As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: jeopardy

Opinions are generally clear about why such a large percentage of the American population winds up in financial jeopardy. There’s no formalized way to learn how to use money properly and with the best results; most people learn by experience. It would save a lot of headaches if we could somehow warn people in advance that they’ll need to consider finances in their choices in their life in order to build wealth over time, and that lesson would have more meaning if we could somehow extol the virtues of financial independence.

Financial literacy advocacy programs try to address this problem. Encouraging good behavior with money at an early age could help increase the probability of achieving financial success in the future. With efforts conforming to this principle, some high schools offer money management classes while some companies like ING Direct offer tools to help younger students learn about money management. Neither of these approaches have been proven to have any long-term positive effect.

Kid with moneyI’ve previously discussed the limitations with money management classes in high schools. First of all, if a child doesn’t receive the first lesson with money until he or she is a teenager, the student has already formed an attitude about money that will define the relationship during the important formative years when he or she later begins earning money for living for the first time. At the age when children are forming their money personalities, they are most influenced by parents. If the parents aren’t making an effort to set a good environment and example for handling money, it will negate any effect by a money management class as a teenager.

Most teachers are not trained in personal finance, so they cannot provide the best instruction. And without mandatory money management classes, only a small percentage of students will choose this class as an elective. Those who choose this class make this choice at the expense of other possible electives, many of which enrich the mind rather than purport to enrich the wallet.

At the same time, society can’t rely solely on parents to transmit good financial habits to their children, even if the right tools are provided by outside sources to help those parents.

The problem of poor money management skills manifests itself in lower-income communities more than middle-class areas. Change, in the form of professing the opportunities that one can enjoy through financial independence, must come from within the community. It’s important for successful individuals to be involved with the community, serving as a role model, particularly when parents don’t have the skills or resources to serve in that role. Poor financial management and a lack of economic mobility can become a cycle. As a child grows up without a great financial role model, he or she will continue to be poor role models to his or her children.

The only way out is to break the cycle, and the only way to break the cycle is for successful individuals to assume the job of parents as financial role models.

Photo: Pink Sherbet Photography

{ 22 comments }

As many Presidents of the United States have done, President Obama avoided confrontation with Congress by appointing an individual to direct a government organization while lawmakers were on recess. Yesterday, the President appointed former Ohio attorney general Richard Cordray to the long-delayed position of director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Now that this department has a director, it can move forward in enacting regulations — not just suggestions — for non-bank financial entities.

Lately, the CFPB has been working on simplifying customer agreements for financial accounts. A great example is this redesigned credit card agreements. The new design highlights the important terms of the agreement, describes financial terms in plain language, and helps consumers increase awareness of their obligations and rights. The bureau is currently working on a similar resigned agreement for mortgage contracts.

Richard CordrayWithout a director, none of these recommendations would be required to be enacted by financial firms. Some banks have already taken steps to improve communication, but banks are also regulated by the Federal Reserve. The Fed issued some regulations as part of the Credit CARD Act of 2009, but the regulations do not extend to non-bank financial firms.

The CFPB may face legal challenges from industry groups who insist that the bureau can have no power to issue regulations.

Who is Richard Cordray?

When Richard Cordray was the attorney general in Ohio, and when he was Ohio’s treasurer before assuming the role of attorney general, I would receive marketing emails from him every couple of months. He championed pro-consumer causes and worked to ensure the public had a better understanding of predatory financial arrangements. His emails were directed at the press to help raise issues in the media. For example, he campaigned for closing loopholes that allows payday lenders to practice predatory tactics and he warned consumers of scams related to the Cash for Clunkers program. Cordray lost in his campaign to be re-elected attorney general in Ohio.

Cordray wasn’t without enemies in the banking industry. He filed a lawsuit against Bank of America and its executives in 2009 on behalf of Ohio’s state pension funds related to the acquisition of Merrill Lynch.

Cordray is also a five-time champion on Jeopardy.

In general, judging by his past actions, Cordray appears to be comfortable with a position strongly in opposition with Wall Street interests, which is a change in direction for Washington politicians for as long as I’ve been an adult. Clinton, Bush II, and Obama have all, despite occasional moments of pro-consumer rhetoric, appointed Wall Street insiders to major financial roles in government and pseudo-government agencies.

There is some validity to that philosophy, after all, Wall Street executives have the connections and relationships with other Wall Street executives, and these connections are necessary for the government to operate efficiently with one of the largest driving forces of the American and global economy. The government, however, can’t be expected to issue effective regulations if it needs to stay on Wall Street’s “good side,” however.

It’s a tough balance to manage, and it’s one of the many reasons why I avoid politics.

Photo: Richard Cordray

{ 14 comments }

The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) is one section of the tax code everyone, regardless of political party affiliation, seems to hate. Originally designed to ensure the wealthiest Americans wouldn’t be able to avoid paying a fair share of tax, the AMT isn’t adjusted for inflation, so an increasing number of not-as-wealthy Americans are subject to higher tax bills.

Right now, politicians are concerned with the debt ceiling. Congress limits the amount of debt the federal government can owe, and this maximum must be raised every so often because essentially the economy runs on debt and relies on debt to operate. A special bipartisan team in Congress, the “Gang of Six,” now leads the charge in determining how to prevent disaster while keeping as many politicians in Washington as satisfied as possible.

If nothing is done about the debt ceiling, politicians and economists do claim there could be a financial disaster. While this has never happened in the past, and every time the subject has come up it has been resolved, experts speculate about the outcomes.

  • The government won’t be able to send out checks to federal workers and military personnel.
  • Federal benefit recipients, like those on Social Security, Medicare, or unemployment, will not receive checks.
  • The United States debt would be downgraded by rating agencies, making it less likely investors will buy federal bonds.

Any faith that people, particularly investors, around the world have in the (financial) stability of the U.S. government will be in jeopardy. This is a situation for which neither Democrats or Republicans want to accept the blame. The Gang of Six allows a few motivated members of Congress to work out a deal while the remainder bicker, posture, and try to work their public relations to help sure their outlook is favorable for the next election.

Part of the Gang of Six’s recommendations is the elimination of the Alternative Minimum Tax. This, along with $4 trillion in spending cuts, the Gang believes will allow Congress to agree on raising the debt ceiling. There have been many attempts to eliminate the AMT throughout the past few years, but Congress has never been motivated to follow through with the proposals. This time could be different.

Fortune

{ 20 comments }

A Consumerism Commentary reader wrote in with a simple question which should have a simple answer: What percentage of income should a person spend on hobbies? I enjoy talking about hobbies. I have a wide variety of interests, and many of these have little prospect of making money for me for the time being. This is a great question. There are a number of factors someone should consider when deciding how much money to spend on activities that don’t generate any income.

Although a hobby doesn’t generate income now, it might surprise you in the future. I started writing Consumerism Commentary as a hobby, without any thought of being able to earn money from a blog. Now my hobby has become my primary source of income — and it’s great being able to earn money doing something I enjoy.

On the other hand, I’ve spent money on photography, and that hasn’t generated much in the way of financial return for me yet. I expect this is the type of of hobby the reader might be thinking about. It’s not an issue of how much of your income you can afford to spend on a hobby because that will depend on your necessary expenses. If your after-tax income is already dedicated 30% to your mortgage, 20% for food, 20% for utilities, 10% for transportation, 10% for saving for the future, and 5% for paying off debt, you only have 5% left to play with before tapping the income you’ve dedicated to your future.

I wholeheartedly believe that life is about living and that it’s always worthwhile to spend time and some money on activities that make you happy. It’s not always easy, though, when your concern is making all the bills and having enough left over to build a future. If you have excess income after meeting your obligations including saving, using 50% of whatever is left for your hobbies can’t hurt.

Some hobbies are more expensive than others, so find ways to achieve the same level of enjoyment through spending less money. Taking a frugal approach to the activities you enjoy can help the money you set aside for hobbies last longer. If you like photography, buy used cameras and lenses. If you write short science fiction stories, put off the new computer purchase and skip Dragon-Con for a year.

There is no good answer in terms of percentage of income. When it comes to activities that add joy to your life, spend as much as you want as long as it’s not detrimental to your current or future financial situation.

After paying for all your necessary expenses and after saving for the future in line with your goals, spend anything that’s left over on activities you enjoy. That may be 1% of your income or 10%, but as long as you’re not putting your future in jeopardy, you need to enjoy the time you have.

Readers: how much of your income do you spend on your hobbies?

{ 7 comments }

Is a Graduate Degree Worthwhile or Worthless?

by Flexo

Several years ago, I decided to take advantage of an opportunity to pursue a master’s degree in business. I had been working in finance for a while, and as someone who believes in lifelong education, I figured it wouldn’t hurt to obtain an MBA. I took the relatively unpopular route of pursuing a degree where ... Continue reading this article…

18 comments Read the full article →

Take a Financial Health Day to Organize Your Finances

by Flexo

Ron Lieber, a columnist for the New York Times, spent one day focusing on the financial tasks that he had been neglected. He calls this day a “fiscal health day,” like the mental health days everyone needs to take once in a while to remain a functional human being. I think this is a great ... Continue reading this article…

6 comments Read the full article →

Ken Jennings’ Quote of the Day and What Would You Do With $1.5 Million?

by Flexo

Ken Jennings was popular for a while as a major winner on Jeopardy. In the tournament, he went home with $2.5m. A windfall like this can inspire inaction or poor decisions. Ken Jennings has advice for those in this position: “Put your money somewhere not idiotic and leave it alone as much as possible.” What ... Continue reading this article…

16 comments Read the full article →