<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wachovia Fees Going Up Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/wachovia-fees-going-up-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/wachovia-fees-going-up-again/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:56:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/wachovia-fees-going-up-again/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=262#comment-335</guid>
		<description>scottrade will never be bought out
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scottrade will never be bought out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/wachovia-fees-going-up-again/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=262#comment-334</guid>
		<description>I have been having an &quot;issue&quot; with Schwab over their $45 inactivity fee &amp; $95 termination fee. Next week I shift over to Scottrade. How is Scottrade treating you? Do they allow dividend reimbursement of stocks in your portfolio? (I heard they once did not.)  I am looking forward to Scottrade but rumors keep swirling that they will be the next firm to be bought. Just my luck I&#039;ll leave Schwab &amp; then find out I&#039;ve been bought back by them.
Comments appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been having an &#8220;issue&#8221; with Schwab over their $45 inactivity fee &amp; $95 termination fee. Next week I shift over to Scottrade. How is Scottrade treating you? Do they allow dividend reimbursement of stocks in your portfolio? (I heard they once did not.)  I am looking forward to Scottrade but rumors keep swirling that they will be the next firm to be bought. Just my luck I&#8217;ll leave Schwab &amp; then find out I&#8217;ve been bought back by them.<br />
Comments appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/wachovia-fees-going-up-again/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=262#comment-333</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how a brokerage firm can get away with charging a termination fee.  I would raise all kinds of hell over that.

JLP

&lt;a href=&quot;http://allthingsfinancial.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AllThingsFinancial&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how a brokerage firm can get away with charging a termination fee.  I would raise all kinds of hell over that.</p>
<p>JLP</p>
<p><a href="http://allthingsfinancial.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">AllThingsFinancial</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 401/401 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-05-21 22:50:56 -->
