Håkan Djuphammar, VP of Systems Architecture for Ericsson, made a prediction recently that all new mobile phones sold after Summer 2010 would have two-way RFID chips in them that would allow them to act as a tag or a reader.
If what you just read sounds like technobabble, watch this short news excerpt to get up to speed. Even if you’re not interested in technology, you should learn about the possibilities and the dangers of RFID:
Back to the mobile phone: yes, it would be perfectly easy for all mobile phones on the planet to have an RFID tag/scanner in them. The possibilities for making use of RFID, like the numbering scheme itself, are practically endless. People in Asia use their mobile phones to buy drinks from vending machines all the time, and according to Djuphammar:
the chip might also be used by credit card companies to track the location of cardholders to cut down on fraud.
So, the myriad of privacy concerns aside, does this mean I won’t be able to use my credit card if I leave my phone at home?
RFID doesn’t inherently scare me. I already use one in the keyfob for my car when unlocking the door and starting the engine. It raises ethical concerns, and I think we should plan our next moves carefully. We don’t have a great history of moving carefully forward (people still drive without seatbelts all the time), which is one of the reasons I’m hoping you’ll educate yourself and your friends about this starting today.
If you have the means and the time, I highly recommend the book Everyware: the dawning age of ubiquitous computing, which not only details many possibilities for taking advantage of RFID, it also contains a great starting point for a positively ethical “post-PC” future (including some really neat new icons).
I was speaking with a co-worker who used to be a telemarketer, and she told me that if I’m ever again harassed by any strangers on the phone trying to sell me things I don’t need, I should just say, “Mark me down as deceased.” You don’t even have to pretend to be a different person.
Apparently, they have a check box on their form for “Deceased” that will prevent them from calling you ever again. What’s more, this misinformation gets passed downstream to the other telemarketers that they sell their lists of “customers” to, so those people won’t be calling you, either.
For techies, particularly those who like Apple products, the new iPhone 3G is starting to look nice. The current iPhone already has a mess of cool features, but Apple’s adding speed, GPS, support for Exchange, and many other features to attract new consumers, particularly business consumers.
Most importantly, the price for the entry level iPhone will be lower than less sophisticated devices, only $199.
This price is highly subsidized by AT&T, the only carrier that will officially support the iPhone. For every customer purchase, AT&T provides $300 to $400 to Apple to receive the device. This subsidy comes at a great cost to AT&T, but they’re confident that it will take only two years to recover these costs. Why? iPhone users spend more.
The average phone bill of an iPhone user is $95, almost twice the average of all other customers. If you’re an average iPhone user, you are spending $540 more per year, or $1,080 over the life of the two-year contract, for the privilege of buying an iPhone for only $199. I think AT&T is recovering quite nicely.
Would you buy the iPhone at $199? It sounds like an attractive price at first glance. But what if you had to pay your total $1,279 up front? You’d get to keep your $50 monthly plan with this option.
The good news is this lower price might mean more competitive phone prices across all cellular carriers. The bad news is the higher subsidies may be covered by higher monthly rates.
Information on iPhone subsidy from AT&T Starts Subsidy War, Scott Moritz, Fortune, June 10, 2008.
LeanLifeCoach: In the end how much will the IRS really get; 10% maybe 20% of all this money? And how much will we spend collectively in actual dollars and... on Enforcing Tax Laws Works. Go Figure.