As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Posts tagged as:

citi

Is it ironic that Citi, a bank on the brink of disaster, is now marketing a credit card that “rewards” card holders for good financial behavior? This new credit card marketed toward Generation Y and teenagers, Citi Forward (and Citi Forward for College Students), offers benefits such as 100 points for paying on time and staying within your credit limit each month, 5 points for each $1 spent in “responsible” categories such as books, movies, music, and restaurants, 1 point per $1 for all other purchases, and 5,000 bonus points for signing up for paperless statements.

The most attractive feature is a quarterly reduction of APR by 0.25 percentage points after 3 months of making a purchase and staying within your credit limit and paying on time. This reduction is limited to eight in total and will only be applied if you continue to make purchases using the card.

Why is Citi taking this approach? The company surveyed 1,000 consumers and found:

76% of [survey respondents] said they would rather learn by being rewarded for the right things they do, rather than learning from their mistakes.

I seem to remember a college professor explaining that positive reinforcement is more effective over punishment when your goal is to change someone’s behavior. But don’t get the wrong idea, Citi card holders will certainly be punished if they make a mistake. The default interest rate — immediately charged if the card holder misses a payment — is 29.99%.

The points rewarded must be redeemed through Citi’s ThankYou network, which does not have a one-to-one relationship between points and cents, as the previous credit cards offering cash back rewards had. You would need to accumulate 16,000 points to qualify for a $100 cash reward. If you want a better “exchange rate,” you need to spend or donate your points.

It’s clear that the “responsible” categories for which Citi would like to “reward” its customers are not those that encourage good behavior. If Citi wanted to encourage financial responsibility, they would be promoting the use of libraries rather than purchasing books and buying groceries and cooking implements rather than dining at restaurants. I happen to be a fan of movies and music, but these are two categories where strapped consumers may wish to cut back spending in this recessionary economy. Furthermore, Citi claims that rewarding customers for choosing paperless statements is based on the idea that saving the environment is good, but I think even the targeted teenagers understand that it costs Citi a significant sum to send paper statements in the mail.

The 0.25 percentage point reduction in APR is a good start, but if Citi wanted to encourage true financial competence, they would reward customers for paying bills in full each month.

What do you think about Citibank’s latest credit card?

{ 9 comments }



Thank you to all the taxpayers who are footing the bill for this. As Citibank continues to receive money from the government of the United States, funded by investors in Treasury bills and citizens of the future who will be paying more to the government to support the interest payments on that debt, Citibank continues to reward me. Rather than making new loans to businesses or individuals in needs, Citi simply raises credit card limits.

The concept is somewhat sound; raise credit limits and people will spend more, helping Citi with interest fees and helping the economy through more consumer activity. But if they’re raising the limit for people like me, there is no effect other than using bailout money to prop up their balance sheet.

I have never spent anywhere close to my credit limit in any one month. Yet, they targeted me as a candidate for an increase. I won’t decline the increase; a higher limit results in a lower utilization ratio, which will most likely lead to a higher credit score.

Here is their personal announcement to me:

YOUR ACCOUNT: CREDIT LINE INCREASE

Congratulations on Your Recent Credit Line Increase.

Dear (Flexo),

Because you are one of our loyal customers, we wanted to give your Citi® Card even more value. So reward yourself with the spending power and flexibility that comes with a higher line of credit.

You’ve earned it. Now enjoy it.

Use your new line of credit to transfer balances: You may qualify for a great rate on a balance transfer. To see what offers may be available to you, visit balancetransfer.citicards.com.

Wow, I feel so special. I earned it!

Clearly, Citi is hoping I will transfer a balance from another card, taking advantage of a 3.99% APR and 3% balance transfer fee. Even if I had a balance to transfer, I would pass. This credit limit increase would have been better spent by Citigroup elsewhere.

{ 10 comments }



Citigroup released a report today explaining how it “spent” the $45 billion provided to the company by the government as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). On a high level, the report accounts for $46.5 billion spent or allocated to a variety of programs across five categories: residential mortgages, personal and business loans, student loans, credit cards, and corporate loans.

First, $10 billion was used to purchase mortgage bundles from Fannie Mae. The bundles mature this month, which means Citi will receive the $10 billion back and be able to use the funds elsewhere. The report says that this decision was to “help provide liquidity to the secondary market.”

$10 billion is being used to invest directly in mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Half of this amount is invested in 15-year fixed rate mortgages while the other half is invested in split between 3-year and 5-year adjustable rate mortgages.

$7.5 billion is being used to buy other mortgages on the secondary market; that is, Citi is buying mortgages offered by other lenders from those other lenders.

$8.2 billion is being used to offer non-conforming mortgages directly to consumers. Non-conforming loans are those with high values, starting at an average of about $500,000, usually necessary in areas with high property values. Interest rates on these loans are higher and so are the risks associated with offering these mortgages.

$1 billion is earmarked for loans to businesses facing short-term financial problems. These loans would be secured by commercial property of illiquid assets.

$1.5 billion is being offered to consumers who would like to consolidate personal debts or who need money to meet other financial obligations.

$1 billion will offered to students as loans through the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) to help middle income and low income families afford tuition.

$5.8 billion is earmarked for credit cards in order to expand offers for balance transfers, increase credit lines, and acquire new customers. In the statement, Citigroup says, “Credit cards play a critical role in helping people and businesses purchase basic goods and services. Based on available national economic figures, Citi estimates that 20 percent of total personal spending flows through credit card transactions, often for everyday essentials.”

$1.5 billion is being invested in securities backed by commercial loans.

The above amounts are earmarks. Citi did not describe in detail amounts that have already been invested or used vs. amounts that are waiting to be spent at the right time, for example, when there is sufficient liquidity or supply.

Citigroup also offered a description of permitted uses and prohibited uses for money provided by the government. Here is what is permitted:

Citi’s guidelines call for TARP capital to be deployed in a prudent and disciplined manner consistent with Citi’s strategic objectives and the Treasury’s goal of strengthening the financial system in the United States and expanding the flow of credit. TARP capital is equity, in the form of preferred stock. It will be used exclusively to support investments and not for expenses, which are covered as part of our cash flow.

And here is what is not permitted for the TARP funds:

TARP capital may not be used for any of the following purposes: Compensation or bonuses, dividend payments, lobbying or government relations activities, marketing, or advertising or corporate sponsorship activities. TARP capital will not be used for any purposes other than those expressly approved by Citi’s Special Committee.

Accountability and transparency is necessary so consumers can understand how the funds approved by government representatives to bail out financial instituions are being used. I’m happy to read that Citi’s TARP funds are not going to bonuses and executive compensation, but is this the most effective use of the money? I would like to see more funds set aside for direct relief for consumers.

Here is the full 43-page report from Citigroup, called What Citi is Doing to Expand the Flow of Credit, Support Homeowners and Help the U.S. Economy: TARP Progress Report for Fourth Quarter 2008 [pdf], February 3, 2009.

{ 2 comments }

Reminder: While I am on vacation this week, Consumerism Commentary is featuring articles by other writers. Please read Criminal Charges: Volume XVII, the first of this week’s guest articles.

Rescue Deal for CitiGroup. Citi is too big to fail, so the government is preparing an injection of $20 billion in addition to the $25 billion the company has already received. GM, Ford, and Chrysler are quoted as whining, “It’s not fair!”

Wall Street versus Pennsylvania Avenue. According to the Presidential Cycle, the stock market loses ground during the first half of a new president’s term while increases significantly during the second half. Statistics prove this to be true, but here’s why you shouldn’t abandon stocks for two years.

Gift Cards: A Bad Idea Gets Even Worse. This is bad news for office Secret Santa exchanges. Now we’ll have to think about what trinket someone else may like.

180th Carnival of Personal Finance. Living Almost Large is hosting this edition of the Carnival of Personal Finance with pictures of foreign paper currency. In addition to the Editor’s Picks, check out Visualizing $10,000 Extra in Your Life, The Not-so-Easy Part of Personal Finance, and Financial Education in Schools.

{ 0 comments }

America’s 20 Best Health Plans. Unsurprisingly, my plan is not on this list from MSN and US News & World Report. The top award goes to Harvard Pilgrim Health Care of New England in Maine and Massachusetts. I should take advantage of my Aetna plan more by visiting a doctor for a check-up once in a while, particularly since the price of my plan is going up next year.

Aflac CEO Says He’ll Give Up Golden Parachute if Ousted. Aflac, which isn’t seeking bailout money from the government, would owe Dan Amos $13 million if a merger or acquisition results in the elimination of his job. Amos has graciously volunteered to give up this income if he leaves the company in these circumstances. He’s setting an example for other highly-paid CEOs who plan on taking windfall compensation even as their companies fail or ask the public for handouts.

76% Say Obama Can Fix Economy – Poll. No pressure, though. Meanwhile, Bush and 19 other world leaders from developed and developing countries are meeting in Washington to discuss the financial crisis. While expectations are probably too high for the meeting, it will be interesting to see if anything comes from it.

Citigroup to Lay Off Another 10,000 – Report. Even after Citi received $25 billion from the government, we can expect more lay offs and significantly higher interest rates on consumer credit cards.

For the “News and Blogs” features, which I plan to run almost daily as long as I have additional articles to share, I select some of the most interesting posts from my RSS reader and from pfblogs.org. If you don’t believe you blog is included on my RSS reader, please let me know to so I can add it. Thanks!

News and Blogs sponsor: FNBO Direct, currently offering 3.25% APY

{ 0 comments }

This would-be acquisition is turning into a mess. First Citi agreed to buy Wachovia’s deposits with the help of the FDIC. Wachovia accepted this deal under duress, apparently. The FDIC warned Wachovia that if they did not agree to the deal, the government would seize Wachovia’s deposits. That left Wachovia little choice but to accept.

Not much later, Wells Fargo stepped in with a better offer for Wachovia. This offer called for an acquisition of the entire operations of Wachovia, not just deposits, without the help of the government, for $15.1 billion in stock.

On Saturday, the FDIC succeeded in having the New York State Supreme Court block the deal between Wells Fargo and Wachovia, but on Sunday night, the ruling was overturned on appeal. Citi will appeal this decision.

It seems that the Wells Fargo deal is better for Wachovia, Wachovia’s shareholders, and the public. Wells Fargo will keep Wachovia intact and the FDIC will not be required to use taxpayer money to cover any losses. I don’t see any reason that anyone would favor the Citi deal.

{ 4 comments }

Although Wachovia was recently saved by Citi and the FDIC, Wells Fargo stepped into the picture with a better offer. In this deal, Wells Fargo would take on all of Wachovia, including deposits, brokerage, and investment management, for $15 billion. Earlier this week, Citi offered $2.2 for Wachovia’s banking operations only.

If the Wells Fargo deal goes through, and Citi will do everything in its power to attempt to stop that from happening, shareholders of Wachovia would receive about one-fifth a share in Wells Fargo for every share in Wachovia.

While Citi’s offer relied on the FDIC for financial assistance, Wells Fargo can go through with the transaction without help from the government. The FDIC, however, is in favor of the Citi’s deal.

The banking landscape continues to change.

{ 5 comments }

October 3 update: Wells Fargo has stepped in and placed a better offer for Wachovia.

Wachovia is my main brick-and-mortar bank. The bank has held my primary, though small, savings and checking accounts for about fifteen years. During this time, it hasn’t always been known as Wachovia to me due to a series of mergers and acquisitions. My accounts, which haven’t moved, were held at First Union National Bank, CoreStates National Bank, and New Jersey National Bank.

Soon, my bank will be Citibank. Citibank recently announced its plans to bail out Wachovia’s banking operations.

CitichoviaUntil now, I’ve managed to hold completely free accounts at Wachovia. While I’ve been charged fees for various reasons, perhaps mistakes on my part like allowing my savings account balance to dip below a minimum level, Wachovia has always refunded the charges. In fact, I’ve been quite happy with the bank’s customer service all around from the beginning.

If CitiBank does not offer a free option to correspond with my current Wachovia accounts once the acquisition and transition is complete, I will not hesitate to move my funds out of the bank. I have had some interesting experiences with CitiBank’s banking services — mostly on the business end — and I’m not anticipating the switch.

The new Wall Street Journal blog, The Wallet, has a couple of posts regarding the takeover that would be helpful to Wachovia customers like me, here and here. These are the major points:

  • Deposits insured by FDIC won’t be lost.
  • If you sell your Wachovia stock, which was at $3.50 per share as of last night, you can write off your losses against your stock gains for tax purposes.
  • Wachovia mortgages and student loans will become Citi’s assets along with bank accounts after December 31.

{ 1 comment }