As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Posts tagged as:

identity theft

If you’re a frequent reader of this (or any other personal finance blog) you’re familiar with credit scores and credit reports, and the advice to check them often.

These resources detail your financial history and provide a measure of your supposed financial risk. They’re also useful tools to determine the safety of your identity. However, when was the last time you checked your ID Score?

MyIDScore.com is a new company that offers what they call, “a new way to quickly assess your risk of identity theft.”

Your ID Score is:

A statistical score that’s based on technology currently used by leading communications, financial services, retail companies, healthcare providers, government agencies, and consumers to assess your risk of identity theft. These companies use ID Analytics’ scoring technology to ensure that fraudsters do not apply for goods and services in an innocent consumer’s name.

Basically, your ID Score will give you an overall picture of the security of your identity, just as your credit score gives you an overall picture of the state of your finances. Monitoring every single part of your identity that gets tossed around is a big job, and MyIDScore.com wants to help.

The interesting thing is, even though you’ve probably never heard of ID Analytics, you’ve almost certainly had your data analyzed by them, notes an MSNBC.com article:

ID Analytics is not exactly a household name. That’s because most of us never deal with the company directly. But if you’ve purchased a wireless phone, have a credit card or applied for a retail charge card, there’s a good chance the company analyzed the information on your application.

How does it work?

After providing your personal information, ID Score utilizes information provided by retailers, governmental bodies, financial service providers, healthcare companies, communication providers and other companies to determine how you can protect your identity.

What about privacy?

Obviously, if you’re providing all of your personal information, MyIDScore.com will have access to quite a bit of what goes on in your life. By doing this, it’ll be easier to monitor what goes on in your life, but you won’t be the only one doing it. The site does take privacy very seriously, and you can choose how your information is used.

Is it worth it?

Monitoring your identity is becoming more and more of priority, especially since the ways in which someone can access your personal information are increasing exponentially. IDScore may be the right fit for some people, and it seems to be an extremely useful and powerful tool.

Am I going to use it? Probably not right now (knock on wood). I’m comfortable with the “old school” methods I’m using to protect my identity for the time being. I can see myself considering IDScore.com in the future, however.

It’s good to know that there are tools out there that can help you keep your identity safe. Many people would benefit from a product like this, and I’d recommend it to anyone who is even moderately worried about their identity.

{ 1 comment }



Banking online by visiting a bank’s website directly to perform typical transactions like checking your balance, reviewing and reconciling your recent transactions, paying bills, or transferring money, is generally safer than doing the same in person, whether at an ATM or a teller. Your information is encrypted and you can take care of your business in the privacy of your own home. There are some dangers, however.

Most commonly, the danger lies in your own computer. If your computer is infected by a virus or a Trojan horse, your account information, like identification name, password, PIN, and secret word, could be recorded by this program and secretly transmitted to someone who will use the information to drain your account. Less frequently, the bank’s database containing customer information can be compromised.

I’ve seen many lists with tips for customers who want to ensure that their online banking experience is safe. For example, customers should always look for the padlock icon in the browser when visiting a banking website, always verify the URL in the address bar has https (note the “s”) before entering a password, and never click on links in emails that claim to come from a bank (phishing). Other general security tips include keeping your passwords private and maintaining up-to-date virus and spyware scanners on your computers.

But there are certain things banks can and should do to keep up their end of the bargain. Many banks already follow some or all of these suggestions, but smaller banks may not always have the money to implement these features. If safety is your concern, look for banks that have put effort into these ideas.

1. Require multi-factor authentication. A user name or number and a password or PIN are no longer enough. Most banks still operate their websites by asking the customer for only a user name and a password to log in. This method is highly vulnerable to phishing and Trojan horse programs. Some banks have implemented additions to this process to enhance security.

ING Direct, in addition to a customer number or PIN, requires you to enter the answer to one of several questions, such as, “What was your high school mascot?,” selected when the account was created. In this case, the question is only asked the first time you are log into the bank from any particular computer, though you may be asked to reconfirm every month.

2. Avoid using input fields in web forms. The most common way to allow a customer to enter information, like a user name and password, into a website is to use a “web form.” Web forms can be encrypted, but their existence is a signal to malicious people who want to steal users’ information.

HSBC Direct requires two passwords, though the second is called a “security key.” Rather than typing the security key using the letter and number keys on the keyboard, the bank’s website presents the customer with a graphic. He or she must use the mouse or other pointing device to click the letters and numbers within the graphic in order to gain access.

3. Require strong passwords. I am lazy. I have hundreds of passwords I must remember for various websites and applications. There is a tendency for people to deal with password overload by using the same password for multiple systems or choose words that are easily memorable. Banks can’t do anything about customers who use the same password across several institutions, but they can enforce “rules” for determining passwords. Strongest passwords should be a mix of letters, numbers, and punctuation. No combination of letters found in the dictionary should be allowed. For example, meaty613 is weak password while yk1lt3m^ is much stronger.

A minimum of eight letters, numbers, or punctuation marks would help to strengthen passwords as well. Long passwords with a combination of characters not found in the dictionary will help to reduce the chances of someone — a friend who knows what you might choose or a computer program that has the ability to use “brute force” techniques to keep trying different passwords until it finds one that works — guessing the right combination. Banks can enforce these rules.

4. Use a dynamic key. To access my work’s network from home or any other remote location, I have a SecurID token. Every sixty seconds, a new six-digit number appears on the token. This number, in combination with a PIN, is required in order for me to log into work from home. Obviously, sending SecurID tokens to every bank customer would be a large expense for any reasonably-sized bank. There are other ways to use dynamic keys, or passwords that change over time.

I am unaware of any bank that currently offers this, but one way to implement a dynamic key would work like this: You enter your user name, strong password, and second authentication key through the bank’s website. The bank retrieves your user account information, including your cell phone number or mobile email account and sends you a text or e-mail message with a dynamic key. You are then required to enter this key into the website.

5. Require password changes every thirty days. In a world where we have hundreds of passwords to memorize, being required to change passwords every thirty days is a huge annoyance. It also invites laziness. I know many people who simply change the number at the end of their password each month, cycling through passwords like flexo1, flexo2, flexo3, and flexo4 each month. Many banks will choose not to implement this rule simply because it is seen as not user friendly. And yes, I would be annoyed if every bank required me to change my password every month. It’s a trade-off between security and convenience.

6. Lock accounts after detecting three incorrect passwords. If a bank detects a series of incorrect passwords for any one account, it should disable the account from being accessed through the web. Most people do not guess their passwords. By requiring a telephone call, during which the customer service representative asks more authentication questions, banks can ensure the rightful account owners can quickly regain access to their accounts while protecting accounts experiencing someone trying to “hack” their way in. Note that the bank should not send an email with a link to unlock the account because the email account may have been compromised, as well.

7. Contact the customer after every transaction. Banks could increase security by informing their customers of each transaction that takes place in the account. When I initiate a transfer at ING Direct, the bank sends me an email to let me know that it has been initiated. If someone else had accessed my account and transferred money out, I would know within minutes and could contact the bank immediately.

ING Direct has also begun to contact me when other companies pull an ACH debit. My electric and gas bill is configured to be paid in full every month from my ING Direct account, and each month, I receive a notice from ING Direct when the ACH is accepted. Rather than email, a quick text message might be considered unobtrusive enough for activity confirmations.

8. Require up-to-date antivirus and spyware detection software. In order to log into my network at work from a remote location, I am required to be running the latest version of an antivirus application. The brand doesn’t matter; I could be running McAfee or AVG Free. AVG Free is one of my favorite security suites. It provides state-of-the-art protection from malicious software (malware), and it’s free.

Banks can install a small application through their website that detects the presence of protective software like AVG Free, McAfee, or Norton, and determines whether the software is up-to-date. If no antivirus software is installed and running in the background, then the customer is presented with options for installing protection. Preventing unprotected computers from accessing the website will help reduce the frequency of stolen account information through phishing.

Some of the above suggestions may be considered annoying or excessive for customers. Banking over the internet is generally safe, but malicious individuals increase their knowledge and ability all the time. They adapt faster to security implementations than banks adapt to new methods of breaching. In the worst case, hackers — or people who pay hackers — can steal not only your money but your identity. I understand that cleaning up the mess left behind when your identity is stolen can be one of the most grueling processes one might ever experience. It may be worth some inconvenience to add more layers of protection between the world and your bank accounts.

{ 17 comments }

If someone successfully applies for a loan or a credit card using your identity, there will be a big mess to clear up. I don’t want to downplay the hassle, there. I would be extremely annoyed if that happened to me.

However, what we hear on the news and especially in commercials for services like LifeLock (lots of lawsuits) and FreeCreditReport.com (misleading at best) is inundating us with fear that it’s almost a given that it will happen to us. The truth is, financial identity theft becomes less likely to happen to any one person with each passing year. From Wikipedia:

Identity theft complaints as a percentage of all fraud complaints decreased from 2004-2006. The Federal Trade Commission reported that fraud complaints in general were growing faster than ID theft complaints. The findings were similar in two other FTC studies done in 2003 and 2005. In 2003, 4.6 percent of the US population said they were a victim of ID theft. In 2005, that number had dropped to 3.7 percent of the population.

When listening to people tout statistics, keep in mind also that “identity theft” is a broad category that includes financial identity theft. They’re both awful, and I hope it never happens to you, but you don’t have to feel like forking over $10 a month for identity theft protection is necessary. You certainly don’t want to publish any sensitive information in the newspaper like Jeremy Clarkson did, but you should be fine with shredding anything that has, say, a promotion code, or your name already printed on it.

Here’s an excellent resource from the FTC.

And incidentally, why do the FreeCreditReport.com commercials hinge on the fact that if my credit is compromised, I won’t be able to get a good job? What does my credit report have to do with my résumé?

{ 6 comments }

Jocelyn Kirsch and Edward K. Anderton live in Philadelphia but they’ve been spending their time in Paris, London, Hawaii, and Seattle thanks to their neighbors. The neighbors aren’t quite as happy, however. The two were using their expensive apartment to assist in stealing the identities of the other people living in their building as well as other individuals.

Police started investigating Nov. 19 after one of the couple’s neighbors reported that she thought her identity had been stolen. A day later, the woman heard from a local UPS store about a waiting package, although she had not ordered anything.

Police kept an eye on the store and arrested Anderton and Kirsch on Friday when they walked in to pick up the package, detectives said.

Kirsch and Anderton

A weekend search of the couple’s $3,000-a-month apartment turned up a cache of tech toys: four computers, two printers, a scanner and an industrial machine that makes ID cards. Police also found $17,500 in cash, dozens of credit cards and fake drivers’ licenses, and keys to unlock many of the apartments and mailboxes in their upscale Rittenhouse Square apartment building. Police are not yet sure how they got the keys. The search also turned up a book titled, “The Art of Cheating: A Nasty Little Book for Tricky Little Schemers and Their Hapless Victims,” as well as a newspaper article on “How to Spot Fake IDs.”

How did they think they would get away with this scheme for long? The article mentions private-school upbringing and supportive parents. Something went wrong. Why are otherwise intelligent people capable of doing something so amazingly stupid?

For more information on identity theft, visit the FTC’s Identity Theft Site. It is a comprehensive guide about the issue of identity theft, including tips for prevention and handling the theft after the fact. While I believe the dangers of identity theft are a bit overplayed in the media, it is an important issue and even the most cautious individual can still be susceptible to identity theft.

Image credit: AP Photo/Philadelphia Police Department, HO

{ 8 comments }