Many Exchange-Traded Funds are Not All They’re Cracked Up to Be

I own shares in one exchange-traded fund, iShares Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Sector Index Fund (IYZ). I picked up the shares with free money from a Sharebuilder bonus, and since it was free money, I decided to attempt to choose an investment narrower than my typical investing philosophy would normally allow. Rather than a broad stock market index fund, I selected an industry that I thought would have great prospects for the 21st century.

For a while, ETFs became a favorite investment vehicle in the financial media. In the most basic form, ETFs are like index mutual funds. They benefit from low turnover, little tax liability, and low management fees. You can trade ETFs like stocks with a similar transaction fee. If you have a lump sum to invest for the long-term, the larger the lump sum investment, the smaller the fee is as a percentage of the assets.

According to Money Magazine, Wall Street is taking advantage of the popularity and frugal reputation of ETFs by creating an increasing number of these investments with higher turnover and fees.

Like index mutual funds, ETFs were designed to track traditional market benchmarks with long track records, like the Dow and the S&P 500. But to stand out from their rivals, lately providers have been cobbling together portfolios based on custom-designed indexes they hope will beat the market’s performance…
No question, traditional index ETFs are still dirt cheap, typically charging 0.20% or less. Yet the average expense ratio for ETFs overall is much higher—0.53% of assets vs. 0.35% in 2002. What’s the deal? Newer ETFs with complex strategies tend to incur higher management and transaction fees.

IYZ falls right below the industry average with a total expense ratio of 0.48%. What have I received for this fee so far? I funded the account on August 9, 2005 with $50. As of today, after reinvesting dividends, my account is valued at $46.99.

Would I have been better off with VOX, Vanguard’s equivalent ETF? It appears that the two funds follow each other closely, but Vanguard carries a slight advantage. The lower expense ratio (0.23%) seems to account for Vanguard’s better performance. That slight advantage could account for a significant difference between the two funds’ performance if I hold onto the account for decades.

Despite recent poor performance, I believe the telecommunications industry is a great choice for the next century or so. I don’t mind “timing” the market with a free $50.

The best investment in 10 years: Get in while you can [Money Magazine]

ING Direct Lowered Commissions for ShareBuilder Accounts

Last month, ING Direct acquired ShareBuilder, a discount online brokerage. The two companies seem to make a good pair, so I think it was a good move for the company.

ShareBuilder has now lowered the commission charged for real-time trades to $9.95. Automatic investments, orders which are grouped together with many customers and executed as many as 7 days later, are still $4. Low prices make dabbling in the stock market more appealing to novices. Lower prices are always welcome, but is this a good thing? Personally, I’ll stick with my buy-and-hold strategy and wide diversification among stocks.

A few years ago, ShareBuilder was offering sign-up bonuses, so I used some free money to buy an ETF and two stocks, IYZ, MSFT, and AKAM. I can’t say that any one of these options has shown stellar performance since I placed the orders. This “play money” is only a small fraction of my investments.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


FNBO Direct
Cash Loans

Credit Card Offers

Recent Comments

FNBO Direct

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Recent Topics on C3 Forums

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

Tip'd
Click here to start saving with ING DIRECT!

Contributors

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance