As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: treasury


Several readers contacted me yesterday with this piece of good news. After months of promising its customers to launch the new feature soon, ING Direct now offers remote check deposit. The delay was likely caused by the efforts that resulted in Capital One purchasing ING Direct USA. Previously, in order to deposit a check into an ING Direct savings or “Electric Orange” checking account, you would have needed to mail the check to a deposit address, deposit the check in a local bank branch and transfer the money to ING Direct later, or find an ATM that allowed deposits to the online bank.

Although paper checks are heading towards obsolescence and electronic person-to-person transactions are becoming more mainstream, some people still find paper checks convenient. For self-employed individuals and business owners, checks from clients are still a very common way of doing business.

Remote check deposit, where you do not need to visit a bank to deposit a check or send it through the mail and wait, is made possible by the “Check 21″ law. With the advancement of technology, an image of a check is just as legitimate as the check itself. In the last decade, banks have been providing scanners to business customers to securely scan and email check images for deposit.

This was an expensive proposition. In recent years, the process has improved, thanks again to technology. The cameras on cell phones now have enough resolution for these purposes. Rather than sending its customers large pieces of hardware, banks offer mobile phone applications — often for both iOS and Android — that use the phone’s camera and a secure internet connection to make remote deposit as easy as snapping a photograph or two.

How ING Direct’s remote deposit “CheckMate” works

ING DirectI wanted to try ING Direct’s remote deposit service, but without a check written to my personal account handy, I wrote myself a check for $10, withdrawing from my local Wells Fargo account. I downloaded the ING Direct app for my Android phone and configured my account. As expected, I needed my customer number, PIN, answers to several security questions, and recognition of my secret image, similar configuring online access on a new computer.

Once logged in, “Deposit” was an option at the top of the screen, alongside my account overview and transfers. To initiate remote deposit, the software required me to read and accept the CheckMate terms and conditions. The terms included a warning that deposits will be held by the bank for up to 5 business days. This is typical for check deposits to ING Direct, so it’s not completely unexpected. It is unfortunate, as even check deposits are often considered electronic transactions. The hold doesn’t apply to payroll checks or checks from the U.S. Treasury like federal tax refunds.

Check deposits using the ING Direct software are limited to $3,000 per check. Compared with Chase Bank’s $500 limit, this is an improvement, but could still make the service useless for some customers.

Once I agreed to the terms, the software prompted me to take a photograph of first the front of the check then the back of the check. It was difficult to focus on the back of the check, so I tried twice, changing the lighting environment to try to get a photograph that was more precise and included a legible copy of my signature.

After confirming both photographs, I entered the amount of the check and selected the account in which I wanted the $10 deposited. At the end of the process, I tapped the button to deposit the check and received this response:

All done. Your deposit will be available April 30. Hang on to your check until you get an email saying it posted. Then, void it.

ING Direct did send an email notification to say that my submission was successful, but this notification did not indicate that the funds were posted. For this, I’ll need to wait for a later email. I’ll update this article once I receive the email to indicate how long it takes to post $10. I checked my account online immediately after completing the deposit, and this appeared in my transaction history:

ING Direct Deposit

Notice how the total “Amount” is zero; the $10 is not available for me to use yet.

How to deposit checks without a cameraphone

The above process depends on having a mobile device with a camera and an internet connection. Not everyone has a smartphone or web-enabled, camera-equipped tablet. I didn’t see it at first, but ING Direct provides an option to remotely deposit checks without a camera. After you endorse your check for deposit, take a photograph using a digital camera of the front and back of your check. You could also use a scanner. Save the front and back as two separate JPG images. Access your account online, and click on “Image Upload” under the “Transfers & Deposits” heading. The website will take you through a process similar to the above.

Overall, whether using a mobile phone or your computer, depositing a check with ING Direct is now a simple and convenient process. If receiving checks is still a part of your life, and you’re looking for a way to exclude high-cost local banks from your personal finance system in favor of online banks like ING Direct, remote deposit is a necessity. ING Direct has made good on their promise to offer this service to their users.

Hat tip to Daniel from Sweating the Big Stuff and many others, including the bank itself, who brought the news to my attention.

{ 17 comments }

The more money you have, the more likely you are to cheat on your taxes. The rich have more opportunities to try to hide assets and income from the Internal Revenue Service, particularly through offshore bank accounts. In the United States, banks are required to report income earned by their customers on savings and investments. Many taxpayers are familiar with the 1099-INT and 1099-DIV forms for interest earned and dividends respectively. The I.R.S. can somewhat easily match the 1099 forms provided by banks with the 1040 income tax return forms filed by taxpayers to find discrepancies.

Banks located outside the United States, depending on their local laws, may not be required to provide this information fully to the United States government. Thus, the I.R.S. might not know if a taxpayer is earning money in an offshore account, making it easy to “forget” to include that income when filing taxes. Of course, this is fraud, and a bad idea.

The government is getting better at convincing banks located in tax havens to comply with I.R.S. requests for information about customers who happen to be taxpaying citizens of the United States. UBS, the largest bank in Switzerland, has ended its offshore “secret” banking service in Switzerland as a result of a settlement of a federal investigation. And this year, the I.R.S. is requiring certain taxpayers to file a new tax form, Form 8938, disclosing offshore assets and income.

Here are the certain taxpayers who must file this form:

  • Unmarried taxpayers or married taxpayers filing separately living in the United States whose total offshore assets at the end of the year total at least $50,000 or whose offshore assets exceeded $75,000 any time during the year. Married taxpayers filing jointly living in the United States have thresholds that are double the amounts for unmarried taxpayers.
  • Taxpayers living abroad whose total offshore assets at the end of the year total at least $200,000 or whose offshore assets exceeded $300,000 any time during the year.

Taxpayers who are otherwise not required to file an income tax return are not required to complete this form, either. The guidelines for determining who must file Form 8938 and which assets to report can be a bit complicated, so it’s best to read the rules from the I.R.S. and speak to an accountant familiar with the new law for advice.

The penalties for incorrect information of Form 8938 are steep, and even small errors can result in significant fines. Failure to file the form when required to do so can result in a penalty of $10,000, and if you continue to ignore requests from the I.R.S. to file, the penalty can reach $50,000. Even if you live offshore and your country has a law preventing you from disclosing your financial information to the United States, you can’t avoid the reporting requirement and penalties. If you file the form but underpay your taxes even due to an error on Form 8938, you will be charged a penalty of 40 percent of your underpayment.

If the government can show you committed fraud in underpaying your tax, the penalty will increase from 40 percent to 75 percent of your underpayment. Those penalties are additional to paying what you do owe, according to the I.R.S., plus interest.

The I.R.S. is also threatening criminal penalties for taxpayers who fail to file Form 8938, fail to disclose all offshore assets, or underpay their taxes.

If you look at Form 8938, you will see that reporting requirements for offshore assets and income are different than requirements related domestic bank accounts and investments. In general, you only need to report income from domestic bank accounts and investments, but with offshore accounts, the I.R.S. wants to know the value of your assets, not just your income.

As David Jolly points out in The New York Times, the information you report to the I.R.S. on Form 8938 duplicates a separate reporting requirement. Taxpayers who have more than $10,000 in offshore bank accounts must already file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR). The FBAR is used by the United States Treasury to identify money laundering and terrorism funding, so the I.R.S. is already receiving some of the information it needs. Form 8938 ties this information to taxpayers’ income tax returns. If the government decides to use the information filed on the FBAR to cross-check the information included on Form 8938, it could potentially identify more income tax evaders.

New York Times

{ 7 comments }

At the height of the recession, President George W. Bush and the congress authorized a bail-out of banks and investment companies headed for failure.

In a similar plan to bail out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government authorized the Treasury moved forward with the plan to stabilize the financial industry, and to an extent the economy. The Treasury purchased $225 billion in mortgage-backed securities insured by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

These securities were considered toxic because investors believed that the underlying mortgages were risky, and the price on the open market did not reflect that risk. When investment banks couldn’t get rid of these bad products on the open market, the Treasury stepped in and paid a discount to acquire the assets. This helped the investment banks pad their balance sheet with more cash, improving their financial conditions, avoiding bankruptcy or failure, alleviating to some degree panic in the market that could have led to a more damaging recession or economic depression.

One year ago, the Treasury began selling these mortgage-backed securities, and as of today, the government no longer has any of the assets purchased under this bailout plan. Not only that, but the Treasury earned $25 billion on its $225 billion investment. That works out to a total return of about 11 percent over about three and a half years (the purchases began in October 2008), though that doesn’t take into account the timing of the buying and selling transactions. The good news is that the Treasury did not lose money on toxic assets, a legitimate concern at the time.

The concern is not over, however. The quality of the underlying mortgages is still in question. The investments could still fail.

… [I]f the mortgages behind those securities fail, taxpayers will still be on the hook, since federal housing giants guarantee the loans and taxpayers have been propping up Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The $25 billion earned through the bail-out of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will go to paying down government debt.

Photo: cliff1066
CNN

{ 5 comments }

Preservation of capital is an important aspect of any financial plan, but in today’s economy, this is impossible without taking on some risk. At one time, you could confidently place any money you might need within one year in a high-yield savings account and be relatively confident that your money could buy at least as much a year in the future than it could buy the day you deposited your funds. Interest rates were relatively coordinated with the rate of inflation.

That’s not the case today. The Department of Labor released the latest inflation data. It should be no surprise to most consumers that the changes in the price of gas led to an increase in the energy index of 3.2 percent over the last twelve months (ending February). The inflation rate for all items is 2.9 percent. While the government-reported inflation rate doesn’t translate to the actual increase in expenses any one individual experiences year over year, it’s the best benchmark we currently have for a generalized view of the increase in prices.

And it’s the measure we use to determine how much purchasing power savers lose. If your savings account isn’t earning at least 2.9 percent after tax, you’re losing money in real terms by placing it in a bank. With banks offering less than 1 percent interest before taxes on their best high-yield savings accounts, purchasing power losses accelerate. Placing your cash under a mattress to earn zero interest is a worse idea, so are there any other options providing a safe way to maintain purchasing power?

Money BagsNot really. Using a savings account is great for funds you might need in an emergency, because you can access the money quickly without worrying about selling an asset. Savers have to understand that having an emergency fund is a compromise; in return for the safety of an FDIC-insured account, savers waive the right to preserve real value, at least in today’s economy.

Any other options for preserving capital introduce risk.

  • Investing in the stock market. Despite some recent frenzy about the stock market, with prices of the major indexes reaching near-term highs and day-over-day increases exceeding the best-performing day of the year thus far, there have also been daily price decreases reflecting the worst performance of the year. The stock market is incredibly volatile. For the long-term, it’s a good place to be, but there’s no guarantee that your capital will be preserved for when you need it.
  • Buying real estate. For years, families saw the house they live in as a way to store their wealth. The belief was unfortunately based on the myth that real estate values never decrease. Well, any asset can find itself in a bubble, whether they be tulips, stocks, or houses, and people who relied on real estate’s ever-increasing value to make a living have had a difficult time in recent years. It’s been terrible news for real estate flippers, but the effects hit single-house homeowners just as hard.

    Although timing the market is always dangerous, with low prices and low interest rates, if you can qualify and if the time is right for your family, now could be the right time to buy a house, particularly if you’re looking to live there for a long time.

  • Buying Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS). You can buy this investment product directly from the U.S. Treasury. Twice a year, you receive interest as well as an adjustment to your principal balance based on the inflation rate. This is basically a bond that will only lose value in the event of deflation. If you must sell TIPS after the value has dipped below your initial investment, you will still receive your full initial investment back.

    There’s no risk in losing money, and this is the closest you might be able to get to true preservation of capital during inflation. Keep in mind, however, that the government’s reported inflation value doesn’t necessarily reflect any one household’s experienced rate of inflation. The government’s rate used for calculating TIPS adjustments, the CPI-U, uses the prices of a combination of goods that weights items in a way that might not be relevant to most consumers.

  • Buying gold. Investing in gold is traditionally a good way to hedge against inflation, but the price of gold fluctuates. Like all commodities, the value of gold at any particular time is subject to the whims of commodities traders. An investment in gold is not as stable as its reputation. The price fluctuation may be due to fluctuations in the value of the dollar or of any other fiat currency, but the cause is irrelevant because the U.S. dollar is the world’s standard for currency, and if that ever changes, it would be another currency or combination of currencies that becomes the standard, not a commodity like gold. The days of the gold standard are over.

    Furthermore, most people who invest in gold use ETFs or mutual funds due to convenience. It would be inefficient and expensive to store and secure a significant amount of physical gold bars. Once you are dealing with electronic trades rather than a physical manifestation of metal, you’re subjecting yourself even more to the whim of the financial industry.

With low interest rates and increasing inflation, this may be a good time, from a financial perspective, to borrow money. You can do more with someone else’s money, repaying the loan with money valued less in the future. Borrowing money is of course not a good idea for people who could find themselves in trouble with debt, as interest costs could spiral out of control, but if you look at the numbers, borrowers are getting a much better deal, relatively speaking, than savers.

In today’s economy, if you are preserving your money, how are you doing so?

Photo: Lord Jim

{ 19 comments }

Harry Browne’s Permanent Portfolio

by Jacob

This is a guest article by Jacob, creator of the personal finance blog, My Personal Finance Journey. In the article, Jacob analyzes the Permanent Portfolio, a theory presented by Harry Browne, to determine whether investing along the theory’s guidelines can help investors beat the stock market. Investors in general always seem to be on the ... Continue reading this article…

20 comments Read the full article →

Buying a House With Cold, Hard Cash

by Flexo
Cash

When I write about the unbanked, the vast majority of this category of consumer avoids the financial industry due to lack of trust in the industry or a belief that living paycheck to paycheck doesn’t necessitate the fees and hassles of including a third party in financial transactions. Cash, in some respects, keeps you off ... Continue reading this article…

29 comments Read the full article →

$362,000 in Income: Not That Much for Mitt Romney

by Flexo

It’s no surprise that politicians have difficulty relating to their constituents. When Mitt Romney was asked about his finances, he admitted two facts that would sound strange to most listeners. Romney considers what he earned from speaking fees in one year, $362,000, as “not that much.” Like most individuals who earn most of their income ... Continue reading this article…

37 comments Read the full article →

More Homeowners Can Refinance

by Flexo

Thanks to some changes to the federal Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP), more homeowners can qualify for government-endorsed refinancing. Previously, the program only offered refinancing options for households where the mortgage value was up to 97 percent through 125 percent of the home’s market value. This did help families who have become underwater, having more left to ... Continue reading this article…

5 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 1112345···Last »