As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: portfolio


Passive income is the Holy Grail of financial independence. Although modern Western society and capitalism relies on the Puritan work ethic, the idea that labor is a value to society and hard work is the path to a spiritual and successful life, most people would prefer not to trade their time and effort for an opportunity to survive financially.

There are good reasons. The work ethic is designed to benefit employers, not employees. Even though the labor movement worked hard to ensure humane conditions for employees, in the business world, the idea of spending countless hours at the office is rewarded in some working environments. Employees are made to feel guilty about desiring work/life balance, as excellence in an organization is a goal that requires a measure of imbalance. Unwavering dedication to the job above all other priorities is rewarded.

MoneyThis approach might make sense if a job is also a passion, but for the vast majority of people, passions exist outside the office. Families, hobbies, and personal missions all have higher importance on the scale of values, but they often don’t have the ability to provide the financial incentive necessary to make life easier for families, hobbies, and personal missions. When eight or more hours of the day are lacking passion, the results are the tired memes of the ordinary workplace:

  • Is it Friday yet?
  • I can’t wait to get out of here.
  • She’s retiring this year; she’s lucky.
  • My coworkers are so annoying.
  • The boss expects too much and then raises the bar when I exceed expectations.
  • I can’t get anywhere in this job.

The list goes on.

It’s no wonder at all people view the idea of passive income as salvation. Rather than trading in effort and time for a paycheck, your assets generate income while you sit back and relax, spend time with your family, and pursue your less lucrative passions.

Passive income exists, at least from a tax standpoint. Income from a rental property or from a partnership where you aren’t actively involved is considered passive income. The IRS treats this type of passive income differently than other income, even if that income comes in the form of dividends from an investment portfolio, what some might also call “passive income.” The truth is that all income requires active involvement, but perhaps it’s a matter of degree.

The IRS considers income from real estate investments passive income, but managing real estate can be a full-time job. Don’t expect to sit back and your investments to thrive, even if you have a management company handling the day-to-day work. In fact, unless you’re able to amass a significant volume of real estate, or if you do most of the work yourself, it’s unlikely the time and effort you spend will be as profitable as you expect.

Expect the same disappointment if you’re looking to dividend income as your path to wealth. If you calculate that you would like to replace $50,000 of your toil-based income, you would need to have $1 million invested in investments paying a 5 percent dividend. (I’m ignoring the difference in income tax just to keep the example simple.) $1 million is a large bank balance, but it is achievable. You can’t, however, just put $1 million in an investment paying a 5 percent dividend and forget about it.

Any investment requires active involvement, starting from the beginning. You need to choose the right investments to start, and you need to monitor your investments over time. Sure, you’re not toiling in the field or wiping sweat off your brow at a construction site, but you are spending time researching your investments. You also need to pay attention to ensure your investments continue to perform. Companies decide to cancel their dividends without so much of a warning, so you should follow the company’s financials to be aware of any signs of trouble before the executives decide to reinvest profits, if any, rather than continue the distribution to shareholders.

When it comes to letting your money earn your income, nothing beats bonds. Suze Orman and financial planners offer advice to the general public, extolling the virtues of investing in a portfolio made almost entirely of stocks, but if you look at Suze’s own portfolio, which is designed not to increase value over time in exchange for risk but to generate income year after year, she invests primarily in bonds. (Her investment was in bonds as of a few years ago according to her own admission in a news story. I don’t know whether this is still the case, but it’s likely.)

Taking a step back, while Suze — and many other investors, but she is a good example — invests her portfolio for passive income, she’s not sitting back and relaxing with her life. While she may have money managers who handle her investments for her, she still trades her time and effort for an income.

Are you seeking the Holy Grail of passive income?

Photo: Raido Kaldma
Wealthy Turtle

{ 10 comments }

Podcast 159: The 7% Solution

This article was written by in Podcast. Add a comment.

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Jay Frosting speaks with John Graves, author of The 7% Solution: You Can Afford a Comfortable Retirement.

They discuss the unique challenges baby boomers face when planning for retirement.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast
The 7% Solution: S07E03 / 159

DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents

[00:00] Introduction from Jay Frosting
[00:33] Interview with John Graves
[00:44] The four money lessons baby boomers probably already know
[03:08] 40% of people close to retirement aren’t prepared
[04:19] Make the most of your last years of work and put off Social Security income
[06:12] Look at income sources aside from a typical salary
[07:11] Managing your own portfolio vs. using a financial advisor
[10:34] How to research stocks and be a value investor
[14:21] This system isn’t right for everybody
[15:34] Health is more important than wealth
[17:35] Giving back through volunteer work
[18:17] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

Theme music by Mindcube.

{ 0 comments }

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Bryan J Busch talks with Patrick van der Voorst, founder of ValueMyStuff, and Tom Dziubek speaks with Ralph Pinto from Chase about their participation in the Drive to End Hunger campaign.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast
ValueMyStuff / Chase Double the Difference: S06E21 / 178 and 168

DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents

Consumerism Commentary Podcast[00:00] Introduction from Bryan J Busch
[00:41] Interview with Patrick van der Voorst
[00:55] How ValueMyStuff works
[01:44] What are people asking for values of?
[02:23] People appraise things for selling and insurance
[03:04] Why art is considered an investment
[04:54] Comparing other investments to precious metals
[05:36] Patrick’s predictions for values going up
[07:24] Why certain items lose value overnight
[08:58] Valuable works of art as part of a retirement portfolio
[10:34] Older computers and iPods are now collectors’ items
[11:33] How to get the best estimate at ValueMyStuff.com
[13:17] Interview with Ralph Pinto
[13:26] Chase’s Drive to End Hunger Campaign with AARP Visa Card
[15:19] Older Americans and food insecurity
[16:05] Success of the AARP Visa Card campaign
[17:07] Chase’s involvement and components
[18:45] Why older Americans donate more to charity
[19:42] Signing up for the AARP Visa Card
[20:28] Making donations directly to the campaign
[21:02] Partnership with AARP and NASCAR
[21:56] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

Theme music by Mindcube.

{ 1 comment }

This isn’t the first time smart professional investors have considered abandoning the buy-and-hold strategy. Most of the controversy has surfaced following the recession. I asked whether buy-and-hold was still a good investing strategy a few years ago. Investors who had been following the buy and hold strategy — forgoing active trading in favor of buying stocks for the long term and sticking with a philosophy of patience — saw the values of their stock-heavy portfolios plummet, following the stock market at large.

This kind of catastrophe shocks investors to the core and gives people a chance to challenge their assumptions and choices. The leading argument against the buy and hold strategy for investors going forward focuses on volatility. Judging from market performance through and after the recession, stocks seem to be riskier than they have been in the past. Some investors believe that the fundamentals that made buying and holding stocks for the long term work in the past, providing an 8% average annual return over 30 year periods, have changed.

DollarsMarkets are more volatile now because the bulk of investing activity isn’t done by humans making purchasing and selling decisions based on available information, most trading is accomplished by computers reacting to market changes in microseconds. Complex investing instruments like derivatives and hedge funds make it possible to take advantage of economic situations generally inaccessible via stocks.

In an interview with CNN Money, economist Andrew Low has this to say about buy-and-hold:

Buy-and-hold doesn’t work anymore. The volatility is too significant. Almost any asset can suddenly become much more risky. Buying into a mutual fund and holding it for 10 years is no longer going to deliver the same kind of expected return that we saw over the course of the last seven decades, simply because of the nature of financial markets and how complex it’s gotten.

Think about how that person earned 4%. He lost 30%, saw a big bounce-back, and so on, and the compound rate of return over the period was 4%. But most investors did not wait for the dust to settle. After the first 25% loss, they probably reduced their holdings, and only got part way back in after the market somewhat recovered.

His argument is that buy-and-hold doesn’t work because investors don’t follow the guidelines of the strategy. Carl Richards pointed out in his recent book, The Behavior Gap, that investor’s actual returns don’t match “investment returns” because people are human and react like humans. When they do react, the often do so improperly, like reacting to a high-flying stock by buying at a high price and selling when the market sinks the stock’s value. If buy-and-hold doesn’t work, it’s not a failure of the strategy, it investors’ failure to properly follow the strategy thanks to their human brains.

Do you plan to use a buy-and-hold strategy for your investments in the future, and do you expect the long-term returns in the stock market we’ve seen over the last century continue in the future?

CNN Money

{ 16 comments }

Podcast 150: The Big Retirement Risk

by Flexo

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Bryan J Busch talks with Erin Botsford, author of The Big Retirement Risk. They discuss myths that Wall Street perpetuates about itself and Erin’s plan for a more sensible retirement portfolio. Consumerism Commentary Podcast The Big Retirement Risk: S06E20 / 150 Download – RSS – iTunes Table of contents ... Continue reading this article…

0 comments Read the full article →

High I.Q. Scores Correlate to Better Investments

by Flexo
Brain

In Finland, all young men are required to spend some time in the military. Finland also has a wealth tax, requiring citizens to report their investments to the government. As a result, researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, Aalto University, and the University of Chicago have discovered data worth studying. Because all military ... Continue reading this article…

16 comments Read the full article →

Harry Browne’s Permanent Portfolio

by Jacob

This is a guest article by Jacob, creator of the personal finance blog, My Personal Finance Journey. In the article, Jacob analyzes the Permanent Portfolio, a theory presented by Harry Browne, to determine whether investing along the theory’s guidelines can help investors beat the stock market. Investors in general always seem to be on the ... Continue reading this article…

20 comments Read the full article →

Buying a House With Cold, Hard Cash

by Flexo
Cash

When I write about the unbanked, the vast majority of this category of consumer avoids the financial industry due to lack of trust in the industry or a belief that living paycheck to paycheck doesn’t necessitate the fees and hassles of including a third party in financial transactions. Cash, in some respects, keeps you off ... Continue reading this article…

29 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 2812345···Last »