<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Credit Card Statements Are Here!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-205833</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=8487#comment-205833</guid>
		<description>The chart is pretty good because people will finally get a clear idea of how much they&#039;ll pay for using credit cards.  For a long time credit card users were in the dark about how much using credit cards actually cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chart is pretty good because people will finally get a clear idea of how much they&#8217;ll pay for using credit cards.  For a long time credit card users were in the dark about how much using credit cards actually cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-204993</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=8487#comment-204993</guid>
		<description>These charts are not completely accurate. My statement said something like 50 cents of interest saved if I doubled the minimum payments, however, it&#039;s a 0% offer that is set to expire in 5 months. The chart was simply assuming a 0% interest rate for the life of the balance (I wish), when in fact, it will reset to 9.99% in August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These charts are not completely accurate. My statement said something like 50 cents of interest saved if I doubled the minimum payments, however, it&#8217;s a 0% offer that is set to expire in 5 months. The chart was simply assuming a 0% interest rate for the life of the balance (I wish), when in fact, it will reset to 9.99% in August.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-204549</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=8487#comment-204549</guid>
		<description>I love the fact that it says &quot;Savings $500&quot;.  I mean you are still paying $1,100+ in interest! that is about 120% of your bill.  I noticed that Chase is actually advertising now and using that &quot;savings&quot; as something that is good vs. actually getting people to pay minimum they ask for double of minimum paymnet and somehow they claim that you will be &quot;saving&quot; money.

I understand that some people carry balances and do not pay in full, but I am just shocked that someone would take that long to pay off and will pay additional 20%+ annual compounded interest on it. wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the fact that it says &#8220;Savings $500&#8243;.  I mean you are still paying $1,100+ in interest! that is about 120% of your bill.  I noticed that Chase is actually advertising now and using that &#8220;savings&#8221; as something that is good vs. actually getting people to pay minimum they ask for double of minimum paymnet and somehow they claim that you will be &#8220;saving&#8221; money.</p>
<p>I understand that some people carry balances and do not pay in full, but I am just shocked that someone would take that long to pay off and will pay additional 20%+ annual compounded interest on it. wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smithee</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-204548</link>
		<dc:creator>Smithee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=8487#comment-204548</guid>
		<description>Interesting. My screenshot above is from a Chase card, too, albeit one that was acquired from another company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. My screenshot above is from a Chase card, too, albeit one that was acquired from another company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-204547</link>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=8487#comment-204547</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve received two statement recently, (2/28 and 3/3) and neither has a table like this.  Wonder what&#039;s going on with Chase?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve received two statement recently, (2/28 and 3/3) and neither has a table like this.  Wonder what&#8217;s going on with Chase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveDH</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-204546</link>
		<dc:creator>steveDH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=8487#comment-204546</guid>
		<description>My credit card statement only showed the effect of paying the minimum balance, (9 months @ $15 on $87.88) it didn&#039;t give any other figures. I also noticed that there were three entries about interest charged: One for Balance Transfers, one for Cash Advances, and one for Purchases. Although I wondered about making three separate $0.00 entries on a ledger type form, I suppose it might prove beneficial to some. Regardless, as people become more attuned to their finances this “information” is a step in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My credit card statement only showed the effect of paying the minimum balance, (9 months @ $15 on $87.88) it didn&#8217;t give any other figures. I also noticed that there were three entries about interest charged: One for Balance Transfers, one for Cash Advances, and one for Purchases. Although I wondered about making three separate $0.00 entries on a ledger type form, I suppose it might prove beneficial to some. Regardless, as people become more attuned to their finances this “information” is a step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/the-new-credit-card-statements-are-here/comment-page-1/#comment-204545</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=8487#comment-204545</guid>
		<description>I got those this month too, but one of mine was messed up. It said &quot;only the minimum payment&quot; and had a ridiculous number of years and interest charges and then it listed another value with a reasonable number of years and interest charges. The thing that makes me say it was messed up is the &quot;increased&quot; payment was still below my actual minimum payment. I expect the reason for this is that the minimum was recently increased to a different percentage of the balance and the chart used the old minimum.

Anyway, it is just something to watch out for (this was from Chase Bank by the way).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got those this month too, but one of mine was messed up. It said &#8220;only the minimum payment&#8221; and had a ridiculous number of years and interest charges and then it listed another value with a reasonable number of years and interest charges. The thing that makes me say it was messed up is the &#8220;increased&#8221; payment was still below my actual minimum payment. I expect the reason for this is that the minimum was recently increased to a different percentage of the balance and the chart used the old minimum.</p>
<p>Anyway, it is just something to watch out for (this was from Chase Bank by the way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 8/20 queries in 0.029 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 568/574 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2r791h660ghva.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-02-12 19:20:50 -->
