As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: restraint

This is a guest article by Greg McFarlane, the author of Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense, a financial primer for people in their twenties and thirties who know nothing about money.

People have feared inflation ever since… well, since the dollar’s last rampant bout of inflation in 1977. However, there’s every reason to believe that this time inflationary pressures are too overwhelming to discount. Or two colossal reasons, at least:

1. Legislative and executive leaders of the federal government, for whom fiscal restraint is a dirty term. No matter how laudable their objectives, they propose to spend and borrow an ungodly amount to achieve them. Any non-politician reading this blog knows the term “regardless of cost” can never be taken literally, but our elected betters think otherwise and aren’t concerned about the inevitable results.

2. A federal funds rate that resembles Carlos Pena’s batting average, or Countdown with Keith Olbermann’s Nielsen ratings. Here’s a really quick primer, because a lot of people act like they know this stuff but don’t:

The Fed (Federal Reserve) is the nation’s central bank. It actually creates our money out of thin air, which it sells to the federal government to conduct its business with. Commercial and investment banks like Chase and Wachovia also borrow from the Fed. The interest rate those banks pay is determined by the Fed and called the federal funds rate, which thus serves as a basis for just about every interest rate in the economy.

Most countries’ central banks set a single rate. The Fed instead sets a range — the more you borrow, the less you pay. This of course favors larger banks, although “favors larger banks” has been a relative term ever since the federal government confiscated $678 per United States citizen and gave lent it to AIG. Since December the range has been 0% to 0.25%, an all-time nadir. Inflation has kept pace, barely registering and keeping the dollar’s value intact while jobs disappear. The range eventually has to rise, since it can’t go in any other direction. Once it rises, in concert with the demand for additional dollars that government spending is creating, inflation should ensue.

What does this mean in practical terms? It means getting your assets the hell out of cash, or at least out of U.S. dollars.

The immediate temptation is to shop the world for the currencies the dollar will lose the most money against. There are candidates such as the New Zealand dollar and the CFA franc, but again, your investment will only then be as safe as that government’s fiscal conservatism.

One strategy that goes a step farther is to look at blue chip stocks that don’t trade in U.S. dollars. If the stock’s fundamentals are strong enough, it shouldn’t matter if it’s measured in Swedish kronor, Swiss francs, or almost any currency short of Zimbabwean dollars. Even if a localized bout of inflation causes the stock’s nominal price to artificially rise, its real price should remain consistently strong.

Here are some examples of giant corporations that don’t necessarily trade on the Big Board nor NASDAQ:

  • Royal Dutch Shell (which trades under the symbol RDSA on the London Exchange)
  • British Petroleum (BP, London)
  • Toyota (TYO, Tokyo)

Yes, Toyota. Exhale. And while extolling the benefits of a particular security might make the author come across as a boiler room stock promoter, I’m not telling you to buy anything. I’m telling you to look critically at the reasons for a stock’s atypical behavior.

If you think a recent week of questionable publicity in one market can turn the world’s largest and most respected automotive company into a bad investment, you shouldn’t be investing in anything more demanding than an index fund. A few months from now, no one will remember the recent uncomfortable performance that the parent company of two of Toyota’s major competitors forced the company to undertake.

Furthermore, this is a perfect time to go contrarian. Toyota shares have dropped 20% in the last month. Think about why that might happen to a stock.

  1. Is it a volatile small-cap? No, it trades at $71.
  2. Are its financials questionable? No, they’re healthy. Toyota made money last quarter after several quarters of losses. The company routinely buys back treasury stock, showing that on the investor relations side, it cares about preserving value.
  3. Did it suffer a one-time public relations hit, illustrated by unconvincing former customers telling stories of narrowly averted carnage and crying into the camera on cue? You can field that one.
  4. Gold is the traditional inflation hedge, but when you see an investment being sold during commercial breaks on general-interest TV shows, that opportunity has clearly evaporated. Besides, gold’s value has quadrupled in the last 8 years. That’s swell, but if you’re looking to preserve wealth, remember that time continues to move forward, not backward.

    What about Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, whose defensive strength is written right into their very name? These are a type of U.S. bond whose interest rate, as you can probably figure out, factors inflation in. TIPS are great in theory, as long as you can trust the government’s consumer price index numbers and you can trust the government’s ability to honor its debts. “Full faith and credit of the United States government” doesn’t mean quite the same now as it did when the phrase was coined.

{ 11 comments }

In my most recent debt update, I re-committed to spending a fixed amount of money on discretionary items during the week, instead of trusting my self-disciplined use of a credit card. I got $100.00 out of the ATM last Saturday, and the experiment began.

See, I’m still not sure if $100.00 per week is reasonable. It seems like it should be, but I was born in 1975, and humans seem to learn pretty early on how much a dollar is worth, after which it’s difficult to re-learn a new value. Some small part of me still has trouble paying more than $5.00 for a shirt, for example. I’m pretty sure that I’ve gone through periods in the past using “only” $100.00 a week, without any trouble, and it was a nice round number.

How’d I Do?

Ben Frankling StatueSo, now it’s Friday, how much do I have left? $35 and some change. (And it’s the change part that might be the worst of all. I hate carrying coins.)

The dangerous bit here is that the car is running low on gas, and I suspect I’ll have to fill up on the way home. The last time I filled up 11 days ago, it cost $22.65 (thanks for the info, Fuelly!), so I should plan on at least $25.00. That leaves about $10.00 until mid-day Saturday.

Did I Make Any Mistakes?

By Monday morning, I hadn’t spent any of the $100.00, and I was feeling cautiously optimistic. Of course, that also means I hadn’t done anything nice (anything nice that requires cash) for my wife over the weekend. I used to be in the habit at least of buying breakfast on Saturday or Sunday.

But on Monday, two big things happened, things that last week I would not have considered big. My teammates at work have a regular monthly lunch date, and we went to California Pizza Kitchen, which cost roughly $20.00 including a tip. But given that I still had pizza leftover for lunch the next day, it evened out to about $10.00 for two days, and that only happens once a month, anyway.

The other big thing is that I brought in some shirts for dry cleaning. I go through bouts of enjoying the feel of a starchy shirt, and here in Texas, you can’t wear long sleeves for at least six months of the year, so this won’t be a permanent problem. Fortunately, I took a chance on the Cleaner/Tailor that is the closest to our house, and because it’s a Mom & Pop (literally) business, they’re inexpensive and careful. They don’t lose buttons, they replace missing buttons. And the bill was twice as high this week because I brought in some slacks to get the frayed hems fixed, which cost $8.00 Some brief research online indicates that $10.00 is a normal price for that, and it’s certainly cheaper than buying new pants.

Sure, But What Did You Use Plastic For?

Ah, you know me too well. I’ve used my debit card for two things since I decided to go cash-only:

  • Before I went to the bank to use the ATM, I went to Walgreen’s, ’cause I thought they had a Chase ATM, but they didn’t, and I ended up buying two pints of ice cream for $3.98
  • On Wednesday night I needed to park downtown, and I didn’t trust the electronic meter very much, so I used another $3.00 on the debit card for that.

So if you remove that (rounding up) $7.00, I actually have $28.00 left, most of which will go toward gasoline later today.

All the Plastic, Dude

Okay, okay. I’ll check and see what got added to the problematic credit card since the experiment began on January 27th.

  • $17.99 went toward Usenet access. This is one of those regular, automatic charges that people tend to forget about. I don’t use that for as many things as I used to, certainly not $18 / month worth, and I’m making myself a to-do to re-evaluate that.
  • $30.00 to the DNC? I don’t recognize this, but it probably came from a commitment to make contributions until a particular law is passed. I’d still like to be able to do that, but as we can see, I can’t afford it. To-do #2.
  • Huh. This thing is saying I used the credit card for $12.32 at Chik-Fil-A on Monday. Even if the transaction date is off by a day or two, this is still troubling because I don’t remember going to Chik-Fil-A. $12.32 looks like two people’s worth. Maybe my wife will remember this? Regardless, I’m wondering if maybe I just used the credit card accidentally out of habit. I’ll put it in a different place in my wallet, and the resulting confusion should remind me not to use it.
  • I spent $2.99 on an episode of Leverage through iTunes (man, that’s a great show). Officially, this should come out of our joint account. I should create a spreadsheet to keep a tally of joint expenses that go on my credit card. It won’t add up to much, I don’t think, but just to be safe.
  • I also spent $0.99 on the song “Swinging on a Star” (the one from the “Hudson Hawk” soundtrack, of course). Before I re-committed, I was spending a lot on music, especially movie soundtracks. On the list of areas where I need to exercise more restraint, music purchases is definitely in the top three.
  • I made a regular, automatic $5.00 donation to the producer of some of my favorite podcasts. I don’t want to stop making this donation, because I want to think that someday I can also make a living that way. Maybe I should just switch it to my bank debit card? What do you think?
  • And the pending payment from today: $40.00 for tolls. I don’t know what to do about this. I like the tollway, it makes my commute a good 15 minutes faster. How much more would I be spending on gas if I took surface roads? I don’t know.

What Does the Future Hold?

Clearly, I didn’t make it through the week spending only $100.00. Compared to previous months, I made huge strides forward, but I didn’t meet my goal. It probably seems worse, because the month rolled over in the middle of the first week and several automatic monthly payments were made, totaling about $93.00. Assuming there aren’t more of these at other times of the month, that’s $23.25 per week that I wasn’t accounting for. I think I can get rid of most everything except the tolls.

Is there anything else I forgot to look at, or consider changing?

Credit Card Debt Totals
Legacy Debt $964.71
Newer Debt $4,736.66

Photo credit: Tony the Misfit.

{ 10 comments }

Knight Kiplinger is the editor in chief of Kiplinger’s Personal Finance magazine and Kiplinger.com, and in the November issue, he has published an editorial that gets to the core of what must be done to adapt to today’s economic reality. A link to the online edition of the article was sent to me by a publicity agent, but despite thism I wanted to share it with readers.

Kiplinger, the individual, has nothing to lose by making bold statements about the economy, unlike our presidential candidates who have to worry about alienating voters. The editor in chief does report to the board of directors of the publishing company, so I’m sure he couldn’t fly too far off the handle. Appropriately, the editorial is fitting the rest of the publication.

First, he lists America’s eight toughest economic problems, summarized here:

  1. Overconsumption and undersaving by individuals and the federal government
  2. Soaring old-age entitlements
  3. Addiction to fossil fuels
  4. Dependence on imported oil
  5. An overly ambitious foreign policy of promoting democracy by forcible regime change
  6. Failing public schools and inadequate vocational training
  7. Uneven access to health care
  8. A broken immigration system

Kiplinger goes on to provide solutions, both governmental and private, for these issues. Some of these solutions may be controversial. For example. here’s what the article proposes to reduce federal spending.

Voters should insist that Congress begin reducing the federal budget deficit, starting first with spending restraint. Tax hikes could come later–but only if proved to be needed.

My nominees for frozen or gradually reduced federal spending: military hardware; a wide array of subsidies to business, especially energy and agriculture; and health care for the elderly and poor (not less care, but more efficiently delivered).

My candidates for higher federal spending: support for elementary and secondary education, basic scientific research, and infrastructure (bridges, airports, harbors and parks).

The article contains a number of interesting suggestions for improving the economy and the quality of living in the United States. Read the article, A New Economic Agenda.

{ 10 comments }

Toys for Lunch

This article was written by in Uncategorized. 6 comments.

I have a confession to make.

My name is Sasha, and I’ve spent the last five years completely opposed to bringing my lunch to work. Diametrically opposed, in fact. I’d shudder when my favorite frugal bloggers brought it up, shifting to the next topic as quickly as I could.

“Yes,” I’d think to myself, “I know I’m spending $10-$12 per day on lunch alone, not to mention those $3 muffins I occasionally fall prey to in the morning. Yes, I know it must cost me an insane amount of money per year. But I don’t care because I can’t spare the time to deal with the headache of bringing lunch. I’m organized, but too busy to be that organized.”

And on I went, repeating my daily lunch mantra, scoffing at the unsexy brown lunch bags people pulled, half-frozen, from our cramped little minifridge at work as I wandered off in search of something more exciting — namely, the same exact salad I’d buy almost every day from the place around the corner, then devour over my keyboard. Yep, most of the time, my lunch was downright thrilling.

I have another confession to make, however. I’ve changed.

For the past three weeks, I’ve been bringing my salads myself. In spite of vowing never to do this again after excavating my precious organic baby lettuces from the minifridge only to find each leaf encased in ice, here I am, toting in my haute cuisine.

Why the change? I’m a huge fan of gadgets, and recently discovered some toys just cool enough that I’m willing to spare the time to load them up each evening.

It started with this:

Fit and Fresh Salad ShakerFit & Fresh Salad Shaker

When I turned the corner in the supermarket and spied this item, I knew I had to have it, but at around $10, I picked it up and put it down again a few times before taking the leap. It’s big enough for a filling lunch salad, my utensils are included with the lid so I don’t have to mooch from my coworker’s stash, and, best of all, there’s a cute little separate dressing chamber that deploys — and I do mean deploys — itself into your salad with the twist of a dial. It’s so amusing that I’ve demonstrated it for several coworkers already. There’s a specially-sized ice pack which sits under the cover, so I can keep this in my tote till lunch without ever again experiencing Ice Age lettuce. I’m sold, and I now spend my lunches feasting on nice, organic farmers market salads.

Breakfast on the GoThe, company, Fit & Fresh, also makes a cute chilled sandwich container which features separate compartments for bread, filling and condiments to keep things fresh and unsoggy, and best of all, a breakfast kit which holds cereal, milk (within a chilled ice ring) fruit and even a spoon. To me it seems a truly decadent, not to mention inexpensive option to have a big bowl of cereal with fruit at my desk in the morning.

These containers aren’t the cheapest options, certainly, but to me the fun factor is worth it and I like the reusability aspect, replacing disposable containers or utensils.

Mr. Bento
Come to think of it, a bento box-type setup like the Mr. Bento by Zojirushi with separate little microwaveable dishes in an insulated container would be pretty cool, too, albeit more pricey. There’s even a version pour les femmes, known as Ms. Bento.

MySigg
And lest one’s beverage become boring in comparison, there’s My SIGG, a series of wildly customizable reusable aluminum water bottles, meant to be an eco- and budget- friendly alternative to disposable bottled water. Well, once one gets past the initial $20-something expense, that is.

I now realize it could end up costing me quite a lot to save money by bringing my lunch, but as long as I exercise some restraint, I should still be better off than I was buying my bodega salads. Personally, I prefer to invest in a few fun, reusable basics rather than a stockpile of disposable items, but I’m entertained by the range of options overall, from that crumpled brown bag and tin-foiled turkey club on up.

Do you have any fun lunch accessories to share? What works best for you?

{ 6 comments }

10 Money Tips for Baby Preparation

by Flexo

Looking forward to that new baby smell? It’ll cost you… for years. USA Today has ten tips for “baby-proofing” your finances — the way you might baby-proof a kitchen — so you’ll be in a better position to part with $1 million over the next 18 years. 1. Review health coverage. Some new parents I’ve ... Continue reading this article…

8 comments Read the full article →