Posts tagged as:

emergency fund

I’m pointing out a recent article featuring advice from Walter Updegrave, a senior editor of Money Magazine. Recently, he was asked to quantify the percentage of income that any individual should save in order for this particular action to be considered “financially responsible.” Normally, the advice I’ve seen suggests a rate somewhere between 10% and 20% of income, so I was expecting Updegrave’s advice to head in that direction.

Rather than providing a hard percentage, Updegrave took a more nuanced approach.

Well, as much as I’d like to be able to tell you to save 10%, 15% or whatever and you’ll be fine, it’s impossible for me to do that without knowing a whole lot more about you. The percentage of income that’s appropriate for you will depend on your income, age, the amount of money you’ve already saved, your employment prospects and, most important, how much you’re willing to forego immediate gratification for current and future financial security.

It is good to see writers admitting that personal finance advice is not one-size-fits-all rather than going for the knowledge-nugget. Knowledge-nuggets are like those chicken nuggets at that fast-food restaurant with the yellow double arch-shaped letter. They’re tasty, but not very healthy, and you get sick of them after about 25.

Every individual is surrounded by a unique situation, and that should be reflected in personal finance advice.

Tips on the other hand can be general enough to apply to a large swath of individuals. Updegrave answers the reader’s question as best as possible without knowing anything about the individual, but then leads into a few savings tips that are applicable to just about everyone: Start building an emergency fund (and here are 50 tips for building one), be serious about investing for retirement, and find additional ways to save such as automating your savings.

If nothing else, saving 10% of your income is a good start if you’re not saving anything, and saving 20% of your income is a good next step if you’re saving 10%.

3 steps to financial security: Save, save, save, Walter Updegrave, Money Magazine, April 30, 2009

{ 20 comments }



My goal was never to have all the money I could get my hands on.

On the other hand, I’ve never solidified my financial goals. Up to now, it’s mostly been about what I don’t want, rather than what I do:

  • I don’t want more rooms in my house than I can use
  • I don’t want to have to hire a security firm
  • I don’t want to go to fundraising dinners for politicians
  • I don’t want people around me who only like me for the luxury I share with them
  • I never want to do any “shmoozing”

It’s things like that which I’ve long associated with wealthy people. Maybe these are stereotypes that only happen in fiction, I couldn’t say. More realistically, I’ve only had one (not)goal for many years: I don’t want to be in danger of being homeless. That’s not a productive goal. I think it’s time I change my thinking.

Flexo has written about different types of goal-setting in the past, which helped me start germinating ideas subconsciously over the past few months. Here’s what I’ve got so far for my long-term goals:

  • I want moderate luxury: a perfect example of this is our living room TV. I bought a used HD projector ($900) and a cheap 92” screen for $75. I hung the screen myself for less than $10, and we’ve had an enormous gorgeous high-def TV for years. I don’t need a separate media room or surround sound. What we’ve got is great.
  • I want to eat breakfast outside: I want enough time in the morning to be able to make myself some eggs and bacon, coffee or tea, and take it to the backyard to enjoy. Usually this is only possible on vacation. I think in order to do this every day, I’d need to work from home.
  • I want my evenings and weekends to myself: I know too many people who think about, and perform, work during non-work hours. I’ve always felt this is indicative of a management flaw. The people at my current business tell me I work faster than anybody else, so that may also have something to do with it.
  • I want lots of open space: I’ve always lived in metropolitan areas, so I probably don’t have it in me to switch instantly to farming, but I like to think that by the time work slows down for us, we’ll at least have a kind of subsistence farm situation.

For many months, excluding one huge setback last fall, my only goal has been “get rid of the credit card debt”. I’m still going to do this, but a recent salary cut decided for me that my plan of paying off $1,000 a month won’t work anymore. After adjusting our budget, instead of $532 leftover per pay period, I have about $228. So, new plan: save the leftover salary money. It’ll either grow in a bank account, or go toward home improvements (including my wife’s increasingly impressive garden), or upcoming vacations. You know, things that improve the quality of life. Things that I’ve been ignoring for far too long.

And I’ll take half of whatever I earn from my freelance work to gradually pay down the pesky credit card. It’ll go a lot more slowly, but hopefully that will encourage me to do more, better work in my spare time. That will hopefully lead to a situation where I can work from home, in a place with lots of open space, and a backyard I can eat breakfast in.

{ 3 comments }



Being prepared for financial emergencies is a primary step on the path to creating and maintaining solid footing, but as with other good things, too much of a positive can be negative. Every individual’s or family’s situation is unique, so it’s difficult to prescribe a hard and fast rule about the right size of an emergency fund that applies to everyone. Having three to six months’ worth of expensive in accessible cash is a good start, but many people will find that this will be too much or not enough.

I’ve suggested taking a holistic view by breaking your emergency fund into five (six) levels including cash on hand, a high-yield savings account, sellable investments, available credit, friends and family, and possibly readiness to reduce expenses. These options range from stagnant to flexible in terms of what they allow you to do with your money. For example, if you keep a small amount of cash ready under your mattress to use if you can’t access your bank accounts, that money loses purchasing power due to inflation the longer it stays outside the financial system. High-yield savings account may match or exceed inflation and investments may beat inflation over time. Access to credit allows you to invest more while still providing an option to help during an emergency, and friends and family can occasionally be tapped if necessary without risking your credit (just your reputation).

As we travel further down the list, more of your money is freed to work for you, invested for the future. If you are comfortable with the latter options, and if you are experienced with credit and not in danger of falling into debt, it’s better to tilt your emergency plan in that direction. I wouldn’t recommend keeping more than one year’s worth of expenses in a savings account narrowly beating inflation if at all, and the more other options are available, like credit and other somewhat liquid investments, a tiered approach will allow you to have your assets work for you.

{ 8 comments }

This is timely information consider I wrote this morning about establishing a small emergency fund before taking on the task of accelerating debt payoff. Last week, Liz Pulliam Weston from MSN Money provided details from a summary of different savings studies over the past few years. I discovered this article today.

According to the survey results, having just $500 in the bank corresponded to a large difference in stress, quality of sleep, quality of health, and productivity. The study also shows that income level has nothing to do with this. In both low and moderate income households, the average income for households who have saved at least $500 were about the same as the income for those who had not.

Better health and greater productivity save money in the long run. Even if it doesn’t sound like a good idea to start an emergency fund before directing all of your excess income towards paying off debt on the surface thanks to evaporating savings interest rates, there are many ways a small cash cushion can pay off in the long run.

Want to sleep better? Save $500, Liz Pulliam Weston, MSN Money, March 12, 2009.
Understanding the Emergency Savings Needs of Low and Moderate Income Households [pdf], Stephen Brobeck, Consumerism Federation of America, November 2008.

{ 6 comments }

Taking the first few steps to ensure your future financial stability can be daunting. There is so much to do, trying to decide where to start can result in wasted time, and wasted time is wasted money. Eliminating debt is often the first priority, and rightly so. If debt is in the form of credit cards, interest payments could be a massive drag on finances. Credit card companies love offering low minimum payments because they know that consumers who pay only the minimum, and continue adding more debt, will be customers for life. How else could the system get away with taking $20,000 from a customer who purchased a computer worth $1,500?

If you are spending less than you earn, you have the capacity to divert your excess income to long-term savings, debt payments, and an emergency fund. You probably have a desire to put all of you excess income towards reducing that debt, and that’s understandable. Mathematically, that makes the most sense. Credit card interest could accrue at an annual rate of 9.9%, 14.9%, 29.9%, or even worse. It’s highly unlikely that your money can earn that much in any other safe investment over the long term, so paying off debt gives you the most bang for your buck. It’s simple math.

Simple math doesn’t always have the answer when it comes to your money. No, I am not advocating taking emotions into account. Doing what “feels right” isn’t the best option here. But the point is that there are more mathematics to weigh than just interest rates, and it’s the type of math that you can’t plug into online debt payment calculators.

I’ll explain. By diverting all of your excess money to debt repayment without beefing up your savings, you are taking a risk. You are betting that nothing will cause you to incur more debt during the payoff process. Even though your money in a savings account will not earn as much as the amount you’ll save by paying off debt, you have to take into account “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns.” As the chief financial officer (CFO) of your own life, you have to manage that risj in addition to counting dollars and cents in the bank.

People in corporations get paid lots of money to perform risk management, and if the current financial crisis teaches us anything, it’s that risk managers don’t always do their job perfectly. It is difficult when dealing with issues facing large corporations and industry leaders, but for most people who deal only with loans, credit card debt, future expenses, and investments, risk management can be boiled to its most basic form: have an emergency fund. How can this be applied to paying off debt? Is the emergency fund more important?

If you direct all your excess money to paying off debt, you are likely to fall back into debt the moment an emergency arises. If your water heater breaks and all your money has been directed to your credit cards, you will have to use a credit card again to pay for the repair. You’ve taken one step forward, but now you’re forced to take two, three or four steps backward.

My suggestion is to balance building an emergency fund with paying off debt. When you are ready to divert your excess income to improving your financial condition, start with defining two goals: pay off all of your debt without acquiring more and build a solid emergency fund, which depending on the economy and the market for your skills, might consist of three months’, six months’ or one year’s worth of expenses. Don’t know your monthly expenses? Track where your money is going first.

Start by funding a base for your emergency fund. Pay the minimum to your credit cards or other debt, don’t accrue new debt, and send any extra money to a high-yield savings account until you’ve built one month’s worth of expenses. This will allow you to mitigate some risk while paying down your debt.

Once you’ve reached a one-month buffer, start sending extra money to your credit card with the highest interest rate. I suggest allocating 75% of your excess funds to this first targeted credit card (using the Debt Avalanche method) and 25% to your emergency fund. Keep sending money to your emergency fund month after month until your savings account cushion reaches the goal set above.

Once that target is reached, 100% of your surplus can be directed towards your highest interest rate card. You can rest easily with the knowledge that even while you’ve dramatically reduced the money you throw away to interest payments, you’re financially protected against a temporary loss of income or the typical emergencies you might face. This is just my opinion; maybe you have some thoughts that might be better. Doing anything is better than doing nothing. Do what works for you, if you’ve educated yourself.

Got questions? I (Flexo) and Ramit from I Will Teach You to be Rich are teaming up to answer all of your questions about money. Ask us questions today!

{ 14 comments }

I’ve done a good job of sharing my disdain for Dave Ramsey’s popularization of a method of getting out of debt that caters to unmotivated individuals, the “Debt Snowball” method. That doesn’t mean I don’t agree with his principles or his intentions. I just think he, as one of the most popular “gurus” in personal finance, has to cater to the masses. It makes sense for him to profess a methodology that is simple reaches people on an emotional level. Real financial planners who work one-on-one with individuals to get out of debt and formulate a lifetime financial plan would be able to supply better options.

Dave Ramsey does offer something I like, his “Baby Steps.” These are seven suggestions that, when followed sequentially, will do wonders for helping people struggling with their finances to take ownership of the money in their life and start moving towards a more prosperous future.

Here are Dave’s suggestions, verbatim:

In general, I like this plan of action. These “baby steps” help someone ease into a pattern of new, financially responsible behavior, with small mini-goals which when taken in full view go a long way to help ensure financial stability.

These “baby steps” are designed to appeal to a large mass of people. This is not advice based on any one individual’s real situation, so it’s fair to apply some customization and perhaps even improvements. Here are a few small criticisms.

Is $1,000 enough or too much for an emergency fund base? Dave Ramsey suggests shoring up a $1,000 cash cushion before beginning to pay off debt. Although $1,000 is a finite number of dollars, its value has a different meaning to different people or to different families. A family with an income of $250,000 a year and $1,000,000 in debt may not consider $1,000 to be much of anything, while a family earning $20,000 per year and $100,000 in debt might find the saving of $1,000 to be a struggle. So what’s a better option? I would suggest that this base savings, what is needed to lay the groundwork before embarking on the great debt reduction journey, should be one months’ expenses, whatever they happen to be. That sets a high enough starting goal.

The “Debt Snowball” method is not so great. Despite its popularity and proven track record with a million dollar business marketing this method, I’d like to see more people give a real try to the Debt Avalanche. They’ll save money and time in the long run if they are intrinsically motivated. I’ve discussed this at length before.

Is it too soon to worry about college funding for children? I’ve heard experts suggest that parents should make sure their retirement is fully funded before worrying about funding education for their children. I don’t think saving 15% of household income, unless begun at a young age, will get most parents to a secure retirement, but that depends on the family’s needs at that later date. There are too many variables to predict that with any accuracy. The reason most experts suggest this is because you can borrow money for college, but you can’t borrow money (as easily or inexpensively) for retirement.

I strongly believe that parents have a responsibility to ensure that the best educational opportunities are available to their children, but with the prices of tuition increasingly well beyond the rate of inflation, I’m not sure how well that philosophy will work in the future.

Why pay off the mortgage early? Dave Ramsey is strongly against holding all forms of debt. Mostly, I agree. If the mortgage rate is low enough, and you have the fortitude, risk tolerance, and availability to invest the funds you would otherwise use to accelerate your mortgage payment in an asset allocation designed with a long-term time horizon, it may make more sense to pay just your minimum to the mortgage. But I won’t stop anyone who wants to pay off their mortgage early, even if they might end up with a lower net worth than if they had invested. The market is unreliable, but when paying off a mortgage early, you’re guaranteed to “earn” the rate of interest you’re being charged. It’s not a precise way of figuring the math, but knowing that you don’t have to pay interest that was originally included in your amortization is good.

Thanks go to Dave Ramsey for popularizing good general advice.

{ 19 comments }

Having an emergency fund, money set in an easily accessible location like a savings account earmarked for certain situations, is one of the first steps to being financially secure. This is common advice, particularly among financial advisers. Ideally, one wouldn’t tap the emergency fund at all. That sacrifices some earning power because even high-yield savings accounts lose ground to inflation. In return for that sacrifice comes some stability. With an emergency fund in savings rather than the stock market, you don’t have to worry about a potential loss if you need the money in a down market.

If you can plan in advance and protect yourself, you can help reduce the sting of an emergency.

There is, however, a difference in opinion about which circumstances qualify as emergencies. The biggest emergencies would arise with any event that eliminates an income source for an extended period of time.

Legitimate emergencies

Sudden job loss. For many people, the primary source of income, and thus the ability to pay for expenses, is a job. Most people in the United States trade their time and effort for a paycheck, relying on a company, small or large, to accept that time and effort and provide remuneration. When job loss is sudden, the primary source of income could disappear just as quickly. Very few of us are “entitled” to a severance bonus, providing a cushion to ease the fall for a period of time, so we must plan accordingly.

It’s dangerous to place your ability to earn income in a sole decision maker focused on a company’s bottom line. As an individual, we each must take our income into our own hands as much as possible, and that includes always being prepared for job loss. Part of that preparation involves having an emergency fund available, keeping a current resume, networking with colleagues, seeking recommendations, and studying the industry.

Even with preparation, the loss of a job can be damaging to your finances, and the effect can last long after you find your next job.

Death or medical emergency of a family member. While life insurance can help deal financially with death, it doesn’t cover everything. There is an entire industry designed around planning for death, but an emergency fund will always be necessary. As relatives age or gradually experience a decline in health, you have time to develop expectations and prepare financially, but unfortunately, death is not always this graceful. Emergency funds can be used to help pay for these hopefully infrequent events, from flights to visit distant family members to final arrangements.

Hurricane KatrinaActs of nature. In New Orleans prior to Hurricane Katrina, residents wary about hurricane damage to their homes were encouraged to buy insurance policies covering wind and rain damage. Many insurance policies provided no relief following Katrina because the damage done to homes was determined to be due to flooding. According to USA Today, only one-third of homes carried federal insurance which included protection from flood damage. Many residence thought they were covered in the event of a hurricane, but the insurance companies disagreed.

A typical emergency fund with three to six months’ worth of expenses may not have solved all problems in this situation, but it could have helped. Natural disasters are not always as damaging as Hurricane Katrina, and planning for total destruction will in most cases be excessive, but when designing an emergency fund, it’s helpful to factor in what is likely for your location.

car accidentCar accidents. Auto insurance is generally helpful when it comes to covering for damage due to car accidents, whether caused by you or another party. Often, insurance won’t cover everything you need. Your emergency fund may need to at least cover your deductibles, but also fill in any gaps left after payments arrive. The fund can help pay for a new car if needed.

Surprise tax bills. While review and planning should prevent this occurring, occasionally the IRS finds something overlooked. It happens to even the most diligent. The IRS will usually allow a payment plan to extend repayments over time for an additional fee, but an emergency fund can help cover the liability.

Delay in income. I used to work for a non-profit which, before I had started working there, had a nasty reputation of not keeping enough funds in their payroll account to cover the paychecks for the ten or so on staff. I’ve had friends working for start-up internet-based companies who were asked to forgo paychecks for a time period for the good of the company in its initial building stages. With an emergency fund with three to six months’ expenses, you won’t be in danger of failing to cover your bills. Once the paychecks catch up, you will be able to re-establish the emergency fund.

If delays in income extend longer than six months — personally, I would only accept this from an employer for a month at most, if at all — it is time to find a new job, if possible.

Sudden relocation. Usually, if your employer determines that your job should move from New York City to Ogden, Utah, they will compensate you for your relocation. That isn’t always the case, and your option may be to forgo opportunities within your company and business by quitting your job or accepting the relocation and the accompanying expenses. The decision is personal, but it’s better to be prepared to face the consequences.

What does not qualify as an emergency?

I’ve heard of people using emergency funds for expenses that are clearly not emergencies. While everyone’s definition of an emergency is different, if you want to make the best use of your money, I would suggest not tapping money earmarked for emergencies for these expenses. That said, you can save separately for these expenses.

beachVacation. It’s great to get away from your daily responsibilities for a time, but even if your therapist recommends an immediate vacation, you shouldn’t dip into the money set aside to cover emergencies.

A buying “opportunity” in the stock market or real estate. If you’re interested in timing the market or want to buy a house for the fun of it, save separately for the occasion. Most people overestimate their ability to time the market and could find themselves on the losing end of an investment at the moment they need the cash for a true emergency.

Out-of-town visitors. You just heard your friend from college would be in town for a weekend, and she’s suggested getting together for an evening out. If you don’t have extra cash flow at the moment, you might want to suggest a frugal option. Don’t feel you have to impress her by going to the fanciest restaurants and clubs, particularly if you have only your emergency fund available.

Mid-life crises. Recently divorced and quickly aging? It’s time to buy a convertible sports car. That seems to be the accepted path, but it can be a dangerous road to travel, particularly if your ex-wife has half or more of your money. Don’t dip into your emergency fund to buy a new sports car just because you want to feel young again. It may, however, be time to get together with an old college friend for an evening out.

Keeping up with the Joneses. The Joneses buy what they buy because they have no problem with debt. If you’re conscious about spending, you’ll never keep up with the Joneses in the accumulation marathon, nor should you feel the need. They’ve added a sun room and an in-ground swimming pool, but for all you know, they could be paying for it for years. Resist the temptation to match or exceed appearances, whether with debt or by tapping the emergency fund.

What do you think?

I’m sure there are many emergencies and an infinite number of non-emergencies I’ve neglected to mention. I will also bet the total of my emergency fund that some readers will disagree with some of my classifications. (Gambling: not an emergency; Paying your bookie: possibly an emergency.) Please share your thoughts.

Photo credits: au_tiger01, daveynin, and rayced

{ 12 comments }

Earlier today, I asked via Twitter how much everyone has in their emergency fund in relation to their monthly expenses. Here are some of the responses. (I assumed if the message wasn’t sent privately and if the twitter account wasn’t protected that I could re-post the source of the responses.)

  • nodebtplan: 3 months of expenses in our emergency fund
  • takingcharge: currently only enough to get me through a month or less, but working on saving enough for 3-6 months
  • taliaishere: 3 months in the emergency fund, but am working towards 6 months-that would be much more comfortable
  • Gblogger: Depends on what I count — we stopped segregating specific emergency funds a while back. But at least 6-10 mos.
  • dreamscostmoney: 3-5. It used to be 3, but then I decreased my monthly expenses, so it’s probably closer to 4 or 5.
  • BurgBarbL: I have about 1.5 months’ worth of expenses in my emergency fund.
  • Private: In my emergency fund? One. Not great, I know. But with my new salary, I’m on a plan to make that three.
  • SunFinancial: I don’t have a dedicated emergency fund. All are accumulated in one savings account.
  • bargainr: 9 months

Among these responses, the average (while taking the low end of anyone who responded with a range) is about 3.5 months. Not bad! I have about 3 months’ worth of expenses in my account called “Emergency Fund,” but I have about an additional four times that amount across a variety of savings accounts.

If you’re interested in participated in occasional polls, follow me on Twitter. For those who don’t know, Twitter is a “social media” tool that allows you to broadcast and receive quick and short text updates. I promise not to send spam or to bombard you with “new post” updates. Mighty Bargain Hunter has a list of 118 personal finance bloggers who use Twitter, but many only provide automated “new post” notifications, duplicating an RSS feed.

{ 9 comments }