As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: unclaimed

The Adoption Tax Credit

This article was written by in Taxes. 26 comments.

For the first time ever, the adoption tax credit is refundable. This is a great change for parents who have adopted children in the past few years, because it means they could file their 2010 taxes and receive a bigger-than-expected refund. Keep in mind that refundable is a good thing when it comes to taxes; it means that even if you don’t owe any additional money to the government otherwise, the credit can make your liability less than zero. The government will owe you money, and you’ll receive a refund check. Here’s a deeper explanation of refundable tax credits.

If you’ve had adoption-related expenses, you can receive a tax credit, which reduces the amount you owe the government dollar for dollar. For the 2010 tax year, parents can receive as much as $13,170 per adopted child. The adoption credit lets you carry forward unclaimed expenses from the five previous years, as well. If you’ve paid more than the maximum in 2009 and claimed the maximum that year, you could claim the excess 2009 expenses for the same child on your 2010 tax return as long as the total claimed for each child does not exceed the maximum.

With the capability of receiving a larger refund due to the refundability of the adoption tax credit, the IRS has increased its requirements for documentation of the adoption. To qualify, taxpayers must complete Form 8839 and include additional paperwork.

While the U.S. tax system is designed for wealth distribution as well as raising money for governmental operations, the existence of refundable credits puts a spotlight on the more controversial aspect of the IRS. Additionally, the adoption tax credit is phased out at an adjusted gross income of $182,520 for 2010. This is a high maximum and will not disqualify most families who adopt children, but it means that the credit exists to help middle and low income families meet the needs of their children.

TurboTax - Do your taxes for Free - It's Easy

When it comes to the children’s needs, adopted children classified as “special needs” enable the parents to qualify for the entire credit, even if the family did not pay expenses that reach the total of $13,170 per child. In practice, adoption expenses tend to exceed tens of thousands of dollars, so even the maximum refund does not fully reimburse a family for an adoption.

As a result of the changes this year, a family earning a gross income of $39,000 in 2010 determined that the IRS will be paying them a $54,000 tax refund this year. This family has adopted five children over the course of three years. I could certainly argue that supporting the needs of five children on a $39,000 salary is going to be a challenge, but families manage to make it work.

I’m surprised that this family, as interviewed in CNN Money, did not recognize that their $54,000 windfall would be a perfect candidate for starting a college fund or replenishing savings accounts. The family is free to do whatever they like with a tax refund, but considering the needs of their adopted children might have been a good choice for a priority rather than a vacation. To be fair, I’m not in their shoes, so I don’t know what their needs are. The mother of the family indicates she does want to spend the money wisely, but anyone else receiving this credit should probably consider saving as well as spending.

If you file your taxes online using TurboTax or H&R Block, both of which offer free federal tax filing, the software will guide you through claiming the adoption credit. Meeting with a tax professional in person will be helpful, as well, to ensure you’ve claimed all that you can qualify for.

This credit will be refundable on 2011 tax returns as well, so any family adopting a child will benefit from the more generous tax law as well. Regardless, adopting children for the sole purpose of receiving a tax credit isn’t something I’d recommend.

CNN Money

{ 26 comments }

The Myth of Ownership

This article was written by in Consumer. 23 comments.

Who really owns all of your stuff? It’s comforting to think that everything that we have in our possession, acquired by legal means, belongs to us. That’s not always the way it works, however.

The myth of ownership is expected to apply to people who buy their possessions with credit and can’t afford to keep up with the debt payments. Default on your car loans, and the bank will come and repossess the car — that the bank owns, not the driver. Ignore your mortgage payments for long enough, and the bank will foreclose on your house. The typical American dream of owning a piece of property is rarely achieved because so few families truly own their homes.

Putting aside debt, there are situations when even full ownership doesn’t guarantee you can keep what is yours. The myth of ownership applies even when no debt is involved.

The first example is the process of escheatment by your state. Property considered abandoned can be claimed by the state in which you live or in which the property resides. Savings accounts and insurance policies are some of the more common financial items escheated. If a bank or insurance company can’t contact the owner, they will hand over the funds to the state.

The owner has a chance to recover the funds from the state, but it involves a process initiated by the owner who may not even be aware that the property exists. If you think there might be something of yours out there, start the process here. Most unclaimed property will remain unclaimed — and the states count on this when they plan their budgets and spending plans.

The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that states can exercise eminent domain in any situation where the state can prove that doing so would provide an economic benefit, and states can transfer that power to a private entity to exercise on its behalf. The result is that even homeowners who have no debt could find that the state will encourage them to leave. The state would offer reimbursement, but would act without the owner’s consent. Traditionally, highways and utilities are the reasons cited for seizure through eminent domain, but in the current legal environment, homes could be seized to make way for malls and sports arenas.

Eminent domain is one of the biggest examples of how our property doesn’t necessarily belong to us. On a smaller scale, New Jersey is now going after unused gift cards. Merchants and gift card issuers like Visa and American Express love unused gift cards. They’ve received the cash and haven’t had to provide any product. They have the most to lose by the state’s legislative decision to require issuers to forfeit the balance on unused cards after a relatively short time period. This decision was overturned in court, but the state is appealing that decision.

When our property can be relatively easily be taken from us by the state, is it really our property?

Hat tip: Darwin’s Money

{ 23 comments }

The state will take your money if you’re not vigilant. I received a warning the other day that I’m in danger of having the funds in one of my savings accounts handed over to the state of New Jersey. I’ll explain why in a moment.

First, I should explain that rather than keeping a simplified financial situation like the one I praise in Seven Zen Principles to Guide Your Money and Your Life, I have savings accounts at fourteen different banks. (I took a minute to count them for verification.) My balance sheet is this long because I open accounts somewhat compulsively to audition and review them on Consumerism Commentary. Therefore, my situation shouldn’t be common. I would say most people have savings accounts at only one or two banks.

With fourteen accounts, even if they are listed and updated frequently in Quicken, it can be difficult to manage your money. If you don’t move money around in each account, the bank is required to turn your cash over to the state, a process called escheatment. The rules are different in each state, but in my state of New Jersey, accounts I own are considered inactive or dormant after a period of two years with no activity.

Earning and receiving interest every month isn’t considered activity. Interest credits have been the only line items in my E*TRADE bank account since I opened it in January 2009. The bank is required to inform me that my account will be released to the state in six months unless I initiate a transaction. I received a letter from E*TRADE the other day stating that.

Since there has been no activity in your account(s) listed above for at least six months, the account(s) has/have been classified as inactive. After 24 months, inactive accounts will be considered dormant. As stated in our Account Agreement, if any of your E*TRADE accounts remain dormant for a specified period of time (as determined by each state), we may be required by law to turn over any funds in your account(s) to the state.

I remedied the problem quickly by transferring a good portion of my money in this account back to my very active electronic checking account at ING Direct. If I were to take no action by next January, E*TRADE would forward my cash to the state as abandoned property. At that point, I could go through the process of claiming the money, but it would be a hassle.

Savings accounts are not the only types of property that can be escheated. Any property where the holder can’t get in touch with the owner is fair game. That includes brokerage accounts, savings accounts, and checking accounts that have been inactive, as well as real property, safety deposit boxes, and insurance policies.

Even an automated monthly transfer doesn’t stop an account from becoming inactive for the purposes of escheatment, so monitor your accounts.

{ 0 comments }

Several years ago, the Citi Dividend Platinum Select MasterCard was a great credit card to use for the spending you would have done anyway. At that time, you could earn 5% cash back on all your purchases. For a time, I was able to charge my rent payments to the credit card. That’s a dangerous proposition for some people, but if you pay the bill in full every month, all you see are benefits.

After some time earning some of the best cash back rewards available, Citi began converting many of the Dividend Platinum Select MasterCards to Dividend World MasterCards. “World” may mean nothing more that the cards have “PayPass” enabled. PayPass is a technology that includes an embedded radio transmitter (RFID) inside the plastic, so rather than scanning the strip — or even using a manual scanner to imprint the raised card number on a slip through carbon paper — users can magically wave their card in front of a reader that activates the chip and receives the card information through an encrypted radio signal.

From MasterCard’s point of view, they can charge merchants a higher interchange fee for accepting these cards. Citi, on the other hand, was paying out too much money in cash back rewards, so they eventually reduced the benefit from 5% cash back to 2% on select purchases and 1% on all other purchases.

The Great Rebate Shrink hasn’t ended. While cardholders of the Dividend World MasterCard like myself will continue to earn 1% on all purchases, 2% cash back or more will be earned from different categories every three months and will require enrollment every time the categories change.

Though you can currently request your rebate check at any time when you have accumulated at least $50 in cash back, starting July 1, 2010, checks will only be sent in increments of $50, increasing the chances you will eventually leave some cash unclaimed.

For the World MasterCard, the first categories earning extra cash back will earn 5%, undoubtedly higher than usual to encourage people to be excited about the program at first. The qualifying categories for this extra cash back are restaurants, car rentals, and hotels.

It may be worthwhile to use this card specifically for the varying categories earning the higher rate each quarter, but when the novelty wears off it may be easy to forget to enroll.

I received this bit of bad news in the mail today, but I also received some possible good news. I’ll share that notification tomorrow.

{ 30 comments }

The $155 That Almost Wasn’t

by Smithee

It was only back in April that Flexo wrote about MissingMoney.com. I had heard about it once before through a friend on Twitter who said he’d had some success and so I figured, “What have I got to lose?” They don’t charge anything, it’s just a convenient way to get at some abandoned money that ... Continue reading this article…

4 comments Read the full article →

50 Tips to Help Establish Your Emergency Fund

by Flexo

One of the first steps to cleaning up one’s financial situation before embarking on the journey to become financially independent is the establishment of an emergency fund. An emergency fund, in its most basic form, is an accessible savings account where you keep cash for true emergencies, like the loss of a job or a ... Continue reading this article…

12 comments Read the full article →

Missing Money: Troll the Web for Abandoned and Unclaimed Property Owed to You

by Flexo

The company I work for “found” several million dollars last year thanks to a common law that originated in feudal England to the benefit the King. Not every check that a company sends in the mail gets cashed. Supposed recipients, such as investors, employees, insurance beneficiaries, companies, and other customers, don’t always keep current addresses ... Continue reading this article…

7 comments Read the full article →

11 Best Deals for Spring Shopping

by Flexo

Spring is obviously not the best time to shop for shorts, swimwear, and sandals. Retailers know that they can sell these items for much more than they could other times of the year. Other items can be found at great prices, according to Smart Money Magazine. These products aren’t for everyone, and some seem to ... Continue reading this article…

1 comment Read the full article →
Page 1 of 212