As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Posts tagged as:

consumerism

I am not a very good baseball fan. I grew up with the Mets as the team of choice in my family although none of us were much into sports. This loyalty was solidified with the team’s World Series win in 1986 when I was ten years old, the prime age for baseball fandom. Now with a girlfriend who has lived her entire life practically next door to the Mets, I have returned to my old ways.

While remaining mostly cool, detached, and apathetic to baseball in general, I have to admit the sport is fun to watch. And that works for me because I don’t care about the losses; thus, I don’t get frustrated in what would normally, for a fan, be a very frustrating year.

The enjoyment of baseball relies on putting aside the fact that the sport — and perhaps all sports, or all forms of entertainment — is just a commercial. The baseball game is one long commercial for a variety of products and services. Every single aspect of the game is sponsored by a company that offers something for fans to buy. The true goal of these events which draw tens of thousands of spectators in person and millions via radio and television is not to entertain or enlighten. The true goal is to get you to part with your money.

And they do a very good job of this.

Last night, I attended a Mets game for the first time this year. The organization originally sold our seats to someone for $175 each. They came with wonderful, but expensive amenities, like access to a dining area. But we managed to save some money in some areas while missing others. Here are some things we did and some we could have done to save money at this Major League Baseball game, besides staying home and watching the game on television or listening on the radio.

Buy tickets secondhand. While our seats had a “face value” of $175, we waited until the last twenty-four hours to buy them through a second-hand ticket broker, StubHub. We saved almost $100 a ticket, paying what is much closer to what I believe to be a fair price for the experience. Our seats were excellent, a few rows behind the third base dugout. Fans are desperate to unload tickets they can’t use, so wait until the twenty-four hours leading up to the game and you’ll find better deals. These were likely someone’s season tickets, so they may not have paid full price either, but I do feel we got a good deal relative to what other seats cost.

Buy the cheapest seats. Every stadium has an option for the nosebleeds. With most games, you can buy the cheapest tickets but still find a way to see the game from a better location. There is usually an opportunity to move around, so don’t be afraid to perform a “manual upgrade” if you’re not infringing on anyone else’s enjoyment of the game and if you remain polite.

Citi Field, August 18, 2009

Take public transportation. We may be spoiled in New York. Public transportation to Mets and Yankees games is convenient. Parking at the stadium is an expensive hassle. I remember one time a few years ago it took two and a half hours just to get out of the Yankee Stadium parking garage onto the streets in the Bronx. Now I take the Long Island Rail Road to Mets games, and my girlfriend lives just blocks from a train station.

Bring your own drinks. For most fans, alcohol is part of the experience of being at a ball game. Alcohol must also be a way to cope with bad seats; in the past, I’ve noticed the worse our seats, the rowdier and drunker the surrounding fans. Anyhow, cut back the alcohol at the game and bring your own soda or water. Depending on the stadium, the security might let you bring in outside drinks or food.

Eat before and/or after the game. I tend to go into games hungry. This is a very bad idea for me, as I’m tempted to order and eat the junk food served at the stadium’s concession. Or even worse, if my seats include complimentary admission to one of the dining clubs, I might order food there. Either way, this food is very expensive. Consider a frugal tailgate at home before the game or in the parking lot and refrain from eating ballpark food.

Skip the souvenirs. Major League Baseball knows that the business of souvenirs is huge. Companies like New Era and Majestic Athletic pay significant licensing fees to the MLB in order to sell the “official” versions of sports merchandise, so they charge more for these “authentic” souvenirs. This is completely unnecessary for experiencing baseball.

Close your ears and eyes. Throughout the game, you are bombarded with marketing. There’s little you can do about this other than try to ignore it. Citi’s sponsorship of the Mets gave them naming rights on the stadium and all the ATMs are owned by Citibank. Pepsi has a significant presence at the stadium; its branding through signage is even larger than Citi’s and you won’t be able to find any Coca-Cola products at the game. Advertisers believe that the target audience for baseball is middle-aged men with greying hair; thus, Just For Men, a hair dyeing product, is featured prominently in the stadium and on broadcasts.

Anything that is featured, like the out-of-town scoreboard, the starting line-up, the call to the bullpen, or the play of the game, is attached to a sponsor. There is no way to escape this deluge of commercialism and fans have just grown to accept it. Even though you realize it exists, the association between baseball and these companies sticks consciously and subconsciously. I can guarantee that every one of these companies that sponsor a small piece of baseball has a counterpart that is just as effective or pleasant, but is less expensive because it doesn’t pay for massive sponsorship deals.

How do you save money at baseball games?

Photo: Flexo

{ 22 comments }



Seven years ago, when people I knew were buying houses they couldn’t afford with the philosophy that real estate prices always go up, and the go up fast, I was sitting on the sidelines. I had no money, no desire to settle down, and no belief that real estate in the form of home ownership was such a sure thing. Years later, I had a chance to see the real numbers behind the true cost of owning a house for 30 years, and I was not impressed. For all that people say about real estate appreciation, there is a lot you don’t hear about often.

To truly determine how much you earn on a house from the moment of purchase to the moment of sale, you can’t ignore all the maintenance costs and other fees you are required to pay in order to live in that home. Buying a house for $500,000 and selling for $600,000 two years later is not a real 20% return when you consider you spent $30,000 in taxes, $15,000 for a new patio, $10,000 for a remodeled kitchen, your closing costs when you purchased the house, and the Realtor’s commission when you sell. The home you live in barely beats inflation over the long term when you factor in all costs, unlike long-term investing in a broad selection of stocks like an S&P 500 index fund.

MP Dunleavey mentioned that more people are beginning to think the same way I have been thinking, and taking this approach much farther than I have. These “transumers” eschew ownership wherever possible in favor of a more transient existence, supported when necessary by renting and leasing. “Rather than spending your money on individual things, which you then have to keep (suddenly an old-fashioned idea), you purchase access to an array of objects and experiences. It can save time as well as cash: The more you own, the more you have to worry about, maintain and upgrade.”

Renting is often cheaper than owning, even over the long term.

When you count gas, maintenance, insurance, repairs, loan payments and depreciation, the average cost of car ownership is $8,095 a year, according to AAA. Yet the majority of cars in North America are driven only 66 minutes a day, according to a 2008 study by Susan Shaheen of the University of California, Berkeley. That works out to about $20 an hour, two to three times the hourly cost of car sharing.

I don’t think a service like Zipcar would work for me because most of my driving is my daily commute, but the transient lifestyle lends itself to leasing a car. Leasing usually includes a contract that is not favorable to the consumer, and most related financial advice warns to avoid leasing a car. But in cases where leasing is more expensive in the long run than buying, or you have no asset at the end of the contract, you could consider the increased cost the price you pay for not needing to deal with the pains, headaches, and expenses of owning the car.

Every time you add to your possessions, you add to your responsibility and in many cases your expenses. Rather than being tied down to material objects, you can spend your money on experiences or save for the future.

Why Own When You Can Rent?, MP Dunleavey, MSN Money, May 6, 2009

{ 16 comments }



When the doors opened early for Black Friday sales at a Wal-Mart store on Long Island, the frenzied shoppers stormed in, determined to be the first to grab the bargains before they were depleted. The maniacs trampled the unfortunate Wal-Mart worker whose job was to open the door. The shoppers continued to run in, ignoring the man on the ground. The New York Times described the scene:

The throng of Wal-Mart shoppers had been building all night, filling sidewalks and stretching across a vast parking lot at the Green Acres Mall in Valley Stream, N.Y. At 3:30 a.m., the Nassau County police had to be called in for crowd control, and an officer with a bullhorn pleaded for order…

By 4:55, with no police officers in sight, the crowd of more than 2,000 had become a rabble, and could be held back no longer. Fists banged and shoulders pressed on the sliding-glass double doors, which bowed in with the weight of the assault. Six to 10 workers inside tried to push back, but it was hopeless. Suddenly, witnesses and the police said, the doors shattered, and the shrieking mob surged through in a blind rush for holiday bargains.

At this point, Jdimytai Damour was trampled in the stampede and died, without shoppers stopping to help. When the police shut down the store, shoppers refused to leave.

Is shopping, while possibly saving a few dollars on a highly-publicized sale day, so important that it forces otherwise normal people to act like savages, literally killing each other to be first in line for the bargains? It sounds like this Wal-Mart location was inadequately protected with security appropriate for a mob scene, but it’s just a sale. This was not an angry mob, marching for a cause, ready to defend their movement to the death. Those who trampled this poor individual without any thought to his well-being should be arrested and charges with second degree manslaughter.

{ 13 comments }

Every so often, I present a question to Twitter to get a feel for opinions and ideas of Consumerism Commentary fans, readers, and friends. Yesterday, I asked whether you plan on spending more or less this holiday season than you did last year on gifts and other holiday expenses. With a troubling economy that doesn’t seem to be improving any time soon — just look at today’s unemployment numbers — the prevailing thought is that people are tightening their belts.

Since Twitter restricts responses to only a sentence or two, I also invited people to respond to the poll on the Consumerism Commentary Community (C3), a bulletin board that’s slowly getting off the ground.

Here are some responses.

  • dreamscostmoney: Wife and I decided to stop celebrating christmas altogether from now on. So, decidedly less.
  • conedude13: le$$!! See what i did there? clever, eh? :P
  • FinanceGirl: Spending less. Same value of items for everyone but me & husband, but getting stuff at better discounts & using RX transfer GCs.
  • bargainr: more! stimulate that economy!
  • rthornton: Plan to spend a little less. Driven more by desire to give smaller, more meaningful gifts than by state of economy
  • ToughMoneyLove: Spending less
  • nodebtplan: less, but not because of the economy. By choice – we’re giving gifts of experiences (doing stuff together, coming home for Christmas)
  • dgstinner: I plan on spending about the same for gifts during this year’s holiday season.
  • NickRac: Less – ONLY because I don’t have the girlfriend anymore!
  • brokegrad: More, because I’ve had a job this year as opposed to being a broke grad student like I was last year.
  • BurgBarbL: Probably about the same; I’ve managed to keep my overall spending in check, so feel OK about gifts
  • Anonymous: Probably less. Even though I’m making more money this year, it isn’t going as far, and I’m making a bigger effort to limit spending.

Many of the respondents plan on spending less this year, but not necessarily due to the economy. “Bargainr” (Jim from Blueprint for Financial Prosperity) is one of the few planning to spend more than last year, in what seems like an altrustic gesture to single-handedly save the retail economy.

On C3, That One Caveman says:

Much, much less, honestly. Our cash flow situation is pretty poor with all of our money going toward finishing our basement. I’ve allocated my blog’s income from the last month or so to cover at least a modest Christmas.

I consider those of us earning income from blogging, particularly as a “side stream,” pretty lucky in this economy. Without the income I earn from Consumerism Commentary and to a lesser extent a few other online projects, I would be in a very different financial situation.

Yana, a long-time Consumerism Commentary reader adds:

We’ll probably spend the same as last year, but we don’t do Christmas gift-giving or celebrations in general… I expect that due to the economy, there may be some especially great sales during or after the season. That could cause us to shop, if there is something we could use.

Stores are struggling in this economy, and some aren’t going to survive. Circuit City has already decided to close over 150 stores in the past week. I think there will be some great deals out there as stores work extra hard to get anyone to walk through the doors.

Follow me on Twitter to participate in future polls and join the Consumerism Commentary Community to discuss issues with other readers.

{ 10 comments }