As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: services

CitiBusiness ThankYou Card Review

This article was written by in Credit. 1 comment.


Citibank wants to lure more business owners away from American Express and Chase with a credit card that cribs from its competitors’ playbooks. Like the original Platinum Card, the CitiBusiness ThankYou Card streamlines expense reporting and adds significant purchase protection benefits. While its APR and rewards offers don’t stack up to Ink from Chase, strong service features could make the difference for professionals who don’t intend to carry a balance.

Small spending plateau triggers Citi’s signup bonus

According to Citi’s website, a new CitiBusiness ThankYou cardholder can trade their 15,000 bonus points for $150 in merchant gift cards after spending just $3,000 with the card over 90 days. New Chase Ink Cash members have to spend $5,000 to qualify for a bonus $150 cash rebate, but Chase also offers an extra $100 credit upon first purchase.

CitibankLike Chase, Citi offers its ThankYou members bonus points for purchases in a variety of rotating, seasonal categories. Qualifying purchases earn three ThankYou Points per dollar spent at eligible merchants that include computer stores, advertising companies, airlines, restaurants, and phone companies. You’ll earn one ThankYou Point for every dollar you spend elsewhere on the card. Citi also kicks in bonus rewards for managing your account online and registering for paperless statements.

Earning awards gets easier if you share your personal ThankYou balance

ThankYou points carry the most value when you redeem them for merchandise or for gift cards. For instance, at a penny per point, an Amazon.com gift card reward can let you earn the equivalent of a 3 percent rebate on featured category purchases. Because every employee using CitiBusiness cards earns points, your company’s balance can grow fast.

Chase and American Express both offer stronger redemption rates on their business rewards cards. However, Citi offers a feature that can make the ThankYou program more appealing. Carry both a CitiBusiness card and a personal Citi credit card, and the bank will let you swap points between your accounts at no charge. If you choose to keep all your points for yourself, merging your earnings can help you reach higher rewards levels faster.

Citi makes up for average account terms with extraordinary protection

At the moment, the CitiBusiness ThankYou Card offers a six month, no interest teaser, followed by an APR above 13 percent. There’s no balance transfer teaser in effect, either. With no annual fee and no charge for issuing employees their own cards, CitiBusiness makes a decent card for cash flow management. This card really shines for companies that take advantage of money-saving features, including:

  • Extended warranty. Add one year to the manufacturer’s standard warranty on each purchase.
  • Retail purchase protection. You’re covered for up to $10,000 in loss or damage for 90 days after each transaction.
  • Auto rental insurance. Never pay for a collision damage waiver again.
  • Travel accident insurance and assistance services. Automatic coverage, and a round-the-clock help desk to keep you safe.
  • While frequent flyers may prefer AmEx’s Platinum Card’s airport perks, the CitiBusiness ThankYou Card replicates many of its competitors’ most compelling benefits.

Personal Business Assistant

Concierge services have quickly become the must-have benefit for elite business credit cards. Citi skews the trend with its team of Personal Business Assistants, specialized service professionals who can perform high level tasks on behalf of companies instead of cardholders. Like other cards’ concierge desks, the Citi PBA team can book you a reservation at a hot restaurant or confirm your next travel itinerary.

These assistants add even more value by researching supplier costs, sourcing vendors, and handling more complex requests related to meetings and conferences. Issuing a CitiBusiness ThankYou Card to each employee on your team gives them the power to offload routine tasks and busywork via a secure, online portal. That could be the signature feature keeping this card in the competition for space in your wallet.

If the above features appeal to you, apply for a CitiBusiness ThankYou Card today to receive the 15,000 bonus points opportunity.

Photo: Kien Wai

{ 1 comment }

Young Americans Likely to Be Unbanked Regardless of Income Level

This article was written by in Banking. 13 comments.

In discussing unbanked and underbanked American consumers, we tend to focus on low socioeconomic status communities. The mainstream opinion is that building wealth and long-term financial stability relies on the use of traditional banking and investing products and the knowledge to use these products effectively. The financial industry tends to avoid low socioeconomic status communities for a variety of reasons, but the bottom line is that these customers have not been proven to be profitable. Taking the place of these mainstream institutions are check-cashing facilities and payday loan outfits, designed to be very profitable while providing the immediate services required in these communities.

These “low-class” financial product purveyors are part of a growing industry. As with any burgeoning industry, there is beginning to be more research into its consumers. The unbanked and underbanked consumer is becoming better defined, and traditional banks see this as an opportunity to create products that directly compete with the successful check-cashing and payday loan market.

Check CashingWith this new research comes some interesting findings. Prepaid debit cards are products designed for consumers with low or no credit scores, a condition that is more common among low-income households, though there are many reasons anyone in any income bracket could have damaged or undefined credit. Think Finance has determined that the use of prepaid debit cards is the same regardless of income level. Among the consumers surveyed, a representative sample of the Millennial generation, someone earning up to $74,999 a year is just as likely to use a prepaid debit card as someone earning less than $25,000 a year.

The statistics pertaining the check-cashing services show a similar trend. For a fee of usually 1 to 4 percent, a check-cashing storefront can immediately give you cash. So can any bank branch, but you often need to open an account first, and that requires patience, the willingness to share your personal information and submit to a ChexSystems verification, and the openness to endless marketing. In many cases, it’s just easier to just pay the fee. 34 percent of Millennials with the lowest income make use of check-cashing services outside of traditional banks, only 5 percentage points higher than those with the highest income.

An article in USA Today addresses what might representative of the fact that the status of unbanked or underbanked is pervasive in this age group regardless of income:

Ammy Orozco, 30, who works as an executive assistant at a Check Cashing USA branch in Miami, has a checking and savings account with Bank of America but often chooses to cash checks at work instead. She says she’d rather pay to cash a check immediately than pay for gas to drive to the bank. She has also taken out payday loans in emergencies. She’s tried to get a loan from the bank, but it was “stressful.”

“They wouldn’t confirm right away… You’re there sitting and you need the money, and you’re like, is this going to happen or not?”

Millennials expect instant gratification and are willing to look past fees and unnecessary expenses in order to feed this desire, regardless of income. For a generation whose defining economic moment has been the Great Recession, the credit crunch, and high unemployment, as well as the media environment dominated by stories about bank executives behaving badly, poor use of taxpayers’ money, and class-action lawsuits pertaining to anti-consumer practices, it’s understandable that a mistrust of the mainstream financial industry keeps people away from banks regardless of income. Half of Americans are not saving for retirement, and while unemployment certainly plays a role, lack of trust in the industry and in markets in general is an important factor.

With the proliferation of services targeted to the unbanked and underbanked reaching a wider set of customers — that is, popularity and use has moved beyond low socioeconomic status communities — regulators have begun to take notice. (In other words, these products and their negative effects were acceptable when they took advantage of only the poor and whoever you might assume is more likely to live in poor neighborhoods, but now that the middle class is targeted, it’s an issue worthy of consideration.) The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is looking into designing regulations for these products. Meanwhile, traditional financial institutions are taking advantage of this regulatory grey area to create products that compete with check-cashing storefronts and payday loan issuers, and to use these products as profit centers with the intent of eventually mainstreaming these customers into other profitable services.

Are you a Millennial who prefers immediate services like check cashing, payday loans, and prepaid debit cards instead of checking accounts, bank loans, and credit cards? This is not the primary audience of this website, but I’d love to hear some feedback from the millions of Americans who fit this description.

Photo: Daquella manera
USA Today

{ 13 comments }

Consumers Want Easier Online Payments

This article was written by in Consumer. 9 comments.

Yes, it’s frustrating to need to reach for my wallet and type in my credit card number every time I want to complete a purchase online. According to a recent MasterCard and Harris Interactive survey, 58 percent of consumers agree with me. Consumers even abandon their online shopping carts when the check-out process requires too much effort.

That might be good news for consumers. If a small barrier is all it takes to prevent someone from making a purchase, perhaps that purchase was not a necessity. Leaving more money in the bank rather than spending that money on some product that does not drive enough desire to get through a relatively painless process can only be beneficial to the shopper’s financial condition. Retailers, on the other hand, will obviously see consumers’ lack of purchase consummation as a problem, directly affecting sales and revenue.

The solution is to store the details pertaining to your payment method so it can be automatically retrieved at the point of sale. Amazon.com is certainly a pioneer with this approach. This company’s one-click purchasing process using stored credit card or debit card information makes buying a smooth process, although it created an uprising about patents when this feature was introduced many years ago.

PayPal has a good solution as well. Stores that allow payments through PayPal enable users to associate a credit card and avoid the need to type in a credit or debit card number each time.

Consumers can also use browser add-ons or downloadable programs, like LastPass, to store credit card information retrievable with a click or two.

Purchasing items online is much safer and more secure than being out in the world, carrying a wallet with all your credit cards and cash, and handing your credit cards to a waiter or gas station attendant who disappears for several minutes. Online security, as long as you confirm you are visiting a secure website, is trustworthy. No one is going to intercept my secure internet connection when I’m buying something online, and for the most part, I trust companies not to expose a database of credit card numbers to the public. That exposure is just as likely to happen when shopping in brick-and-mortar stores as when shopping online. The situation is unlikely, and shopping online does not add to that risk.

There is no universal solution, a one-click purchasing experience like that on Amazon.com, available to all retail websites. But there is also no equivalent to the one-click purchasing experience when you shop in store locations, either. Swiping a payment card or transmitting a secure wireless signal from your mobile phone gets close to the experience, but you still need to take out your wallet or your phone.

While retailers want to make it easier for consumers to pay money, consumers should be careful about making this process to automatic. Trading money for an object of some type should involve at least some opportunity to stop and consider the purchase. Technology makes it incredibly easy for consumers to part with their cash or increase their debt burden, and retailers want to make it easier. Consumers should be working against that trend and moving in the opposite direction.

If not, retailers will soon be able to simply reach into consumers’ pockets and take that money. Some companies offer free trial periods for their products and services without making it blatantly obvious that customers will be charged at the end of the trial period. Some create significant barriers to canceling the service in advance of the ending of the trial period. Consumer groups often criticize these policies, and some might be considered scams. If consumers make it increasingly easy to give up money without thought, then we’re just as much to blame.

Photo: Håkan Dahlström
BusinessWire

{ 9 comments }

Sprint in $300 Million Tax Fraud Lawsuit

This article was written by in Consumer. 4 comments.

In order to offer better prices to customers, Sprint has allegedly under-collected and underpaid New York State sales taxes by $100 million. If the Attorney General’s allegations are true, Sprint could end up owing the state government as much as $300 million or more due to underpayment penalties. Sprint is denying the charges, claiming they’ve paid all taxes as legally required to do so.

The Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, recognizes that if the suit is successful and Sprint must pay the penalty, it would be difficult for customers to escape the downstream effects. Just like any business, if Sprint is faced with an unplanned expense, they’ll need to come up with the difference elsewhere. That’s where customers who pay for services can help. Schneiderman says he wants the company, not the customers, to cover the cost of paying the back taxes.

That money is going to have to come from somewhere, however, and it’s not going to come from a reduction in executive salaries. While the Attorney General might have good intentions and companies should not be able to get away with deliberately and knowingly cheating on tax reporting, collection, and payment, I don’t see any way where the “company” can be penalized without hurting customers, shareholders, and employees.

Shareholders are already hurting; as of writing this article, the stock price is already down more than 4 percent. $300 million is a significant expense, even for a company that earned a revenue of $33.7 billion last year. The company actually didn’t profit on paper in 2011, and that certainly makes a $300 million fine sting more.

If a company over-collected and overpaid taxes, customers would be calling for refunds. A class action lawsuit would demand restitution. In this hypothetical situation as well as the actual lawsuit Sprint faces for underpayment, the set of customers is the unintentional third party of fraud. In both cases, the customer ends up suffering in the long run. Class action lawsuits barely benefit customers. The lawyers seem to do well, though.

In Sprint’s statement, the company claims they’re protecting their customers:

… [W]ith this lawsuit, the attorney-general’s office is claiming New York consumers, who already pay some of the highest wireless taxes in the country, should pay even more. We intend to stand up for New York consumers’ rights and fight this suit.

I find it hard to believe that any for-profit company has any interest in “standing up for consumers’ rights.” If Sprint doesn’t like the tax laws, they should do what all companies do: lobby for tax law changes that benefit them more. Of course, that wouldn’t work, because then Verizon Wireless and AT&T could also benefit from lower taxes. If the allegations are true, the company’s actions have nothing to do with Sprint’s defense of lower taxes for consumers. It’s about using any tactic possible, even illegal, to fight in a competitive market.

Give me a break. Does anyone really believe corporate marketing-speak?

Are you a Sprint customer? If so, did you choose Sprint due to their lower monthly service fees? Would you remain a customer if the fees increased — a likely result of this lawsuit, whether successful or not?

Financial Times

{ 4 comments }

Aurora Bank’s Deposits to Be Acquired By New York Community Bank

by Flexo

Last year, I opened a money market account with Aurora Bank, a division of Lehman Brothers. If it seemed like an odd thing to do, it probably was. Lehman Brothers had filed for bankruptcy in 2008, yet in 2011, they were promoting their online retail bank and looking for new customers. Not wanting to associate ... Continue reading this article…

0 comments Read the full article →

The Cost of Raising a Child With Autism

by Flexo

A few years ago, I shared a statistic showing that it costs almost $200,000 to raise a child, from birth to age eighteen. If that weren’t enough of a financial burden, consider that one out of 88 children are now diagnosed with autism, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (source, pdf). Regardless ... Continue reading this article…

11 comments Read the full article →

How to Handle a Credit Card Data Breach

by Flexo

Last week, Global Payments confirmed a massive security breach involving credit and debit card numbers and information. Global Payments operates a gateway; when you use your credit or debit card to purchase an item — and this could be online or in a brick-and-mortar store — your card information is sent through Global Payments or ... Continue reading this article…

8 comments Read the full article →

Podcast 152: LearnVest

by Flexo

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Bryan J Busch talks with Ainslie Simmonds, Chief Marketing Officer of LearnVest. They discuss the free and paid features of LearnVest, how people are using the service and what sets it apart from other methods of financial planning. Consumerism Commentary Podcast LearnVest: S06E21 / 176 Download – RSS – ... Continue reading this article…

3 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 4712345···Last »