As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: pricing

Buy Airfare Six Weeks in Advance

This article was written by in Travel. 20 comments.

Airlines Reporting Corporation (ARC), a company that processes airline transactions for travel agents and consumers, has analyzed 144 million transactions for domestic flights in 2011 to better understand airlines’ pricing schemes. The study found the lowest fares were available six weeks in advance of the departure date.

I’ve always been under the impression that the earlier you can purchase tickets for a flight, the better, but buying far in advance does not seem to be the best option when looking at the data. The study makes the case for planning ahead, but not too far in advance. The data also show that waiting until your departure date is just three weeks away can be financially damaging. Prices incline steeply once your departure date is three weeks away. The fare paid according to the study features another, steeper increase seven days before travel date.

AirplaneCustomers who purchased their airline tickets six weeks in advance received an average discount of about 6 percent off the average fare paid for that flight.

Not everyone has the luxury of planning six weeks in advance for a trip. Businesses often need to respond to changing travel needs, and are more likely to pay higher prices for a flight than a family planning a vacation.

I purchased tickets to my most recent round-trip flight, traveling from the east coast to the west coast for Thanksgiving, only seven days in advance. The flight cost $419 including all taxes and fees. It wasn’t the most expensive fare I’ve paid for this type of trip, and there was at least one slightly less expensive option available if I were willing to fly at an inconvenient time.

I haven’t done a great job of planning in advance. It could pay off to know where I will want to go six weeks in the future. I’ll try to keep that in mind if I intend to travel this spring. How far in advance to you plan your travel?

ARC [pdf]

{ 20 comments }

Weekend Reading

This article was written by in Link Sharing. 6 comments.

Here are a few articles I’ve spotted recently.

Are you superstitious? Superstitions can extend into your finances; the belief that the stock market’s performance on January 1 signals the performance for the entire year can be classified as a superstition. Frugal Zeitgeist offers a compilations of several superstitions and their origins.

I’m a customer of Amazon.com’s Prime service. It provides free two-day shipping on all items, not just those priced at $25 and above. A myth is circulating that Amazon Prime members are shown higher priced items by default, resulting in these customers spending more money than those without Amazon Prime. Money Beagle debunks the Amazon Prime myth.

Get Rich Slowly offers advice on fending off financial trolls. It seems like there are always some people who insist on attempting to sabotage your ideas, your reputation, or your finances. I like the way J.D. presented the idea that we have internal trolls, as well. Sometimes we must battle ourselves.

Krantcents explains how access to information and entertainment is ubiquitous.

My choices for the best credit cards in 2012 and thoughts on industry trends for the year was included in the latest Carnival of Personal Finance at Wealth Pilgrim. If you’re a blogger interested in hosting the Carnival, find out more here.

With the results of a customer satisfaction survey, Insure.com has developed a tool that lets you browse insurance companies to determine how they compare with each other from the customers’ perspective. The companies are rated on a five-star scale among several different criteria, including claims processing, customer service, and value. The tools covers auto, home, life and health insurance.

{ 6 comments }

Last week I met with a Certified Financial Planner for the first time. This was a free service provided by Vanguard, so it was a good opportunity to speak to a professional about my specific situation. For many years, I’ve been relying on mostly generalized advice, whether from books, large communities like the Motley Fool discussion forums (particularly the Living Below Your Means section), financial columnists, or a community of bloggers that has grown from fewer than a dozen to more than a thousand.

My financial planner and I started by discussing my goals. This was tough for me, as I’ve changed my long-term goals several times in the last decade. I’m trying to find the right mission for my life. I’ve made personal finance my passion since the creation of Consumerism Commentary in 2003, but long before that date I was passionate about other aspects of my life. I need to look at how I want to spend the next twenty, thirty, or forty years of my life and some of the more important developments along the way, like having a family.

From a financial standpoint, my next major expenditure will most likely be a house, though that purchase relies on making other choices in my life first.

With my current level of investable net worth — my assets outside of an emergency fund and money put aside for shorter-term goals like a house — I’m willing to give up potential returns in the stock market for less risk. We decided on a mix between 60% stocks and 40% bonds. Complicating the issue is the fact that almost all of my non-cash investments are in stocks. It will be important to look at my portfolio as a whole rather than analyzing my 401(k) separately from my IRA and separately from my taxable account. This is where tools like Quicken, offering charting and reporting across a variety of accounts regardless of where they are held, come in handy.

The 60%/40% split between stock funds and bond funds is more conservative than I would generally recommend for someone my age (thirty-five), but that might be appropriate based on my lower needs for long-term returns and need for maintaining value in the intermediate term as I determine the next steps for my life.

Before discussing specific investments, I made sure the planner was aware that I prefer index mutual funds rather than ETFs, managed mutual funds, or individual investments. The planner suggested that 70% of the stock portion of my portfolio be invested in the Total Stock Market Index with the remaining 30% in the International Stock Market Index. Half of the bond portion of the portfolio should be invested in the Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond Fund with the other half in the New Jersey Tax-Exempt Municipal Bond Fund. I’m not sure how excited I am about the prospect of investing in New Jersey, but the tax advantage could be helpful.

I brought up the issue of tax efficiency. It was my understanding that tax-efficient investments, such as the bond funds recommended, should be invested in taxable accounts, while investments that did not offer any tax advantages should be invested in retirement plans like 401(k)s and traditional IRAs, where the tax is deferred until retirement. After analyzing my tax situation, the planner concluded the opposite would be true, admitting the idea seemed counter-intuitive. In today’s environment, the tax rate for qualified dividends, the result of stock-based mutual funds, is 15%, while income from bond-based mutual funds is taxed at ordinary income rates.

However, the bond funds he suggested to are federally tax-exempt, and one is also state tax-exempt as long as I continue living in New Jersey. The adviser’s suggestion to invest in bonds in my tax-deferred retirement accounts might make more sense if those investments were not tax-exempt. I think there’s a piece of discussion missing from my notes that might have explained this situation with a more satisfying rationale. I’ll seek a second opinion about this particular aspect of my planning.

With most of my portfolio in cash, the planner suggested moving these funds to stocks and bonds slowly, over the course of eight quarters. Leaving behind any amount I’d like to have let in cash at the end of two years, I would divide the remainder by eight to determine my quarterly investment amount. This method of dollar-cost averaging could ease the pricing risk inherent in investing a lump sum.

If my goal is only to have money for retirement, my time horizon would be long. Again, I’ll need to define some of my life goals to determine time horizons for specific pools of assets. That would be a topic for a later discussion.

In summary, these are the main points of our discussion:

  • Six months to one year of living needs in cash, including an emergency fund and any other spending needs.
  • With the rest, a 60%/40% split between stock funds and bond funds.
  • Using a dollar-cost averaging investing strategy over the next eight quarters for current funds.
  • Add the bond fund portion to 401(k) investments and stock fund portion to taxable investments.

What do you think of this strategy?

{ 27 comments }

This is a guest article by Investor Junkie, focusing on alternative investments. This is a broad topic, so this article functions as a brief overview. There are many ideas within that deserve deeper explanation, something I’ll consider for future articles here.

Market turmoil is all around us. Last week, the 10-year US Treasury bond went below an unheard-of yield of 2%. Recently, the Federal Reserve formally announced that it will be keeping the Fed funds rate between 0% and 0.25% at least until June 2013. Savers are being punished, and traditional fixed income investments are yielding nothing. Investing for yield in this environment is very difficult. Where is one to turn to get some yield when a 5 year CD yields less than 3%?

In addition, inflation is expected to be around 3% this year, so any investment that yields less than this you are losing money in real terms. What are your options in this low yield environment? You do have no choice but to go up the yield curve. I won’t lie; some alternatives are risker than fixed income traditional fixed-income investments, though most have a low probability of default and generate much higher returns than government-secured investments. One could argue investments yielding less than the expected inflation rate is a risker investment. I would personally rather hold my money under my mattress than investing in a 10-year treasury bond.

Tokyo Stock Exchange InvestingThat being said, what are the options? Some are traditional investments, and others are alternative investments that you may have not considered previously.

  • Peer-to-peer lending
  • High-yield corporate bonds
  • Ginnie Mae bonds
  • I-Bonds
  • Municipal bonds
  • High dividend stocks
  • REITs
  • Master limited partnerships

Here is a brief summary of each of these.

Peer-to-peer lending

I’ve been investing with the peer-to-peer lending (P2P) service Lending Club for over two years. To see my process, read my Lending Club review for the details. So far I’m very happy with my 11.49% net annualized return. Peer-to-peer investing isn’t perfect though, and it is still a very new investment class. It has potential to be a viable alternative to high-yield corporate bonds, with possibly less risk. If we do see another recession, it’s possible P2P loans will default more frequently, and increased defaults will decrease investment returns.

High-yield corporate bonds

High-yield corporate bonds, otherwise known as junk bonds, offer higher yields than traditional government bonds and can be 3% to 4% higher than government fixed-income investments. Of course, the higher yields come with higher risk and have a higher chance of default. Unless you are investing six figures, you are best to diversify in this category via mutual funds or ETFs focused on these investments rather than buying individual junk bonds.

Ginnie Mae bonds

Ginnie Mae bonds are federally-backed bonds that offer higher rates than traditional government treasuries. With Ginnie Mae bonds it is often best to invest via mutual funds only because most investors will not have the capital requirements to buy directly. I discuss about Ginnie Mae investing in more detail on my blog.

I-Bonds

I’m a big fan of U.S. I-Bonds, and for the next 11 months these investments offer at least a 2.51% annualized return. That rate could be even higher depending upon the CPI calculation in October. Like government TIPS, I-Bonds follow the inflation rate. There are no state taxes to pay on interest. Federal taxes are only paid when you cash out unless the bonds are used to pay for higher education, in which case they are tax-free. Unfortunately savings bonds have an annual purchase limit, and the U.S. Treasury Department just announced an end to paper-based savings bonds. Next year, the maximum you can invest is $5,000 per Social Security number.

Municipal bonds

For higher-income individuals, muni bonds offer a decent after-tax return with a historically low chance of default. Unless you are investing six or more figures you are best to diversify via a mutual fund. Muni bonds typically offer 2% to 3% higher returns than federal government investments. The primary advantage to muni bonds is the lack of capital gain taxes, though in this low fixed-income environment, individuals in lower tax brackets might want to consider them as an investment.

Dividend stocks

Many dividend stocks have a higher return than government treasuries. You also have the added benefit of the stock possibly increasing in price over time. There are dividend ETFs that can diversify your investment. I personally like the dividend aristocrats, which have increased their dividends every year for at least the past 25 years. These might be considered boring stocks, but they typically offer decent returns for the long haul.

REITs

Real Estate Investment Trusts (otherwise known as REITs) are publicly-traded real estate companies. You can invest directly in a specific REIT or via a mutual fund or ETF. With the decline in commercial real estate prices, it might be a good time to get back into specific real estate sectors, and these investments have an almost inverse correlation to stocks. Traditionally REITs have offered a stable 6% to 7% return. REITs are typically best held in tax-deferred accounts because the investor’s profits are generally considered ordinary income rather than capital gains.

Master limited partnerships

This is one of the rarely-discussed investments that generates a consistently high yield, and low to payout in taxes. Master limited partnerships (MLPs) are similar to real estate trusts, but are usually best to invest in taxable accounts. Most MLPs are companies related to the transporting of commodities, such as natural gas and oil pipelines. Typically, their pricing is not related to price of the commodity itself, but based upon the transportation of that commodity. If you do your taxes yourself it might not be a good option to invest your taxable money. MLPs can be complex when filing your personal tax return. I discuss more about MLPs in detail on my blog.

To diversify your risk, one could invest in many of these above investments, and still yield a decent return that’s stable. This article is meant as a summary of possible investment options than can generate some yield. Please do more research before investing any of the above options. With any investment you should always determine your risk, and if unsure contact a professional. In case you didn’t know, all investments have risks. Past performance does not guarantee future returns.

How are you investing in this low yield environment?

tenaciousme

{ 13 comments }

Taxing Wall Street Transactions

by Flexo

We pay a sales tax on most products we buy, so why isn’t there a tax when you buy stocks and bonds? In the United Kingdom, a tax on stock purchases raises four billion pounds annually. It’s hard to estimate how much revenue a tax on financial transactions would generate in the United States, but ... Continue reading this article…

12 comments Read the full article →

United MileagePlus Explorer Card Review

by Flexo

Air travel used to be seen as a luxury, but those days are long gone. If flying was ever fun and convenient, it’s not anymore. My last flight from California, a trip to visit family, was plagued with delays and inconveniences. It was a good thing the flight was delayed; otherwise, I might have missed ... Continue reading this article…

5 comments Read the full article →

Netflix Increases Subscription Price for Some Customers

by Flexo

My Facebook feed exploded the other day with news that Netflix was changing its pricing scheme. For some customers, those who subscribe to unlimited streaming and DVD plans, the new price would be a 50 percent increase. I subscribe to Netflix. A few months ago I re-instated my account to take advantage of the streaming-only option ... Continue reading this article…

37 comments Read the full article →

Capital One Buys ING Direct, Now What?

by Flexo

ING Direct has been on sale for the past few years, and I’ve speculated on the rumors of possible buyers like Ally Bank and GE Capital. The winning bidder has been announced. Capital One has purchased ING Direct for $9 billion. Capital One is a financial institution that is historically known as a credit card ... Continue reading this article…

57 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 712345···Last »