As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: mpg

When gasoline prices at the pump increased to the point where the cost was a major news item engendering backlash among the public, oil companies were sporting big profits. Consumers reacted by buying more fuel-efficient cars and traveling less, but there is another approach for investors — an approach that mimics what commodities and hedge fund traders do. There are a few suggested approaches, but some work better than others.

One approach is to simply buy stock in the companies that are increasing prices to hedge against cost increases. The theory is that if prices of consumable goods increase to drive profits for the company, owning part of the company will turn those higher expenses to investment returns.

A quick check of gas price data and Exxon Mobil’s performance shoes that stock prices don’t always correlate with an increase in gas prices, but Exxon Mobil did provide dividends to investors during the last major period of gas price increases, from December 2008 to now. Investors during this time would have received $5 per share in dividends. If you estimate you’ve paid $5,000 more in total gasoline costs since December 2008 than you would have if gas had remained at $1.70 per gallon — and this is an assumption I’ll continue to use here — it would have taken 1,000 shares of XOM to earn that back in dividends. Those 1,000 shares would have cost a total of $80,000 in December 2008 and they’d be worth only $72,000 today.

Gas Pump Fuel | crowt59This strategy would not have been very efficient. What about industry ETFs? The United States oil ETF, USO, would have seen performance not quite as bad as XOM over this period, but there would be no dividends. Investing directly in companies that profit from higher prices does not seem to be a winning strategy.

A bunch better choice would be an ETF that tracks gas prices closely, regardless of the stock performance of the companies involved with delivering gas to the consumer. Over this time period from December 2008 to today, UGA, an ETF that takes this approached, has increased 130%. Gas prices increased from about $1.70 to about $3.60 per gallon, or an increase of 111%. This seems to be the better approach for hedging against gasoline price increases. From an absolute dollar perspective, earning back the $5,000 in additional gasoline expense over this period would have required an initial investment of $3,850, a more reasonable down payment.

There are other ways to hedge gas prices, like selling put options on UGA. If you’re willing to gamble that UGA will trade at a certain minimum price on a certain day in the future, you can take a profit to help offset your gasoline expenses. If you take that bet and UGA is not trading at that price, you could lose money on the trade, but you’d be paying less at the pump, so you’ve saved money anyway. I think buying the ETF is a better idea for most investors than dealing with options.

Another option, in combination with investing, is to ensure you’re getting the best prices for the gasoline you buy. It doesn’t make too much sense to drive out of your way to get to the isolated station with the lowest price, but be aware of your options. Find the best gas credit card for you and use it to earn cash back, but be wary of stations that charge different prices depending on whether you use cash or credit.

If you are planning to buy a new car, consider cars rated with high gas mileage. The effects of these ratings aren’t linear; a 5 MPG upgrade from a 15 MPG vehicle to a 20 MPG vehicle has more of an effect on your finances than a 5 MPG upgrade from a 35 MPG vehicle to a 40 MPG vehicle, but it’s clear that a 40 MPG vehicle, while slightly better than 35 MPG, is a significant improvement over 15 MPG. Efficiency has its own environmental benefits beyond the cost of fuel, so some people may feel it’s worthwhile to buy fuel-efficient cars even if the higher prices make overall cost savings (including car price and gas) harder to achieve.

Right now, gas prices may not be the biggest financial concern for a family. The public now expects high prices despite not too long ago bemoaning when prices climbed above $1 per gallon. Transportation can be a significant expense for a family, though, particularly in locations where the career economy is based mostly on commutation, like New Jersey and California.

Photo: crowt59
Gasbuddy

{ 10 comments }

Before my girlfriend purchased a new car, she was always careful to refuel her old car before the gas gauge dipped below a quarter of a tank. I’ve been living on the edge, letting my gauge drop to one-eighth of a tank or less before refueling. Her concern was that the gauge didn’t seem very accurate; the needle traveled from one quarter to empty much faster than it moved from full to three quarters. No one wanted to be stuck on the side of the road without gas in the tank.

Consumer Reports offers some tips to avoid the damage you could cause to your car by letting the fuel tank approach empty.

  • Keep your gas tank no less than one quarter full.
  • Fill up before heading out on a long trip or to work as you could get stuck in traffic and have a longer ride than intended.
  • Don’t rely on your car to tell you how many miles are left, as those range numbers can be deceiving and run down quickly, depending on how you drive.
  • We all want to save money at the pump, but instead of driving miles away to the gas station, use online tools or even smart phone apps to find the cheapest gas near your house.

In addition to these tips, the article explains the mechanical problems that could result after not applying these suggestions. Of course, you could avoid some of these problems by moving from gasoline fuel to electricity. Electric cars may not be perfect replacements right now, but they do offer a way to distance a driver from oil companies and gas stations. In addition, electric cars will benefit from the newly designed EPA window stickers.

The new stickers have more numbers to understand. The sticker pictured here applies to gasoline vehicles, but electric vehicles have a sticker with even more numbers, including a measurement called MPGe, the equivalent MPG in a gas-powered car. The best electric cars get 99 MPGe.

These new stickers allow you to compare an estimated annual fuel cost as well as how much you would save per year compared to the average car in any particular vehicle class. What’s even more interesting for technologically savvy buyers is the QR code. Each sticker contains a QR code that can be scanned by mobile phones. When the code is scanned, it will bring you to a government website where you can use the car’s data to customize the calculations of cost based on your personal usage and driving habits.

The EPA stickers for gasoline-powered cars include a new calculation called gallons per 100 miles. This can be a more effective calculation for comparing vehicles because it takes into account the fact that a one mile-per-gallon difference between gas guzzlers is more significant than one mile-per-gallon difference between more economical cars. For example, while the difference between 20 MPG and 25 MPG is the same as the difference between 35 MPG and 40 MPG, if converted to gallons per 100 miles, the difference between the less fuel efficient cars (5 GPHM vs. 4 GPHM) is more than the difference between the more fuel efficient cars (2.86 GPHM vs. 2.5 GPHM). This type of calculation makes more sense when you consider that most people have a constant driving distance. People don’t base their driving on the gallons they’d like to use, so that is a variable. The constant belongs in the denominator; in other worse, GPHM is better represents the reality of driving.

Photo: vallis-clausa
Consumer Reports

{ 15 comments }

I got lucky: I decided to leave my job, and the associated daily commute, around the time gas prices started rising faster. Now, with more unrest in northern Africa, a gallon of gasoline at the pump costs more than $3.50 on average, with some location sporting a price north of $4.00. High gas prices, though they may be more equitable compared with prices in other locations around the world, could stall our economy as we still are trying to find our way out of a recession. The best options for dealing with high prices involve changing our own habits and decisions.

Here are some suggestions for softening the effect of increasing gasoline prices.

1. Work from home more often. A good rule of thumb is to try to add an additional day outside of the office for every 20% gas price increase. This may not be practical depending on the type of job you have, but if working remotely is an option, taking advantage of the opportunity will help save a significant amount of money over the course of a year.

2. Invest in oil as a hedge. It may not be perfect, but for the most part, gas prices increase along with the price of crude oil, while gas prices eventually decrease when crude oil gets significantly cheaper. Investing in an oil fund like the Vanguard Energy ETF will help your net worth increase to offset your loss of cash flow. If you gas expenses are fixed on a volume basis — always a similar number of gallons consumed each week — then you can modify your investment to match.

3. Buy a better car. If you already have a vehicle that’s considered energy efficient, it may not pay off to replace that car with one that’s slightly more efficient. The difference between 15 mpg and 20 mpg and the difference between 35 mpg and 40 mpg are both 5 mpg, but the former example has a much stronger energy-saving effect than the latter. To reduce your gas expenses significantly, look beyond these incremental changes and consider a paradigm shift. It may mean that you’re spending more money up front for newer technology, and you may never reclaim that cost through savings on fuel, but for alternative energy to make an impact, it will take long-term thinking and an expensive initial outlay.

4. Move closer to your office. Another way of reducing your commute is finding a way to live closer to where you work. When I worked for a non-profit organization in 2000 and 2001, at the same time gas prices started spiking, I had just realized my finances would not be able to handle the commute much longer. I decided to move to be ten minutes from my office rather than ninety minutes away. It was certainly a sacrifice, because my living conditions changed significantly, but it was a necessary decision at the time.

5. Car pool. You can cut your fuel expense by 80% by sharing a ride with four other people who both live and work near you. Car pooling is not always possible, but with some creative approaches, sharing a ride can still be a way to save some money.

6. Take public transportation. This isn’t possible in most areas of the country, unfortunately. Even in New Jersey, where we have an extensive train system, not every community is services by trains or buses. Public transportation is also subject to the cost of fuel through increased fares. While I took the train to my office during the period of time I functioned without a car, our fares increased several times. There were discount programs available, and my office even offered a commutation reimbursement benefit, but the effect of increased gas prices still hit me.

7. Buy using a gas rewards credit card. The main argument against using a credit card is that people generally spend more than they would with cash. I don’t see that as a problem if you have a card that you use only for gas purchases. The amount of gas you buy is a fixed amount based on your driving habits, which are unlikely to change. If you can afford the gas you buy, you might as well get some cash back for buying the fuel your car needs. The most obvious choices are the Chase Freedom Visa – $150 Bonus Cash Back and the Pen Fed VISA Platinum Gas / Cash Rewards Card, both offering 5% cash back on your gas purchases. With the Chase card, you’ll also benefit from a $100 bonus. Read more about these cards and other choices here.

What are your suggestions for reducing the effect of high gas prices?

Photo: Robb North

{ 25 comments }

“Hypermiling” is a word we use for doing everything you can to squeeze the best mileage possible from your car, including hardware modifications which may or may not void your warranty and certain driving techniques which may be both dangerous and illegal. You may have seen some of these tested on Mythbusters, such as driving ten feet behind an 18-wheeler.

It’s fun to read about, but I won’t be doing any of that, myself. However, somewhat buried in a story about “mileage maniacs” in Japan, I found the idea of using only your big toe on the accelerator. This doesn’t seem to add any danger, because I’m still breaking with my other foot which is normally shod. And except for days on which I wear boots, it’s easy enough to slip one shoe off after I get in the driver’s seat.

So I decided to run a little experiment. This first screenshot shows what my normal morning commute looks like, mileage-wise. I take surface streets in the morning, because the traffic is negligible between 6:00 and 7:00 AM, and I don’t go more than 45 mph:

And here’s what it looked like the next day, when I removed my right shoe:

On both days I had the music on like normal, and neither day had more stoplights than the other, at least at first. The last five minutes on day two were kind of a traffic beating, but that’s bound to happen from time to time. What’s more important, I think, is that when I was shoeless, I got up over the 50 mpg hurdle much faster. Why is this happening?

I think that when you’re using just your toe, you’re putting less pressure on the pedal as a matter of course, and your body encourages your brain to think harder about how you should be accelerating. Also, and this may be psychosomatic, the engine noise seems more apparent to me, and I don’t want to hear any crunchy revving noises, so I back off more often.

I’ll keep running my experiments, and I hope you consider performing your own. This looks like a great way to save a few dollars a week without even trying.

JBloomberg

{ 10 comments }

Kelley Blue Book Announces the Top 10 Green Cars

by Flexo

As gas prices increase, you can save some money by buying a more environmentally friendly vehicles. That may only be true when evaluating the cost of gas over time, however. Hybrid and other cars that rely on energy sources other than gasoline may cost more to own over the long-term when you consider the initial ... Continue reading this article…

11 comments Read the full article →

Cash For Clunkers Suspended

by Flexo

Editor’s Note: This program is back on again and should be available through Labor Day, 2009 All good things must come to an end, and in some cases, prematurely. The “Cash for Clunkers” Program, or more formally, the Car Allowance Rebate System, has allocated almost all of its budget to rebates after only four days. ... Continue reading this article…

6 comments Read the full article →

EPA Disqualifies Shoppers From Cash for Clunkers Program

by Flexo

The Cash for Clunkers Program went into effect recently, but so did changes to the official EPA-estimated mpg ratings of several cars. For example, the 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis, according to CNN Money, was rated a combined 18 mpg last week, but as the program began this week, the rating for this year, make and ... Continue reading this article…

8 comments Read the full article →

The Cash for Clunkers Program

by Smithee

Editor’s note: The program which was once suspended is still available through Labor Day, 2009. Yesterday the U.S. Senate passed a War funding appropriations bill that paradoxically included a piece of legislation popularly referred to as the “Cash for Clunkers” program. In an earlier article where Flexo pointed out the weirdness of including “guns in ... Continue reading this article…

24 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 212