<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling a Car While Upside-Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 14:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Special Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/comment-page-1/#comment-59507</link>
		<dc:creator>Special Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/27/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/#comment-59507</guid>
		<description>&gt;Consider Ã¢â‚¬Å“GAPÃ¢â‚¬Â? insurance. While that stands for Ã¢â‚¬Å“Guaranteed Auto Protection,Ã¢â‚¬Â? itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s designed to help fill the Ã¢â‚¬Å“gapÃ¢â‚¬Â? in value if you must sell while upside-down.

GAP insurance will not help you when selling an &quot;upside-down&quot; vehicle.  This insurance is to cover the entire cost of an upside-down vehicle that has been totalled in a wreck.  

Example:
You owe $23,000 on a car that is worth $20,000 and you have full coverage in case of accidents.  If you total your car, the insurance will pay you what the car is worth ($20,000), not what you owe($23,000).  The gap insurance is designed to pay that $3000 gap in your full coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Consider Ã¢â‚¬Å“GAPÃ¢â‚¬Â? insurance. While that stands for Ã¢â‚¬Å“Guaranteed Auto Protection,Ã¢â‚¬Â? itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s designed to help fill the Ã¢â‚¬Å“gapÃ¢â‚¬Â? in value if you must sell while upside-down.</p>
<p>GAP insurance will not help you when selling an &#8220;upside-down&#8221; vehicle.  This insurance is to cover the entire cost of an upside-down vehicle that has been totalled in a wreck.  </p>
<p>Example:<br />
You owe $23,000 on a car that is worth $20,000 and you have full coverage in case of accidents.  If you total your car, the insurance will pay you what the car is worth ($20,000), not what you owe($23,000).  The gap insurance is designed to pay that $3000 gap in your full coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foobarista</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/comment-page-1/#comment-32771</link>
		<dc:creator>Foobarista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 21:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/27/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/#comment-32771</guid>
		<description>Not to be a pedant, but you _do_ legally own the car in the legal sense that ownership means you have exclusive use of the property, etc.  The dealership can&#039;t decide to let the dealer&#039;s kid take your car out for the weekend or whatever.

If you use a loan to buy a car (or house, etc), it has a lien on it for the amount of the balance due on the note, and your ownership rights are bound by any other terms in the note.  Unless you buy your car through an explicit &quot;rent to own&quot; arrangement, you own the car as soon as you sign the purchase agreement.

The reason I don&#039;t like muddying &quot;ownership&quot; discussions in this way is because some people  have been known to exploit this type of &quot;non-ownership&quot; argument to extort terms out of people that they wouldn&#039;t get otherwise.  You don&#039;t see this as much with cars but you do see it with people trying to buy houses from people in over their head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be a pedant, but you _do_ legally own the car in the legal sense that ownership means you have exclusive use of the property, etc.  The dealership can&#8217;t decide to let the dealer&#8217;s kid take your car out for the weekend or whatever.</p>
<p>If you use a loan to buy a car (or house, etc), it has a lien on it for the amount of the balance due on the note, and your ownership rights are bound by any other terms in the note.  Unless you buy your car through an explicit &#8220;rent to own&#8221; arrangement, you own the car as soon as you sign the purchase agreement.</p>
<p>The reason I don&#8217;t like muddying &#8220;ownership&#8221; discussions in this way is because some people  have been known to exploit this type of &#8220;non-ownership&#8221; argument to extort terms out of people that they wouldn&#8217;t get otherwise.  You don&#8217;t see this as much with cars but you do see it with people trying to buy houses from people in over their head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koontz</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/comment-page-1/#comment-31254</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koontz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/27/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/#comment-31254</guid>
		<description>NADA may be better for dealers, but most private sales still look at Kelley.  I just sold a car for a mere $300 less than Kelley Blue Book excellent condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NADA may be better for dealers, but most private sales still look at Kelley.  I just sold a car for a mere $300 less than Kelley Blue Book excellent condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/comment-page-1/#comment-31212</link>
		<dc:creator>mapgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/27/selling-a-car-while-upside-down/#comment-31212</guid>
		<description>Not to hijack your post, but the NADA Guides offer a better price for sellers than Kelley Blue Book. I&#039;m not sure how it compares to Edmunds, but a dealer will usually honor the NADA price since, NADA are the dealers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to hijack your post, but the NADA Guides offer a better price for sellers than Kelley Blue Book. I&#8217;m not sure how it compares to Edmunds, but a dealer will usually honor the NADA price since, NADA are the dealers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 9/15 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 432/432 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-05-27 16:01:30 -->
