As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: recovery

This is a guest article by Emily Guy Birken, author of The SAHMambulust. In this article, Emily explains and reviews the 3/50 Project, a movement designed to boost local economies.

The presents have been given out, the wrapping paper has been cleaned up, and Black Friday, Cyber Monday, and Small Business Saturday from American Express are just distant memories. Now may not be when most people are thinking about shopping, but it’s the perfect opportunity to commit to really help small businesses in your area for 2012. And what do small businesses need more than anything else? Loyal customers.

This is the basis of The 3/50 Project, spearheaded by Cinda Baxter, a retail consultant, professional speaker, and former retail business owner. Back in 2009, after hearing several reports about how patronizing local brick-and-mortar stores could help the economy, Cinda wrote about the achievability of economic recovery if we all simply commit to being good customers to independent retailers.

BakeryFrom that blog post, a movement was born.

The idea is very simple. Pick three local, independently owned businesses in your area — businesses that you would be sad to see shut their doors — and plan on spending $50 total per month among those three businesses. That’s it. The movement does not ask you to spend more than you already do. Just plan on $50 of your monthly expenditures going toward local businesses.

It is important to note that sometimes you will end up spending a little more money by purchasing locally rather than at the neighborhood box store or online. However, paying above bargain-basement prices means that you are also helping your local economy — a fairly easy trade-off in most budgets.

What’s exciting about making this commitment is the fact that it could contribute to our financial recovery. According to the statistics provided by The 3/50 Project website, every $100 spent in local brick-and-mortars results in “$68 return[ed] to the community through taxes, payroll, and other expenditures. If you spend that in a national chain, only $43 stays [local]. Spend it online, and nothing comes home.” Imagine the boom to the economy if everyone simply chose to spend some of their money locally.

The 3/50 Project is specific in how it defines an independent business. Though a franchised store may have a local owner, it is not one of the local businesses that The 3/50 Project is aiming to help. As a franchisee, the owner of a fast food restaurant, for example, can benefit from national ad campaigns, preferred vendor lists and large-scale price negotiations. This project is looking to help the independents who are relying on their own unique brand, pay their own expenses for marketing, rent and other operating costs, and operate from a storefront, rather than their home, a kiosk, or the internet. The full description of what constitutes an independent retailer is available here.

Deciding to try The 3/50 Project in your community does not mean that you have to give up your Starbucks coffee or your cheap groceries at Wal-Mart. There is room for national chains, internet shopping, and local stores in your commitment. This is an opportunity to be mindful about your spending, which should always be a goal of responsible personal finance. Why not help your local economy while you’re making savvy spending decisions?

Photo: Calgary Reviews
3/50 Project

{ 9 comments }

A new analysis of household income reveals some statistics that might be counter-intuitive. The study, authored by former Census Bureau economists Gordon W. Green Jr. and John F. Coder and published by Sentier Research, shows that median income for Americans has decreased more sharply during the economic recovery than during the recession.

The survey that presented these results focuses on monthly income data, which the study’s authors believe are more accurate than the popular annual data. The monthly data is more recent, helping to contribute to more potentially accurate results. Also, the annual data is subject to a “telescoping” effect, wherein respondents are more likely unable to correctly identify the timing of financial changes.

When the recession began in December 2007, the median salary was $55,309. This figure was down to $49,909 by June 2011, the most recent period with monthly data available.

It’s always interesting to look at data reflecting the economy as a whole, but most of the time, the only data points that matter are the specific conditions that affect your household. While the economy is slowing down, if a family has been able to increase income through negotiation, a strategic carer move, excellent performance, or picking up extra work on the side, the overall economy’s failure doesn’t matter.

It’s probably because I’m paying more attention now, but it seems like the economy is a significantly bigger piece of the news cycle than it ever has been. The economy has been the primary issue for politicians as well, replacing war and social issues. As someone who writes about personal finances, I can’t complain about this trend, but I often need to remind myself that macroeconomic issues aren’t that connected to people’s day-to-day experiences. It does trickle down. For example, the economy suffers and the financial industry suffers with it. With a sluggish industry, financial companies are less likely to hire or offer competitive salaries and benefits, protecting profits as much as possible for shareholders. Financial firms increase fees, fire customers, and make life difficult for employees.

At the individual level, these changes might not matter. I can move my money to an account that doesn’t charge fees. I can find a new job or find ways to supplement my income.

You can either be a victim of the economy or you can take control of your finances and increase your human capital so you can thrive regardless of the state of the economy.

Reuters, New York Times

{ 15 comments }

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast Tom Dziubek speaks with Gerri Detweiler, personal finance expert at Credit.com, about her series of articles dealing with underwater mortgages. Gerri goes into detail about each of the six options including home loan refinances & modifications, doing a short sale and declaring bankruptcy.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast #125
Underwater Mortgages: S05E21 / 149

DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents

Consumerism Commentary Podcast[00:00] Introduction from Tom Dziubek
[00:35] Interview with Gerri Detweiler
[00:46] The criteria for someone to be considered “underwater”
[02:19] Stay and pay
[04:43] Emergency home owner loans
[05:20] Refinancing a mortgage & the HARP program
[06:52] Home loan modification & the HAMP program
[09:16] The popularity of home modifications
[11:38] Short sales
[13:59] Cancellation of debt and its affect on your income taxes
[16:21] Walking away from a mortgage
[19:59] Declaring bankruptcy
[22:37] Misconceptions about bankruptcy
[23:43] Credit rating recovery after a bankruptcy
[27:20] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

Theme music by Mindcube.

{ 2 comments }

The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009, the 2009 economic stimulus bill, provided an opportunity for homeowners in trouble to qualify for mortgage modifications. The Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and the “Making Home Affordable” provided support for lenders who worked with homeowners.

Part of the requirement for qualifying for the modification program is for borrowers to have missed a number of payments. This put homeowners who could benefit from the program, in trouble but not yet delinquent, in a tough position. They would need to skip payments, even if they could pay, ruining their credit in the process. In addition, lenders made it difficult to qualify, with understaffed departments handling the cases, a lack of communication, mixed messages from customer service, and overall disorganization.

Mortgage RefinanceA more pressing problem with HAMP was that borrowers were required to owe less than 125% of a home’s value — and in a tough market where home values were falling, it was much easier for a homeowner to find himself in that position — and to have a high credit score.

Without HAMP delivering the desired effect, the Obama administration is looking at improving the concept as a part of the latest economic stimulus package. A third round of quantitative easing is unlikely to gain wide support, at least not in that form, so the federal government is looking for ways to reduce the risk of a second recession, a double-dip recession, or any other type of economic problem.

The Obama administration is seeking feedback on a new round of stimulus designed to help more homeowners qualify for a mortgage refinance. After a decade of lax lending standards, following the recession and credit crunch they have tightened, making it difficult for consumer with marginal credit histories — or even something not too out of the ordinary, like self-employment income without W2 income — to qualify. The new program will seek to allow more homeowners to refinance at a time when mortgage interest rates are very low.

Another aspect of this program would take federally-owned housing and convert the buildings into rentals, turning them over to investment firms to manage.

The plan could actually help pay down the deficit, as there are unspent funds that have been set aside for stimulus:

The idea is appealing because it would not necessarily require Congressional action. It also would not tap any of the $45.6 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Funds that was set aside to help struggling homeowners. Only $22.9 billion of that pool has been spent or pledged so far, and fewer than 1.7 million loans have been modified under federal programs. But Andrea Risotto, a Treasury spokeswoman, said whatever was left would be used to reduce the federal deficit.

Photo: Tom Hilton
New York Times

{ 12 comments }

Credit Market Improving, Will Economy Follow?

by Flexo

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York released their quarterly evaluation of the credit markets, and they are reporting some good news for consumers. Total consumer debt dropped $50 billion since last quarter, ending at $11.4 trillion on June 30. Mortgage balances and home equity credit balances declined, contributing to the overall decrease. Debt not ... Continue reading this article…

7 comments Read the full article →

Warren Buffett Doesn’t Want to Be Coddled

by Flexo
Warren Buffett Coddle

Update: The concepts implied by Warren Buffett have formed the basis of President Obama’s Buffett Rule proposal. Warren Buffett is staying in the news. I wrote recently about his desire to continue investing in stocks during market volatility, and today he published an opinion piece in the New York Times. He laid out the facts ... Continue reading this article…

22 comments Read the full article →

A Housing Market Recovery in the Distant Future?

by Flexo

Several times over the past few years, I’ve asked myself whether I should take advantage of the lower prices for real estate, put my renting history to rest, and buy a house. I’ve brought up the topic several times on Consumerism Commentary, as well. Every time the news media comes out with another wave of ... Continue reading this article…

21 comments Read the full article →

Podcast 101: The Squeaky Wheel, Guy Winch

by Flexo

Today’s guest on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast is Dr. Guy Winch, author of The Squeaky Wheel: Complaining the Right Way to Get Results, Improve Your Relationships and Enhance Self-Esteem. Guy received his doctorate in clinical psychology from New York University in 1991 and completed a postdoctoral fellowship in family and couples therapy at NYU Medical ... Continue reading this article…

4 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 912345···Last »