As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: stimulus-bill


Improving your financial situation requires more than just trying harder. People who write financial websites offering advice often think or imply that the reason for financial misfortune is ignorance of the basics. Recently, there was one website that claimed that the only thing people need to know was spend less than you earn, as if taking this to heart is the single solution to getting your finances on the right track.

There is no switch that you can just turn on, for the most part. In some cases, particularly where someone experiences a major emotional setback — “hits rock bottom” — changing your direction in place works, but that could mean losing a house or destroying a family relationship. A devastating situation isn’t guaranteed for everyone and you may not want to wait until you reach such a low point.

MoneyIf you’ve been living in debt for the entirety of your adult life, you may have an epiphany of some sort and turn yourself around with just the knowledge that your net worth needs to increase at the end of each month in order to become financially independent, but for most people, changing behavior takes much more than desire.

There are certain things you can do to help yourself — and your brain — accept that you need to start improving your financial situations for the sake of your future self and family.

Replace old habits with new habits

Much behavior can be reduced to patterns and habits. Breaking a habit, like emotional spending, can be incredibly difficult because of the comfort that has developed through years of participating in the activity. Shoppers who derive pleasure from spending money may be in uncontrollable debt, and use shopping in difficult times to feel better. Of course, with more shopping and spending more money than is available, this person could experience emotionally difficult situations due to the lack of finances, yet still seek to cure those negative feelings by shopping.

Replace the reaction of shopping with something that makes you feel better without damaging your personal finances. Exercising releases chemicals in the brain that, for many people, enable happy feelings, so one of the best options for replacing a bad financial habit is exercise. Whenever you feel the urge to do something that you know is harmful to your finances, choose to run around the block or work out in a gym.

It might be difficult to make this change at first, but the goal is to make a new habit that can be triggered in place of your old habit. For some time, you may want to overlap both reactions, but after several weeks of consciously using your new habit, you should be able to successfully replace the old.

Resist temptation by making it difficult or inconvenient

Some financial advisers and gurus suggest freezing your credit card in ice or keeping your emergency fund at a bank that’s difficult to access. The more barriers you can place between yourself and your bad financial behaviors (in this case, using your credit card or dipping into your emergency fund), the more success you’ll have in avoiding these temptations.

Combining barriers with habits can be successful, too. Rather than purchasing items from Amazon on impulse, create a habit of waiting 24 hours between your desire and your action. This barrier of time gives you the opportunity to re-evaluate your decision. Twenty-four hours later, you may be in a different mood and decide that you don’t need the item you intended to purchase as bad as you thought you did.

Remove barriers to good financial behavior

While you’re adding barriers to prevent bad financial behavior, you may want to think about whether you already have barriers preventing you from making good financial decisions. Although the stock market has been on a rally lately, medium-term performance has not been great, and the investing industry has attracted a bad reputation through and following the recession and credit crunch. The fear of losing money may be preventing young people from investing in the stock market.

Many investment advisers say that you should evaluate your risk and only invest in a way that makes you comfortable with your possible losses, but an investor’s level of risk aversion could be tied to his or her feelings about the stock market. Risk profile measured this way would then fluctuate. One possible outcome from feeling good about the stock market and willing to take on risk during times of confidence about Wall Street while feeling nervous when the media is taking the financial industry to task is the unprofitable accidental strategy of buying high and selling low.

If you’re young and would like to save for retirement, with a goal of leaving your work behind one day with enough money to pay your expenses, you can’t ignore the stock market. A diversified portfolio may not make you rich over time, but there’s a good chance you’ll be able to retire.

Change your words

The words you choose to describe your financial behaviors will have an effect on your approach to your money. For example, take “investment” and “expense.” I mentioned this phenomenon in my editor’s note after Jennifer Calonia’s article about wedding planning and spending.

One way people often justify or rationalize expenses is by calling them “investments.” For example, one might say, “Spending a large amount of money for a wedding is an investment in your relationship.” Someone else might say, “Going to a private university is an investment in your future.” You should only invest in something when you receive an asset in return, and you are planning for the value of that asset to increase over time.

You may be able to argue that the asset you receive in return for a wedding is a partner who stays with you for the rest of your life. You may receive an emotional asset in return. But in order to be truthful with yourself, consider whether you’re using the term “investment” to justify paying more for a ceremony than you need to. As I’ve written previously, spending money for once-in-a-lifetime event is not a bad way to spend money if you can afford it, but calling it an investment is just a way for you to feel better about your resulting lack of money.

In return for your expense for your college-level education, you may receive assets: your ability to earn an increased income over time when compared with someone with just a high school diploma, possibly, cognitive skills that help you succeed in the world regardless of your job, career, or income, and, possibly, connections that you retain for the rest of your life, helping you with career moves and friendships. The values of these things may increase over time, making the term “investment” more legitimate. The trouble appears when you pay a higher price for education than necessary, calling it an investment.

If you ask anyone who has any experience with finance, a house is an asset and a mortgage is a liability. Yet, some financial gurus continue to insist that a house is a liability. This doesn’t make any sense from a purely financial perspective, but if you look at the connotations of the words instead of the meanings — or if you look at the broader sense of “liability” rather than its financial sense — these gurus might have an argument. A house that does not create cash flow for you (that is, a house that is not an investment with rental income) should be avoided as much as possible. Anything that costs you money is a liability in the sense that is drags your finances down. Although it’s not financially accurate, considering bad assets “liabilities” encourages you to eliminate as many of these as possible and to replace them with income-producing assets.

Politicians and activists use word choice to influence their constituents’ opinions all the time. That’s why we have terms like “pro-life” and “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.” It’s a form of manipulation, but if you’re using this technique to benefit your financial situation, no one can blame you for misdirection.

Using these tricks — replacing old habits with new habits, adding barriers to bad behaviors, removing barriers to good choices, and changing the words to describe what you do — can help you overcome the difficulty of putting what you know about “spending less than you earn” into effect. There’s a bridge between knowledge and action, and unfortunately, many people mistakenly think that the reason so many people in the United States are suffering financially is due to lack of knowledge. The prescribe solutions like money management class in high school and other financial literacy initiatives. Having more information is not going to solve financial illiteracy. On an individual or family level, taking steps to modify behavior will certainly move finances in the right direction.

khrawlings

{ 10 comments }

The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009, the 2009 economic stimulus bill, provided an opportunity for homeowners in trouble to qualify for mortgage modifications. The Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and the “Making Home Affordable” provided support for lenders who worked with homeowners.

Part of the requirement for qualifying for the modification program is for borrowers to have missed a number of payments. This put homeowners who could benefit from the program, in trouble but not yet delinquent, in a tough position. They would need to skip payments, even if they could pay, ruining their credit in the process. In addition, lenders made it difficult to qualify, with understaffed departments handling the cases, a lack of communication, mixed messages from customer service, and overall disorganization.

Mortgage RefinanceA more pressing problem with HAMP was that borrowers were required to owe less than 125% of a home’s value — and in a tough market where home values were falling, it was much easier for a homeowner to find himself in that position — and to have a high credit score.

Without HAMP delivering the desired effect, the Obama administration is looking at improving the concept as a part of the latest economic stimulus package. A third round of quantitative easing is unlikely to gain wide support, at least not in that form, so the federal government is looking for ways to reduce the risk of a second recession, a double-dip recession, or any other type of economic problem.

The Obama administration is seeking feedback on a new round of stimulus designed to help more homeowners qualify for a mortgage refinance. After a decade of lax lending standards, following the recession and credit crunch they have tightened, making it difficult for consumer with marginal credit histories — or even something not too out of the ordinary, like self-employment income without W2 income — to qualify. The new program will seek to allow more homeowners to refinance at a time when mortgage interest rates are very low.

Another aspect of this program would take federally-owned housing and convert the buildings into rentals, turning them over to investment firms to manage.

The plan could actually help pay down the deficit, as there are unspent funds that have been set aside for stimulus:

The idea is appealing because it would not necessarily require Congressional action. It also would not tap any of the $45.6 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Funds that was set aside to help struggling homeowners. Only $22.9 billion of that pool has been spent or pledged so far, and fewer than 1.7 million loans have been modified under federal programs. But Andrea Risotto, a Treasury spokeswoman, said whatever was left would be used to reduce the federal deficit.

Photo: Tom Hilton
New York Times

{ 12 comments }

President Obama proposed yesterday spending more than $50 billion over the next six years to modernize the transportation infrastructure in the United States. He is calling for renovations to or creation of 150,000 miles of roads, 4,000 miles of rail, and 150 miles of airport runways. The $50 billion would be an up-front cost, paid by closing tax breaks for oil and gas companies, and would comprise the bulk of the cost.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the 2009 economic stimulus) designated $105 billion for infrastructure improvements last year, and coincidentally, the $7 billion spent from 1936 to 1939 by the Works Progress Administration mostly on similar projects would be the same as spending $105 billion in 2009 thanks to the effects of inflation. We would assume that the results of the ARRA should mirror the results of the WPA.

The WPA provided jobs, crucial infrastructure upgrades, and even major cultural advances, even though critics say some of the money was wasted. The positive effects also took some time to be realized, though it had a relatively immediate effect on jobs. In a tough political climate, Obama wants to speed the process and provide more jobs by infusing more capital into infrastructure projects.

The proposal may be a moot point as a law to authorize the spending might never be passed by Congress. But if it does, and it survives similar to the president’s proposed form, it carries some interesting ideas. First, an infrastructure investment bank would be created to determine which projects receive funding, supposedly based on return on investment, not political connections. Investment in smarter roads and high-speed rail lines would allow the United States to become competitive with other developed and developing nations around the world who have already seen these technological advances.

On a practical level, improving roads seems to be an endless project. Not far from where I live, US Route 1 in the New Brunswick area has been in a constant state of construction. The Route 1 intersection with Route 130 in North Brunswick was finished to remove traffic lights a few years ago, and besides planned intersection upgrades throughout the Route 1 corridor, the past year traffic has been slower due to a project to widen the highway as it passes near Rutgers University.

{ 11 comments }

Last week I offered some last-minute tax filing tips, and the IRS deadline is looming. I’m happy to tackle tax questions, and Consumerism Commentary reader Eric has one. Eric was a full-time student through May 2009, and he, like many former students, is dealing with the cost of a college education. Eric is looking for more information on the American Opportunity Tax Credit.

Here is what I know.

The American Opportunity Tax Credit is one of the many benefits enacted within the American Recovery and Investment Act (ARRA) of 2009, otherwise known as the 2009 economic stimulus. This new credit changes the Hope Tax Credit, a benefit designed to encourage more people to attend college. The American Opportunity Credit goes farther than the Hope Credit in a number of ways.

The American Opportunity Credit allows taxpayers to get credit for money spent on tuition and some other education-related fees in 2009 and 2010. Unlike the Hope Credit, you can file to receive the new credit for expenses for each of the first four years of higher education. The maximum credit you can receive is $2,500 this year for 2009 expenses and $2,500 next year for 2010 expenses.

The new tax credit is partially refundable. That does not mean you have to pay part of the benefit back to the government. “Refundable” means that the credit can become a refund to be sent to you, even if you owe less tax overall than the amount of the credit. Your tax bill can go “below zero,” resulting in a check from the government to you. This is a great benefit for current and recently-graduated students whose income may not be significant. Only 40% of the total deduction is refundable, however, so those who owe no tax will only receive a credit of at most $1,000.

Who is eligible for the American Opportunity Tax Credit?

Only taxpayers whose modified adjusted gross income is less than $80,000 (or $160,000 for joint filers) is eligible for the full amount of the credit. With a higher MAGI, the maximum credit begins to phase out until it is gone completely for taxpayers earning more than $90,000 (or $180,000). The taxpayer claiming the credit needs to have paid qualifying tuition or other education expenses.

You may want to consider taking either the Lifetime Learning Credit or a tax deduction for tuition and education expenses. Taxpayers can only claim one credit or the deduction for each student. For example, parents claiming a daughter and a son, both in college, as dependents could choose a Lifetime Learning Credit for one and the American Opportunity Credit for the other. They could not, however, claim both credits or one credit and the deduction for their son.

Here is where the beauty of most online tax filing software is revealed; most will ask you to list your expenses and will tell you which filing option will be best for you based on your entire tax situation.

What form should be used to claim the American Opportunity Tax Credit?

The latest Form 8663 from the IRS includes the American Opportunity Tax Credit. If you are claiming this credit, you cannot use Form 1040-EZ for filing your taxes. You will need to use Form 1040 or 1040A.

{ 1 comment }

New Stimulus Plan: The Fiscal Menace or The Economy Strikes Back?

by Flexo

(Or perhaps Episode IV: Obama’s New Hope.) In a few weeks the Senate will be debating another stimulus plan. This one is billed as a jobs creation package with a $154 billion price tag. It’s an extension of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and its purpose is to increase public funding for ... Continue reading this article…

10 comments Read the full article →

Energy Efficient Appliance Upgrade, Anyone?

by Smithee

Much like the wildly popular and probably successful Cash for Clunkers program earlier this year, a portion of the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is being allotted to a program for upgrading older, energy wasting appliances. None of the important details have been released yet, such as “what Energy Star rating will my new ... Continue reading this article…

4 comments Read the full article →

President Obama and Congress Extend the $8,000 Home Buyers’ Credit

by Flexo

It’s official. Today President Obama will sign a bill into law that extends the $8,000 First Time Home Buyers’ Tax Credit, recently set to expire on November 30, until April 30 next year. The tax credit, originally part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was intended to stimulate the real estate industry, ... Continue reading this article…

32 comments Read the full article →

Extending the $8,000 First-Time Home Buyer Credit to $15,000

by Flexo

Update: The first-time home buyer tax credit has been extended and expanded. Click here for the latest details. The information below is now out-dated. The Senate is considering a number of changes to the $8,000 first-time home buyers credit. Spurred on by Sen. Johnny Isakson from Georgia, the adjustments being considered seek to expand the ... Continue reading this article…

18 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 3123