As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: tithe

This is a guest article by Jennifer Calonia, Junior Editor at GoBankingRates. In the article, the author encourages couples in failing relationships to break-up before holidays and their obligatory expenses are imminent.

While it may sound like the antithesis of romance, calling it quits with your other half before the Valentine’s Day can be advantageous to your heart and your checkbook. Gift-giving and travel (if your significant other is across country) on Valentine’s Day is poised to destroy the savings of those who are too apprehensive to raise the white flag of surrender when it comes to their dead-end relationship.

According to a 2010 report by graphic designers Lee Byron and David McCandless, more couples break up toward the end of the calendar year–peaking two weeks before Christmas and the month after Valentine’s Day.

Valentine's DayThe data were gathered by conducting a year-long search on Facebook statuses which included the words “break up” or “broken up.”

Many argue that data used by Byron and McCandless is drawn from a highly defined sample pool, noting that most Facebook users are younger in their years. Despite that limitation, this study raises significant questions for those in the midst of a turbulent or stagnant relationship.

Break up to save money on gifts and travel

As the saying goes, “breaking up is hard to do,” but it could be a wise financial decision to opt out of your relationship if it’s already hit a brick wall. Instead of waiting for the report’s break-up peak after Valentine’s Day, why not face reality before February lands on your doorstep?

Observances like Valentine’s Day are among the highest-rated gift-giving holidays among couples next to birthdays. According to the National Retail Federation, in 2011, the average expense on Valentine’s Day gifts to a significant other was $68.98 — a figure that is on the rise.

Further, all of the subsequent holidays in the year (i.e. Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year’s and a sprinkled birthday) present an open door for extra out-of-pocket travel expenses when planning to attend your partner’s family gathering or scheming a romantic getaway.

At the risk of being denounced as cold-hearted or even cheap, severing strained relationships before Valentine’s Day is at minimum, a savvy move for your wallet.

Broken heart: better investment

Seeking out and fostering a relationship with a partner is at its root an effort in finding a spouse. Stringing your significant other along when you don’t see a future ahead is not only by many people’s standards cruel, it’s a fruitless investment. Whether you’re dealing with emotions or finances, keeping long-term goals in sight are an important aspect of achieving success and happiness, overall.

Struggling relationships may not see another opportunity to break up until March, and time is money. There is never a “good time” to break-up, so biding one’s time after the holiday season and into Valentine’s Day is not the most effective approach in the long haul.

Break up with civility before February 14 comes around and open yourself up to a well-rounded year of improvements in 2012.

Editor’s note: I can’t say I’m a fan of making relationship or romantic decisions with finances as a trigger. Personal finance experts tend to see the world in terms of money; if you’re a hammer, everything looks like a nail, or so the saying goes. Obviously finances must be a consideration in major decision-making, and ending a bad relationship earlier rather than later is a better choice than lingering. The worst case scenario is losing a quality relationship over the cost of a bouquet of flowers or a meaningful gift.

{ 16 comments }

As Ron Lieber reported in the New York Times, personal finance guru Suze Orman is launching her own debit card brand, the Approved Card, following in the footsteps of music mogul Russell Simmons and his Rush Cards. Suze Orman’s debit card will be a prepaid debit card, ensuring customers using the card can spend generally only what they have available.

As a benefit to customers, and in keeping with Suze Orman’s focus on helping consumers build stable credit histories, the card will offer unlimited, free credit reports. She also worked out a deal with Transunion whereby her branded debit card, unlike most other debit cards, will report consumer spending information to the bureau, theoretically helping customers build credit.

Suze OrmanWhile a consumer’s ability to use debit card spending as a way to build credit, I can understand why the reporting agencies don’t normally consider debit card activity to be relevant to a credit score. With a debit card, you can pay only what you have in the bank, or in the case of a prepaid debit card, only what you have on deposit. Debit cards do not provide a consumer with the opportunity to be tested with credit, and there is no monthly bill to pay. The type of behavior required to use a debit card successfully does not equate with the behavior required when borrowing money.

Prepaid debit cards are notorious for their fees. Suze has pledged to keep the Approved Card’s fees low, but the card still features a $3 monthly fee, taken from the balance deposited on the card. Prepaid debit card fees are paid by consumers who have no interest in a traditional checking account held at a bank, or, for whatever reason, can’t qualify for a bank account. This unbanked population consists primarily of households in the lowest socioeconomic status and of minorities. This puts these products in the same category as payday loans and check cashing outfits. Services the middle class doesn’t need or can find for free are more expensive in less affluent communities.

While the fees for Suze’s product may be less than those for competing products, there could be a view that this product, just like others like it, takes advantage of consumers who have fewer options for payment options. View the fee schedule here; there are quite a few fees that most consumers who haven’t used prepaid debit cards might consider extraordinary.

Does Suze risk credibility by offering her own financial product? She has established her Suze Orman brand as a no-nonsense voice in helping people make smarter financial decisions. Her television and radio shows have attracted a wide audience, particularly through the recent recession. She has been a spokesperson for General Motors and TD Ameritrade, aiding the executives of those companies in associating their brands with wise personal finance decisions.

While the New York Times article indicates that Suze will not mention her Approved Card in her shows to avoid a conflict of interest, isn’t in reasonable to expect that every time she mentions prepaid debit cards, she could be creating or strengthening a cognitive link in the listener or reader between her advice and her own product?

On the other hand, Suze sells books, seminars, and kits, and her media appearances help to move her products and, eventually, generate some of the income she receives each year. (I would assume that most of her income comes from sponsorship, show production, and media appearances rather than from her products.) A prepaid debit card is not really much different from the other products she sells. Diversifying income streams is a great way to increase the probability of long-term success.

What do you think about Suze Orman’s new Approved Card and the potential conflict of interest arising from her public appearances and media presence?

Update: As news spread of the Approved Card throughout the blogosphere, the card’s terms and likely ineffectiveness in improving users’ credit scores led to outrage. Suze Orman responded to critics via Twitter by calling them idiots and ignorant. Critics of the card were mostly fair — at least they were level-headed and, for the most part, they avoided personal attacks on Suze — but it’s easy for privileged bloggers like us to misunderstand the needs of those in low socio-economic communities, where the banking industry is mistrusted more than middle class “Main Street” communities mistrust Wall Street.

Yes, as I’ve mentioned above, there is something about fee-ridden prepaid debit cards that enables investors and the wealthy to take advantage of people who either don’t or believe they don’t have better financial options. There is also a cost to businesses who take on risks by offering services to a segment of society that may have financial trouble, and fees help defray that risk. Compared to other prepaid debit cards, the Approved Card isn’t horrible. It certainly isn’t the worst. If Suze’s name weren’t attached to the product, bloggers might put the card towards the top of the list of best prepaid debit cards. But her public identity and crusade for positive financial education makes the product antithetical.

At the same time, it’s not much different than the seminars that most of the top financial gurus run, charging tons of money with promises to help people earn more money, get rich through real estate, or sell a multi-level marketing scheme. The business is in the selling, and convincing the most vulnerable people that you are there to help them (for a price). Not that that’s good, at all — it’s just expected.

Photo: david_shankbone
New York Times

{ 56 comments }

Today’s guest on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast is Liz Weston, author of The 10 Commandments of Money: Survive and Thrive in the New Economy, and the most-read personal finance columnist on the Internet. Liz, Flexo and Bryan discuss each of the ten commandments in the book.

The 10 Commandments of Money is available in the Consumerism Commentary Store.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast #94
The 10 Commandments of Money, Liz Weston: S04E16 / 117

Adobe Flash required
DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents

[00:00] Introduction from Bryan J Busch
[00:38] Interview with Liz Weston
[01:02] Why are they commandments?
[02:01] A budget that works in the real world
[03:12] The 50/30/20 plan
[04:28] Charitable giving
[05:21] Needs vs. wants
[06:37] Survival plan with cash and credit
[09:10] Neutral debt vs. toxic debt
[11:25] Federal student loans vs. private student loans
[13:01] Risk-free investments
[14:23] Stocks vs. bonds or cash?
[15:38] Your home as a piggy bank
[16:52] Started homes
[18:31] Remodeling and improving your home
[20:00] Changes to retirement
[22:44] Value of a college education
[24:12] Maximizing financial aid
[25:32] Too much insurance
[27:38] Choosing life insurance
[28:40] Treat your marriage like a business
[31:08] The war on consumers
[32:23] How banks spy on you
[33:18] Credit unions as an alternative, FindACreditUnion.com
[35:40] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

Theme music by Mindcube.

Full transcript

Read the full article →

{ 4 comments }

When I started Consumerism Commentary in 2003, after about eight years of writing on the internet in a smaller, more personal capacity, I only had two goals: to track my finances while working to improve my money situation and to learn more about personal finance by finding articles, sharing links, and adding occasional thoughts of my own. Over a year later, I added advertising to Consumerism Commentary, and within another year, the website became more than just a way for me to track my financial improvement, it became an essential part of that progression.

For the last three or so years, I’ve been earning more from Consumerism Commentary than I have been from my day job. At times it has been significantly more, expressible in multiples — enough for me to consider leaving my career behind and write for the website and tend to other related business on a full-time basis. I’ve ultimately decided to make this jump, and now it’s only a matter of timing.

Claude Monet Bridge Over a Pond of Water LiliesThroughout this time, I’ve been receiving request after request to write more about the income I receive outside of my day job. I’ve been reluctant to write about earning money from blogging. My primary reason for this reluctance is that the concept of blogging is not directly related to the concept of personal finance. Although the topics on Consumerism Commentary occasionally stretch away from pure personal finance, I want to remain focused.

Asking me to write more about blogging would be similar to asking David Bach to offer his opinions about the process of writing a bestselling series of books rather than about the content within those books. (I don’t mean to imply any similarity or equivalence between myself and David Bach.) An even better illustration would be asking Claude Monet to paint his impression of how he paints a scene rather than his impression of a bridge over a pond of water lilies. It’s too “meta,” an added level of abstraction between something that exists and its representation.

I also don’t want to write about earning money for blogging because I’d prefer not to draw attention to my success. Of course, that is antithetical to most people’s suggestions for broadening a “personal brand.” I think it should be obvious that at this point I have little desire to be a renowned expert. No one in the “real world” has any interest in taking advice from someone who calls himself Flexo, a name chosen in about five seconds when there were no expectations for growth. “Personal branding” is furthest from my intentions.

Despite this, I reluctantly admit that earning money from blogging, just like earning money from a career or saving money on non-discretionary expenses, is a legitimate aspect of personal finance. I shouldn’t shy away from writing about the process of blogging.

So here is what I have learned from almost seven years at Consumerism Commentary, and at a lesser extent, from fifteen years writing for the web and almost twenty years building online communities including a popular modem-based bulletin board system in the early 1990s. (I’ll be thirty-four next month; it’s up to you whether you want to consider my teenage years managing a BBS as experience, but it is surprisingly similar to what I do today.)

Consider some of these points before starting a blog to earn money.

1. Increase success by writing about your passions

Which comes first, the topic or the passion? Much of the “earn money by blogging” advice I’ve seen suggests would-be internet moguls should start their business by determining which topic generates the most income overall and creating content within that topic. Unfortunately, that leads to a lot of people writing about personal finance, a lucrative topic thanks to a proliferation of deep-pocketed advertisers in the financial industry. Even broader than the topic of personal finance, it also results in proliferation of less-than-inspiring content, more noise making it difficult to discover the signal.

I don’t see this as a path to long-term success. It leads to frustration when the dollars don’t appear quickly or don’t appear at all. The only path that seems to work well is to start writing only if you have a passion for a certain topic and only if you are willing to dedicate time and effort into creating content at the highest level you can. You don’t choose the topic, the topic chooses you.

2. If you write with dollar signs in your eyes, don’t bother

It’s true that financial success is expedited by focusing on the business aspects of your endeavor, and I often hear from people who believe that if an untalented writer like myself can earn a living by writing on Consumerism Commentary, anyone can. However, most people will not earn a living from blogging-related income.

Many dollar-chasers start writing about the lucrative topic of personal finance without either a passion or interest in the subject. I read perhaps thousands of articles each week and it is crystal clear to me when a blogger is inspired by the topic and when a blogger is inspired by potential income.

Here is what I think about when evaluating whether a blogger is motivated primarily by potential income:

  • Is the writer more interested in quality or quantity? Quantity is necessary in order to get noticed by search engines, but quality provides a better experience for the reader. Attaining both would be a good goal; I try to find a balance while other successful bloggers take obsession over quality to an extreme and try to “save the world” with every article.
  • Are the articles written for the benefit of the reader, the blogger, or the advertiser? I give exceptional writers free passes to throw in a post for affiliate income if the overall tone of the blog does not involve shilling for companies. If every article borders on advertisement, my impression is the blogger is writing solely for money.
  • Does the blogger bother removing spam comments or spam links within comments? A website operator who can’t be bothered to filter noise from comments is not interested in creating a user-friendly experience. Many times I’ve stopped myself from linking to an otherwise excellent article that’s full of spam links at the bottom of the comments section.
  • Is there any personality within the articles or does the blog read like it could appear in a textbook? When I was looking to add writers to the Consumerism Commentary staff, I found that those who considered themselves “freelance writers” had a more difficult time bringing something personal to the tone. I like to know that there is a human being behind the words.

It is good that talented experts and dedicated amateurs are able to earn compensation for producing quality content and for making it available to the internet-browsing and searching public. But as the popularity of earning money through blogging has increased, so have the bloggers who are interested more in fattening their bank accounts than they are in adding something valuable to the world.

3. Have a mission statement or at least a mission

Original layout, Consumerism CommentaryConsumerism Commentary began without any income-related goals. Its purpose was to keep myself accountable for my finances and to help me learn more about money. That was, and is, the mission of this website. It sounds somewhat selfish on the surface; Consumerism Commentary is mostly for my own benefit, not for the readers.

This approach is, however, less self-focused than it sounds. The opposite approach would be to write a blog under the assumption that the author has all the answers and with the purpose of teaching others, ignoring the possibility that the author has more to learn. This is self-fashioned or self-proclaimed expertise, and I find it unappealing.

4. Earning money takes time

I don’t know exactly when Google created AdSense, but I do know it was not available when I started Consumerism Commentary. Very few blogs at that time earned money. I added the first AdSense advertisement to the website in November 2004, about sixteen months after my first post here. It was more of an experiment than anything else, and I had no expectations for income.

My cumulative earnings didn’t reach $100, the threshold for receiving the first check from Google, until April 2005. That is six months after the first ad appeared on the website, almost a year after Consumerism Commentary began, ten years after I had been writing for the web, and fourteen years after I started creating online communities.

I was lucky that there weren’t many, if any, other blogs discussing personal finance when I started Consumerism Commentary. There are thousands now, so it is more difficult to stand out in this particular niche. The same is true for the wider web, as well.

But great talent will always rise to the top. J.D. Roth is one of my favorite examples. He started writing on Get Rich Slowly in April 2006 and is one of the finest writers among those focusing on personal finance. Although there were over a thousand personal finance blogs when he started, he quickly rose to the top of the list. J.D. had been writing a personal blog since at least 2001, and that experience should not be ignored when looking at his path to success.

It is almost five years after I received that first AdSense check. Now there are more bloggers competing for advertisers, and putting the recession aside, more advertising dollars to go around. So I believe it is still realistic to expect income to come in slowly during the first year. If waiting six months for the first $100 seems like too much work for too little return, you may want to consider a different business venture.

5. Success takes more than just writing

I am reminded of why I’m perhaps not as successful as I could be. Over the past few years, I’ve been working harder at writing and managing this and several other websites. Unfortunately, I’ve put aside important aspects of building a successful website and community, such as participating on similar websites. As I mentioned above I read thousands of articles each week. About 70 percent of these articles are on “mainstream” websites or major media blogs and 30 percent are on amateur or independent blogs.

With more time, I would be able to participate in discussions and social networking media more. This participation in the larger community will assist with increasing the chance for success with a blog.

So is earning money through blogging unrealistic?

There is significant potential for earning money, possibly even earning a living, through blogging. For many people, especially those who are not passionate and dedicated, financial success will be elusive. My intent is not to discourage but to help manage expectations.

It’s great that free and widely available tools on the internet can help anyone can have a voice. You need to strive for excellence in order to stand out both to readers and to advertisers. It’s not enough to write occasional uninspired articles, put up a few ads, and wait for the money to roll in.

Readers can expect at least one more article on Consumerism Commentary about the specific ways I earn money from blogging with suggestions helpful to those who are writing about their passion and are ready to form a strategy for building diversified, self-sufficient income.

Because I was writing for new audiences, my recent ten-day tour forced me to write better articles than I normally write for Consumerism Commentary. This experience, in addition to my decision to put thoughts together for this article on earning money through blogging, helped me realize that I need to focus on improving my writing skills and find time for more participation within the community.

{ 68 comments }

Carnival of Debt Reduction: Tips via Twitter Edition

by Flexo

Welcome to the Carnival of Debt Reduction, a traveling weekly roundup of the best articles in the blogosphere covering credit cards, consumer debt, mortgages, and the elimination thereof. Here is more information about the Carnival of Debt Reduction, founded by Mighty Bargain Hunter. Through this past week, many bloggers submitted articles to be featured in ... Continue reading this article…

10 comments Read the full article →

News and Blogs: Monday, November 17, 2008

by Flexo

Announcement: As a reminder, I am featuring guest authors next week. If you’re interested, please read my posts by following that link and contact me to discuss a topic. I’ll need all submissions by Friday. Thanks! Americans are Digging Deep to Save Money. Frugality is the new trend, with a new USA Today poll that ... Continue reading this article…

6 comments Read the full article →

Where Is the Place for Irreplaceableness in the Work Environment?

by Flexo

Yes, irreplaceableness appears to be a legitimate word. Even if it weren’t, there’s a good chance you could infer its meaning without doubt. It wouldn’t matter if the word actually appears in a dictionary. Now that that’s out of the way… My former boss was laid off last week. It had only been a matter ... Continue reading this article…

21 comments Read the full article →

Five Couples Living on $46k, Number 2: The Thibaults

by Flexo

Here is the second couple featured by CNN Money in their series about five couples living on an income of $46,000 a year. Michael Thibault is an insurance claims adjuster and Lisa Thibault works part-time. Together, they may earn about $60,000 this year in Indianapolis, Indiana. That seems to put them at an income significantly ... Continue reading this article…

28 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 212