (H.R.4173), is designed to protect consumers, corporations, and the economy as a whole.

Here are the major provisions contained within the law.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will exist inside the Federal Reserve. This organization will advise the Federal Reserve on issues such as changes to credit card statements and contracts, in order to help consumers understand the terms of their agreements. The result should be that credit cards and other financial products become more simplified. In addition, as more states take out payday lenders, I expect this agency to do the same on a federal level.

Enhanced free credit products will now be available. While consumers can currently obtain three annual free credit reports, one from each reporting agency, the government will now require these companies to offer free credit scores as well. While this is a positive move, I expect the availability of these scores will encourage companies to develop a new secret formula for making lending decisions.

The agency will likely limit credit card interchange fees to what is reasonable based on the cost of providing the service. As Smithee mentioned in May, swipe fees make a lot of money for certain companies involved with every use of a credit or debit card, and there is a general thought that these fees are currently uncompetitive.

Borrowers will need to document their income before qualifying for loans. Call them liar loans, no-documentation loans, or alt-a loans, these mortgages offer higher rates to individuals who for whatever reason can’t support their income with proper documentation like tax returns or pay stubs. It will be more difficult for certain consumers to obtain financing with this law in place.

Financial regulators will have a larger role in looking for systemic risk with banks and other financial institutions that are too big too fail. Large financial companies will have the same opportunity as large banks to unwind slowly in a controlled crash. The FDIC’s role will expand beyond pure banking institutions. Large institutions may also be forced to split into several smaller companies to better manage risk to the entire financial system.

The Government Accountability Office will be able to audit the Federal Reserve two years after the Fed takes emergency actions. I assume this two year buffer will allow the effect of the Fed’s actions to echo throughout the markets without immediate interruption.

Executive compensation will be regulated, in all publicly-traded companies, not just in the financial industry. There is not a lot of teeth to this regulation, as it provides for shareholders to have a non-binding advisory role. The problem with this is major shareholders are often executives, board members, and institutional funds that are usually willing to advise the company to spend the money. In addition, the shareholders’ decisions can be ignored by the company.

The bigger part of this part of the law is the encouragement for industries to self-regulate executive pay. I don’t expect much will change in executive compensation as a result of this law; in fact, it might encourage more corporations to become or remain privately-owned companies.

What do you think of the new financial regulation? Does it go too far or not far enough? Will it save or kill the financial industry? Will the new law be enforced?

Read the text of H.R.4173.

{ 40 comments }

Sallie Mae Bank Savings Account Opening Review

by Flexo

At the beginning of March, the banking arm of Sallie Mae, a publicly-traded corporation whose main business is student loans, began offering high-yield savings accounts. As I’ve mentioned before, “high-yield” is currently a joke; just a few years ago, you could deposit cash in high-yield savings accounts and count on slightly beating inflation. It is ... Continue reading this article…

20 comments Read the full article →

Ally Bank: Kiplinger’s Rated Best Savings Account

by Flexo

At the end of 2008, the editors of Kiplinger’s Personal Finance magazine selected FNBO Direct as their favorite savings account. Since that time, the banking landscape has changed. From the ashes of GMAC Bank rose Ally Bank offering competitive interest rates. Kiplinger’s chose Ally Bank as the best savings account of 2009. You can read ... Continue reading this article…

10 comments Read the full article →

GMAC Asking for a Third Bailout From Taxpayers

by Flexo

Through today, GMAC has received government bailout funds totaling $12.5 billion. The company is asking the Obama administration for $5.6 billion more. One might say that in a true democracy, GMAC would need to ask permission from each taxpayer whose funds would go towards shoring up the company’s balance sheet, a move that would make ... Continue reading this article…

22 comments Read the full article →

Ally Bank Increases Interest Rate

by Flexo

When I started formally tracking high-yield savings rates, with a shared online spreadsheet, it was common to see banks offering interest rates above 5.0 percent APY. That was in January 2008, and the economy is in a different situation now. According to the government, there has been no measurable inflation, and now interest rates for lending ... Continue reading this article…

4 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 512345