Kraft Downsizing or Protecting Consumers?

Advertiser Disclosure This article/post contains references to products or services from one or more of our advertisers or partners. We may receive compensation when you click on links to those products or services.
Last updated on September 8, 2016 Views: 547 Comments: 19

In last Sunday’s Consumerism Commentary Podcast, our guest from Consumer Reports, Tod Marks, talked about product downsizing. With commodity prices rising, companies — particularly food product companies — are trying to determine how they can cover their increasing production and distribution costs without losing their competitive edge.

In order to maintain the same price point, companies often shrink the size of their packaging. Sometimes, as pointed out in the podcast, companies use more air to create a lighter product, like whipped yogurt, so that there is less real product in the package. Consumers are mostly aware of these tactics. In fact, according to Consumer Reports, shoppers prefer receiving less for their money than paying more for the same product.

Kraft is a good example. While the company indicated they intend to weather their increased costs without any effect to their customers, they have already decreased the number of cheese slices in their Kraft Singles packaging, a staple in my household as a kid. Shrinking packages can only go so far; the company intends to cut costs on the corporate side. In other words, not only will consumers see shrinking packages, but some of the company’s employees might want to start thinking about polishing up their résumés.


Article comments

lynn says:

My pet peeve is OREOS. The original cookie had an exact amount of filling. Then they reduced it and I stopped buying them. The next step was to create ‘Double Stuffed’. Oh I was so upset over this ploy. I began buying them again because I couldn’t resist the filling. Then , recntly, they began reducing the double stuffed filling and raised the price to close to 4.00. I’ll never buy another Oreo. I stand behind my decision. I’ll even go so far as to call it an ‘executive’ decision.

4hendricks says:

Everything is shrinking – a pound of pasta is 14.5 oz, a can of tuna that used to make 4 sandwiches, barely makes 2 – I can go on and on.

Donna Freedman says:

I just noticed that the “suitcase” size Diet Coke now holds *20* cans vs. the previous 24. Yet somehow the box looks the same. Sneaky!
Wonder how long before 12-packs become 10-packs? I also noticed that when Minute Maid changed the size and shape of its bottles they also suddenly held less — even though they looked BIGGER than before.
I wonder if that’s why the 2-liter bottles are changing shape — so they can subtract a few ounces from their contents?

Luke Landes says:

Funny that you mention that. I usually get the 12-can fridge packs of soda (for my girlfriend, generally — I don’t drink much soda at all) and I noticed sone new packaging last weekend, with 10 cans rather than 12. I used to be able to get a 12 pack for $3 on sale… Not any more.

Cejay says:

I agree with TakeItEZ that I usually just throw my regular brand in my cart and keep going. Between a fulltime job, household stuff I do not have time to look at everything in the grocery store.

eric says:

My Kraft singles! 🙁

faithfueledbennetts says:

I buy an organic cereal that has reduced the size of their box due to being more friendly for the environment and all, but they say there is the same amount of cereal inside-Now I am wondering what the real deal is! Sneaky sneaky.

tigernicole86 says:

I have to agree with skylog on this one. I’ve noticed this with a few other products(hello, shampoo and conditioner) and I really don’t think it’s about protecting the consumer but maintaining profits. I never really thought of certain things when I was a kid and some products completely went away and or company went away. I thought “oh, too bad” and never realized that there was a company and people working there that weren’t anymore.

skylog says:

i do not really have a problem with this being done, as it is on the customer to know what they are purchasing. that said, my only problem is that they state they are going to shoulder the burden themselves, yet, they use the shrink ray, without any notice to customers. again, it is on the customer, but i would rather kraft just say nothing and shrink the packaging.

wylerassociate says:

or another marketing ploy like “low fat” and “trans fat free” on the nutrition labels.

rewards says:

Best marketing ploy is 100 calorie snack packs.

Anonymous says:

I’ve noticed this with ice cream containers. They have been shrinking for years. However, the pendulum is swinging back. Recently, I saw an ice cream container labeled as “new, larger half gallon size”!

Anonymous says:

How small do you think Tuna Fish Cans can get? They seem to decrease by 1/2 ounce every year of so! They are now down to 5 oz! Soon I feel like I’m going to get a can and it will have NO TUNA AT ALL!!!!!

gotr31 says:

I usually notice things like that but I had not noticed the orange juice! Smaller packages or raising the prices is the same thing. I am totally annoyed when they do both at the same time!

Anonymous says:

Just noticed this with orange juice. The store brand is still 64 fl ozs but tropicana and florida natural are under 60.

Anonymous says:

My first instinct is to be annoyed, but judging by America’s expanding waistlines, I actually think this is a good thing. Please, reduce the amount of cheese I eat even if you have to trick me!

TakeitEZ says:

I agree with Ceecee. It would be hard to notice the difference in regard to this particular product (cheese slices) unless you were looking real close to the package. Most people just grab their regular product off the shelf and throw it into the cart without a second look.

Ceecee says:

How clever. Who would think to count the cheese slices.

Anonymous says:

I think cutting packaging cost might be a bad idea. Doesn’t that compromise the safety aspect, especially for something dairy like cheese?